CannTrust Holdings Inc.
CannTrust Holdings Inc. (CNTTQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNTTQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTTQ | $0.00 | +0.00% | 141 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MKGAF | $124.50 | -2.83% | 55.5B | 17.25 | $7.40 | +2.08% |
| MKKGY | $24.69 | -1.52% | 54.2B | 16.63 | $1.50 | +2.03% |
| TKPHF | $27.50 | +0.00% | 43B | 47.41 | $0.58 | +4.84% |
| HLNCF | $4.62 | -0.86% | 41.5B | 21.98 | $0.21 | +1.87% |
| IPSEY | $30.05 | -6.73% | 40.7B | 19.71 | $1.56 | +0.81% |
| SDZNY | $55.91 | -1.52% | 24.1B | -2797.00 | -$0.02 | +1.21% |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| TEVJF | $14.00 | +0.00% | 16.1B | -93.33 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| SGIOY | $8.87 | +1.49% | 15.1B | 13.04 | $0.68 | +1.80% |
Stock Comparison
CNTTQ vs MKGAF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while MKGAF trades at $124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check MKGAF's competition here
CNTTQ vs MKKGY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while MKKGY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check MKKGY's competition here
CNTTQ vs TKPHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TKPHF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 47.41. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check TKPHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HLNCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HLNCF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HLNCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs IPSEY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while IPSEY trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check IPSEY's competition here
CNTTQ vs SDZNY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SDZNY trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is -2797.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SDZNY's competition here
CNTTQ vs ESALY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check ESALY's competition here
CNTTQ vs TEVJF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TEVJF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -93.33. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check TEVJF's competition here
CNTTQ vs SGIOY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SGIOY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SGIOY's competition here
CNTTQ vs SGIOF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SGIOF trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SGIOF's competition here
CNTTQ vs BIOVF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while BIOVF trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and BIOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOVF's competition here
CNTTQ vs IPSEF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check IPSEF's competition here
CNTTQ vs SFOSF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SFOSF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and SFOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFOSF's competition here
CNTTQ vs ESALF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ESALF trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and ESALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESALF's competition here
CNTTQ vs ESAIY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ESAIY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check ESAIY's competition here
CNTTQ vs GZPHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while GZPHF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check GZPHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HKMPF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HKMPF trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HKMPF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HKMPY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HKMPY trades at $51.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HKMPY's competition here
CNTTQ vs SGFEF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SGFEF trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SGFEF's competition here
CNTTQ vs WIBFF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check WIBFF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HLUBF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HLUBF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HLUBF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HLBBF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HLBBF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HLBBF's competition here
CNTTQ vs SMDPY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SMDPY trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and SMDPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMDPY's competition here
CNTTQ vs LVZPF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check LVZPF's competition here
CNTTQ vs ULIHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ULIHF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and ULIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULIHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CHSYF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CHSYF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CHSYF's competition here
CNTTQ vs APNHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check APNHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs INVVY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and INVVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INVVY's competition here
CNTTQ vs IZQVF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and IZQVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IZQVF's competition here
CNTTQ vs DNPUF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while DNPUF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check DNPUF's competition here
CNTTQ vs LBTSF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LBTSF trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 121.45. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check LBTSF's competition here
CNTTQ vs APNHY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while APNHY trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and APNHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APNHY's competition here
CNTTQ vs HMDCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HMDCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HYPMY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HYPMY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HYPMY's competition here
CNTTQ vs THCBF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check THCBF's competition here
CNTTQ vs DMPHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check DMPHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HTSUF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HTSUF trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check HTSUF's competition here
CNTTQ vs LJUIF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and LJUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LJUIF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CASBF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CASBF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -30.48. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and CASBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CASBF's competition here
CNTTQ vs ARSUF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and ARSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARSUF's competition here
CNTTQ vs TSMRF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TSMRF trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check TSMRF's competition here
CNTTQ vs NPNKF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check NPNKF's competition here
CNTTQ vs YIHCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and YIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YIHCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs MITPF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check MITPF's competition here
CNTTQ vs GTBIF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while GTBIF trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check GTBIF's competition here
CNTTQ vs KARBF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and KARBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KARBF's competition here
CNTTQ vs EVOTF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while EVOTF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check EVOTF's competition here
CNTTQ vs SHEZF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SHEZF's competition here
CNTTQ vs NPPNY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while NPPNY trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check NPPNY's competition here
CNTTQ vs CHIZF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CHIZF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and CHIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHIZF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CURLF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CURLF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CURLF's competition here
