China Sanjiang Fine Chemicals Company Limited
China Sanjiang Fine Chemicals Company Limited (CNSJF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNSJF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNSJF | $0.16 | +0.00% | 187.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SHECY | $19.18 | +2.82% | 69.8B | 22.17 | $0.84 | +1.51% |
| SHECF | $38.37 | +2.85% | 66.2B | 20.90 | $1.69 | +1.91% |
| BASFY | $14.39 | +0.38% | 51.6B | 144.40 | $0.10 | +4.36% |
| BFFAF | $57.60 | +1.35% | 49.3B | 138.00 | $0.40 | +4.61% |
| SLMNP | $870.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 956.04 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| GNENF | $8.61 | +9.40% | 22.8B | -83.70 | -$0.10 | +0.25% |
| TYNPF | $38.90 | +0.59% | 16.3B | 23.22 | $1.62 | +1.00% |
| AHKSY | $23.69 | +5.23% | 15.3B | 16.70 | $1.35 | +2.10% |
| AHKSF | $10.64 | -8.67% | 14.5B | 15.65 | $0.68 | +2.51% |
Stock Comparison
CNSJF vs SHECY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SHECY trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check SHECY's competition here
CNSJF vs SHECF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SHECF trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check SHECF's competition here
CNSJF vs BASFY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BASFY trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 144.40. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check BASFY's competition here
CNSJF vs BFFAF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BFFAF trades at $57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 138.00. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFFAF's competition here
CNSJF vs SLMNP Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SLMNP trades at $870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 956.04. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and SLMNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLMNP's competition here
CNSJF vs GNENF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while GNENF trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -83.70. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check GNENF's competition here
CNSJF vs TYNPF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while TYNPF trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check TYNPF's competition here
CNSJF vs AHKSY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while AHKSY trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check AHKSY's competition here
CNSJF vs AHKSF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while AHKSF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check AHKSF's competition here
CNSJF vs SHWDY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SHWDY trades at $69.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 70.43. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and SHWDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHWDY's competition here
CNSJF vs GNENY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while GNENY trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -82.20. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and GNENY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNENY's competition here
CNSJF vs SHWDF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SHWDF trades at $69.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 65.74. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and SHWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHWDF's competition here
CNSJF vs MTLHF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while MTLHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and MTLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLHF's competition here
CNSJF vs MTLHY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while MTLHY trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and MTLHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLHY's competition here
CNSJF vs PECGF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PECGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and PECGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PECGF's competition here
CNSJF vs SOMMY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SOMMY trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and SOMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMY's competition here
CNSJF vs IMCDY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while IMCDY trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check IMCDY's competition here
CNSJF vs NNCHY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while NNCHY trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check NNCHY's competition here
CNSJF vs TOSCF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while TOSCF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and TOSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOSCF's competition here
CNSJF vs SOMMF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SOMMF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and SOMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMF's competition here
CNSJF vs BCHMF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BCHMF trades at $60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and BCHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHMF's competition here
CNSJF vs INDOY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while INDOY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INDOY's competition here
CNSJF vs PCHUY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while PCHUY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHUY's competition here
CNSJF vs KURRY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while KURRY trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 75.15. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and KURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRY's competition here
CNSJF vs KOYJF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while KOYJF trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and KOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KOYJF's competition here
CNSJF vs SVYSF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SVYSF trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check SVYSF's competition here
CNSJF vs SLVYY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SLVYY trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check SLVYY's competition here
CNSJF vs KURRF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while KURRF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 67.83. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and KURRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRF's competition here
CNSJF vs KPLUY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while KPLUY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and KPLUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPLUY's competition here
CNSJF vs PTGCF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while PTGCF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and PTGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGCF's competition here
CNSJF vs MXCHF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while MXCHF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and MXCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHF's competition here
CNSJF vs RBTEF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while RBTEF trades at $1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and RBTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBTEF's competition here
CNSJF vs DENKF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while DENKF trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is -20.49. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and DENKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DENKF's competition here
CNSJF vs NPKYY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while NPKYY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and NPKYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPKYY's competition here
CNSJF vs NPKYF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and NPKYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPKYF's competition here
CNSJF vs VYTPF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYTPF's competition here
CNSJF vs LNZNF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while LNZNF trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and LNZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNZNF's competition here
CNSJF vs FRRSF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check FRRSF's competition here
CNSJF vs MXCHY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while MXCHY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check MXCHY's competition here
CNSJF vs TOAGF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while TOAGF trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and TOAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAGF's competition here
CNSJF vs BRGAY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGAY's competition here
CNSJF vs SGLFF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while SGLFF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and SGLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLFF's competition here
CNSJF vs CDSAF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and CDSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDSAF's competition here
CNSJF vs NNXPF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while NNXPF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check NNXPF's competition here
CNSJF vs CRDE Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNSJF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
CNSJF vs TYGIF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while TYGIF trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and TYGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYGIF's competition here
CNSJF vs HZRGF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while HZRGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and HZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZRGF's competition here
CNSJF vs BNOW Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNOW's competition here
CNSJF vs BLGO Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BLGO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check BLGO's competition here
CNSJF vs FGPHF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while FGPHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check FGPHF's competition here
CNSJF vs BSWGF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BSWGF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check BSWGF's competition here
CNSJF vs PLYR Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and PLYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLYR's competition here
CNSJF vs CHHYF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while CHHYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check CHHYF's competition here
CNSJF vs FHELF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSJF.Check FHELF's competition here
CNSJF vs EESE Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while EESE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and EESE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EESE's competition here
CNSJF vs AGTT Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while AGTT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and AGTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGTT's competition here
CNSJF vs OPCGF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 420.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPCGF's competition here
CNSJF vs CHCC Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCC's competition here
CNSJF vs AFPW Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and AFPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFPW's competition here
CNSJF vs FLRE Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRE's competition here
CNSJF vs LBTI Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTI's ROE of -30.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and LBTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBTI's competition here
CNSJF vs VULC Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and VULC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULC's competition here
CNSJF vs NUEC Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and NUEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NUEC's competition here
CNSJF vs MKDTY Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and MKDTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKDTY's competition here
CNSJF vs RKTE Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and RKTE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKTE's competition here
CNSJF vs BMRK Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and BMRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMRK's competition here
CNSJF vs FIND Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and FIND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIND's competition here
CNSJF vs ADKCF Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and ADKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADKCF's competition here
CNSJF vs ADKIL Comparison February 2026
CNSJF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSJF stands at 187.6M. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSJF is priced at $0.16, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSJF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSJF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSJF and ADKIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADKIL's competition here