Constellation Software Inc.
Constellation Software Inc. CNSWF Peers
See (CNSWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNSWF | $3,606.16 | +0.42% | 76.4B | 102.59 | $35.15 | +0.11% |
| SAPGF | $306.00 | +0.66% | 357B | 55.23 | $5.54 | +0.86% |
| NEMKY | $26.00 | +26.83% | 75.1B | 74.29 | $0.35 | +0.48% |
| OBIIF | $127.00 | +336.43% | 55.9B | 124.51 | $1.02 | +0.18% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.1B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTF | $37.13 | +0.34% | 48.8B | 37.13 | $1.00 | +0.67% |
| DASTY | $36.95 | +0.35% | 48.5B | 36.95 | $1.00 | +0.70% |
| WTCHF | $70.63 | +2.62% | 23.4B | 117.72 | $0.60 | +0.15% |
| WIGBY | $64.01 | -9.71% | 21.2B | 106.68 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
| DIDIY | $4.60 | -1.92% | 20B | 115.00 | $0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CNSWF vs SAPGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 357B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SAPGF trades at $306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 55.23. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NEMKY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NEMKY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 74.29. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs OBIIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while OBIIF trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 124.51. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs INVUP Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DASTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while DASTF trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DASTY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while DASTY trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WTCHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while WTCHF trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 117.72. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WIGBY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while WIGBY trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 106.68. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DIDIY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while DIDIY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs XROLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while XROLF trades at $116.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 134.90. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SGGEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SGGEF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SGPYY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SGPYY trades at $66.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs OCLCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while OCLCF trades at $117.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NEMTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NEMTF trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 72.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LQAVF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LQAVF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while LQAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas LQAVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LQAVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to LQAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NCSYF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NCSYF trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ALMFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs THNOF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMNSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMNSF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs HOILF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KGDEY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while KGDEY trades at $149.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -267.78. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMSNY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMSNY trades at $73.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LIFX Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while LIFX trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 474.25. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FNOXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while FNOXF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SMCYY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SICRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KXSCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while KXSCF trades at $143.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 420.98. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SRBEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SRBEF trades at $213.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -75.07. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ASOZY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ASOZY trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMIX Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMIX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMIX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMIX's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMIX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TMIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ZEUCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ZEUCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ASOZF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ISDSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ISDSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ISDSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ISDSF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ISDSF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ISDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs QTGPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while QTGPF trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WEMXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while WEMXF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMVWF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMVWF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs UBMRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMVWY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMVWY trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KHOTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ESKEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FREKF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while FREKF trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMOAY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMOAY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs MAGTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KNNNF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IPEU Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while IPEU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SWONF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs GBGPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while GBGPF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 113.75. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs VOBIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs EGHSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while EGHSF trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LTTHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ESIGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BTRCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 797M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BTRCF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SLVFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BVSFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TTMZF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMOAF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NPACY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NPACY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NXLLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NXLLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PSSWF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while PSSWF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RWWI Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while RWWI trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NSWEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CHNVF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TCYSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 465.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TCYSF trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BLKLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 462M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BLKLF trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -78.29. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BRDLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NPACF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NPACF trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CMDXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 419.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while CMDXF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IQGLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BHPA Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BHPA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs GBUX Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 401.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while GBUX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -84.90. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RPGHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LCHTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while LCHTF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PLDIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while PLDIF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 58.80. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs JAPPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ELMFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BCTCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BCTCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RLLMF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while RLLMF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PXPHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while PXPHF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DOTDF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PTRRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while PTRRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IVUFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CIGMF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ABXXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 290.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while ABXXF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LOQPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while LOQPF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SMTEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SMTEF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs EXMXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs MCAP Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while MCAP trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BAINF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while BAINF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DAHLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LUPGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LUPGF has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while LUPGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas LUPGF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LUPGF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to LUPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FXSRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NEOJF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while NEOJF trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FBSFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while FBSFF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WONDF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IARGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs EXSPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CBSZF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SYZLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while SYZLF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -162.37. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TCIIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,606.16, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.59, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.