CNTTQ vs KSPHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while KSPHF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and KSPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSPHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs GNMLF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while GNMLF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and GNMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNMLF's competition here
CNTTQ vs SWGHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and SWGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWGHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs KKPCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while KKPCF trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check KKPCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs TCNNF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TCNNF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check TCNNF's competition here
CNTTQ vs BIOGY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while BIOGY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and BIOGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOGY's competition here
CNTTQ vs NIKA Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 972.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while NIKA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and NIKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIKA's competition here
CNTTQ vs SHPHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SHPHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs LVTTF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check LVTTF's competition here
CNTTQ vs EVRRF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 886.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and EVRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRRF's competition here
CNTTQ vs NRXCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 841.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and NRXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs TWAPF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check TWAPF's competition here
CNTTQ vs SWDCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 773.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while SWDCF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check SWDCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CSWYF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CSWYF's competition here
CNTTQ vs TRXPF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and TRXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRXPF's competition here
CNTTQ vs TRSSF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check TRSSF's competition here
CNTTQ vs ELTP Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 576.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ELTP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -26.93. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check ELTP's competition here
CNTTQ vs PKBFF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 544.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and PKBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKBFF's competition here
CNTTQ vs AIHLF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 543.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while AIHLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and AIHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIHLF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CCHWF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -7.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CCHWF's competition here
CNTTQ vs PEXXF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and PEXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXXF's competition here
CNTTQ vs KHTRF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 453.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while KHTRF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and KHTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KHTRF's competition here
CNTTQ vs GLASF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while GLASF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -67.78. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check GLASF's competition here
CNTTQ vs BOIRF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 416.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while BOIRF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and BOIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOIRF's competition here
CNTTQ vs AGYTF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check AGYTF's competition here
CNTTQ vs HUMDF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 404M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HUMDF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and HUMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUMDF's competition here
CNTTQ vs FFNTF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, FFNTF has a market cap of 331.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while FFNTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FFNTF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and FFNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FFNTF's competition here
CNTTQ vs VRNOF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while VRNOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check VRNOF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CPHRF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 239.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CPHRF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CPHRF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CRLBF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 232.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CRLBF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CRLBF's competition here
CNTTQ vs BHCCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check BHCCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs PLNHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check PLNHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs PHCUF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while PHCUF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and PHCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHCUF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CBWTF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CBWTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check CBWTF's competition here
CNTTQ vs COPHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check COPHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs LOVFF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LOVFF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and LOVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOVFF's competition here
CNTTQ vs STMH Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while STMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check STMH's competition here
CNTTQ vs JUSHF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while JUSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check JUSHF's competition here
CNTTQ vs NWPN Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check NWPN's competition here
CNTTQ vs HLTRF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while HLTRF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and HLTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTRF's competition here
CNTTQ vs LPCUF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check LPCUF's competition here
CNTTQ vs CNVCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and CNVCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNVCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs GRUSF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while GRUSF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check GRUSF's competition here
CNTTQ vs BIOYF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while BIOYF trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and BIOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOYF's competition here
CNTTQ vs AAWH Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while AAWH trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check AAWH's competition here
CNTTQ vs LRDSF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check LRDSF's competition here
CNTTQ vs ABSCF Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while ABSCF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNTTQ.Check ABSCF's competition here
CNTTQ vs EOFBY Comparison August 2025
CNTTQ plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNTTQ stands at 141. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNTTQ is priced at $0.00, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNTTQ currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, CNTTQ's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNTTQ and EOFBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EOFBY's competition here