Constellation Software Inc.
Constellation Software Inc. CNSWF Peers
See (CNSWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNSWF | $3,567.57 | +2.07% | 75.6B | 102.08 | $34.95 | +0.11% |
| SAPGF | $287.98 | +0.83% | 336B | 51.43 | $5.60 | +0.91% |
| DASTF | $37.45 | +5.20% | 49.2B | 36.72 | $1.02 | +0.76% |
| INVUP | $26.00 | N/A | 48.3B | -1733.33 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTY | $35.80 | +1.06% | 47B | 34.75 | $1.03 | +0.72% |
| WIGBY | $72.00 | N/A | 23.9B | 120.00 | $0.60 | +0.18% |
| WTCHF | $69.02 | -2.03% | 22.9B | 113.14 | $0.61 | +0.15% |
| DIDIY | $4.89 | +2.95% | 22.8B | 61.12 | $0.08 | N/A |
| XROLF | $118.85 | -2.72% | 18.3B | 136.61 | $0.87 | N/A |
| SGGEF | $17.49 | +0.23% | 17B | 37.21 | $0.47 | +1.52% |
Stock Comparison
CNSWF vs SAPGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 336B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SAPGF trades at $287.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DASTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while DASTF trades at $37.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs INVUP Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while INVUP trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1733.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DASTY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while DASTY trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WIGBY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while WIGBY trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WTCHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while WTCHF trades at $69.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 113.14. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DIDIY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while DIDIY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 61.12. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs XROLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while XROLF trades at $118.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 136.61. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SGGEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SGGEF trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SGPYY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SGPYY trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs OBIIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while OBIIF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NEMKY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NEMKY trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 78.49. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NEMTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 70.23. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs OCLCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NCSYF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NCSYF trades at $171.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KGDEY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while KGDEY trades at $178.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -325.38. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ALMFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs HOILF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMSNY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TMSNY trades at $72.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FNOXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMNSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs THNOF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SMCYY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KXSCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while KXSCF trades at $143.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 423.47. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SICRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ASOZY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ASOZF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ASOZF trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LIFX Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while LIFX trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 375.75. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SRBEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMVWF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs UBMRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KHOTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs QTGPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while QTGPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ESKEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMVWY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TMVWY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMOAY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TMOAY trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -64.20. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IPEU Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FREKF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while FREKF trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -21.71. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SWONF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SWONF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -1014.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WEMXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs MAGTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs KNNNF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while KNNNF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs VOBIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ZEUCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LTTHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs GBGPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 955M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ESIGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs EGHSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 912.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while EGHSF trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BTRCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 843.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BTRCF trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BHPA Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SLVFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BVSFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TTMZF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 653.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TMOAF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs XMMRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BCTCF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NPACF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PXPHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NPACY Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RWWI Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 502.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while RWWI trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NSWEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NXLLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 463M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NXLLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BRDLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BLKLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BLKLF trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -77.29. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TCYSF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TCYSF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 194.53. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CMDXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while CMDXF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IQGLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CHNVF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RPGHF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PSSWF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LCHTF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RTME Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CINGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CINGF has a market cap of 357.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while CINGF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas CINGF's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CINGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs PLDIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 337.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while PLDIF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ELMFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs JAPPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs BAINF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while BAINF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs RLLMF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while RLLMF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 206.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DOTDF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while DOTDF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IVUFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CIGMF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs ABXXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while ABXXF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs EXMXF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs LOQPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SMTEF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SMTEF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs MCAP Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while MCAP trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DAHLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FXSRF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs FBSFF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WONDF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs NEOJF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs GBUX Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while GBUX trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs IARGF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs EXSPF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs CBSZF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs TCIIF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs SYZLF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while SYZLF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -157.05. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs DFORF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.
CNSWF vs WECMF Comparison
CNSWF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSWF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSWF is priced at $3,567.57, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSWF currently has a P/E ratio of 102.08, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, CNSWF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSWF is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSWF.