Clean TeQ Water Limited
Clean TeQ Water Limited (CNQQF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNQQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNQQF | $0.16 | +0.00% | 11.6M | -3.20 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| UUGWF | $15.74 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 30.27 | $0.52 | +4.13% |
| SVTRF | $35.47 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 34.44 | $1.03 | +4.51% |
| STRNY | $35.53 | +0.75% | 10.6B | 34.37 | $1.03 | +4.56% |
| UUGRY | $30.27 | +1.80% | 10.2B | 28.68 | $1.04 | +4.57% |
| GGDVY | $42.00 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 10.50 | $4.00 | +5.08% |
| GGDVF | $0.81 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 10.13 | $0.08 | +4.97% |
| BJWTY | $22.00 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.97 | $1.47 | +6.56% |
| BJWTF | $0.31 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 15.55 | $0.02 | +6.65% |
| PEGRF | $6.76 | +6.00% | 3B | -29.07 | -$0.22 | +6.97% |
Stock Comparison
CNQQF vs UUGWF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, UUGWF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while UUGWF trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas UUGWF's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to UUGWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to UUGWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check UUGWF's competition here
CNQQF vs SVTRF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SVTRF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while SVTRF trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SVTRF's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SVTRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to SVTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check SVTRF's competition here
CNQQF vs STRNY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, STRNY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while STRNY trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas STRNY's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to STRNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to STRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check STRNY's competition here
CNQQF vs UUGRY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, UUGRY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while UUGRY trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas UUGRY's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to UUGRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to UUGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check UUGRY's competition here
CNQQF vs GGDVY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, GGDVY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while GGDVY trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas GGDVY's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to GGDVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to GGDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check GGDVY's competition here
CNQQF vs GGDVF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, GGDVF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while GGDVF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas GGDVF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to GGDVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to GGDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check GGDVF's competition here
CNQQF vs BJWTY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BJWTY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while BJWTY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas BJWTY's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to BJWTY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to BJWTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check BJWTY's competition here
CNQQF vs BJWTF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BJWTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while BJWTF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas BJWTF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to BJWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to BJWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check BJWTF's competition here
CNQQF vs PEGRF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PEGRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while PEGRF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PEGRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to PEGRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to PEGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check PEGRF's competition here
CNQQF vs MWTCY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MWTCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while MWTCY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MWTCY's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MWTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to MWTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check MWTCY's competition here
CNQQF vs MWTCF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MWTCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while MWTCF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MWTCF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MWTCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to MWTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check MWTCF's competition here
CNQQF vs PEGRY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PEGRY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while PEGRY trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PEGRY's P/E ratio is -30.55. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to PEGRY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to PEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check PEGRY's competition here
CNQQF vs CWAFF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CWAFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while CWAFF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas CWAFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CWAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to CWAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check CWAFF's competition here
CNQQF vs TTAPF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TTAPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while TTAPF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TTAPF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to TTAPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to TTAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check TTAPF's competition here
CNQQF vs TTAPY Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TTAPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while TTAPY trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TTAPY's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to TTAPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to TTAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check TTAPY's competition here
CNQQF vs MSEXP Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MSEXP has a market cap of 936.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while MSEXP trades at $555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MSEXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MSEXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to MSEXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check MSEXP's competition here
CNQQF vs TTWPF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TTWPF has a market cap of 917.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while TTWPF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TTWPF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to TTWPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to TTWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check TTWPF's competition here
CNQQF vs AHWSF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AHWSF has a market cap of 862.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while AHWSF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas AHWSF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to AHWSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to AHWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check AHWSF's competition here
CNQQF vs SGXXF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SGXXF has a market cap of 579M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while SGXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas SGXXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SGXXF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to SGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check SGXXF's competition here
CNQQF vs BOTRF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BOTRF has a market cap of 543.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while BOTRF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas BOTRF's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to BOTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to BOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check BOTRF's competition here
CNQQF vs ARTNB Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ARTNB has a market cap of 336.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while ARTNB trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ARTNB's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to ARTNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to ARTNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check ARTNB's competition here
CNQQF vs HEOFF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, HEOFF has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while HEOFF trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas HEOFF's P/E ratio is -312.01. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to HEOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to HEOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check HEOFF's competition here
CNQQF vs AWAEF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AWAEF has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while AWAEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas AWAEF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to AWAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to AWAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check AWAEF's competition here
CNQQF vs DOMWF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DOMWF has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while DOMWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas DOMWF's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to DOMWF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to DOMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check DOMWF's competition here
CNQQF vs CETI Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CETI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while CETI trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas CETI's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CETI's ROE of -9.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to CETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check CETI's competition here
CNQQF vs MPIR Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MPIR has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while MPIR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas MPIR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MPIR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to MPIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check MPIR's competition here
CNQQF vs PUFLF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PUFLF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while PUFLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas PUFLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to PUFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to PUFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check PUFLF's competition here
CNQQF vs AEPT Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AEPT has a market cap of 83.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while AEPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas AEPT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to AEPT's ROE of +3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to AEPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check AEPT's competition here
CNQQF vs HYFXF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, HYFXF has a market cap of 78.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while HYFXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas HYFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to HYFXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is less volatile compared to HYFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check HYFXF's competition here
CNQQF vs ACGPF Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ACGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while ACGPF trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas ACGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to ACGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to ACGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check ACGPF's competition here
CNQQF vs TORW Comparison August 2025
CNQQF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNQQF stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TORW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNQQF is priced at $0.16, while TORW trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNQQF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.20, whereas TORW's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, CNQQF's ROE is -0.48%, compared to TORW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNQQF is more volatile compared to TORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNQQF.Check TORW's competition here