The Connecticut Light and Power Company
The Connecticut Light and Power Company (CNLTN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNLTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNLTN | $34.00 | +2.10% | 205.2M | 0.46 | $74.69 | +5.88% |
| NGGTF | $18.06 | +0.00% | 91.4B | 22.70 | $0.81 | +3.42% |
| ELEZY | $18.75 | +1.19% | 38.7B | 15.09 | $1.23 | +3.57% |
| ELEZF | $35.45 | +0.00% | 36.9B | 14.47 | $2.45 | +4.03% |
| NSARO | $83.00 | +0.61% | 30.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| NSARP | $71.87 | +0.16% | 29.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.76% |
| AILIO | $69.89 | -1.56% | 28.3B | N/A | N/A | +2.58% |
| AILIP | $66.98 | -0.81% | 25.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.58% |
| CLPHY | $9.86 | +0.61% | 25.3B | 17.24 | $0.58 | +3.69% |
| HRNNF | $41.48 | -0.01% | 25B | 25.37 | $1.64 | +2.27% |
Stock Comparison
CNLTN vs NGGTF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while NGGTF trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check NGGTF's competition here
CNLTN vs ELEZY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ELEZY trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check ELEZY's competition here
CNLTN vs ELEZF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ELEZF trades at $35.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEZF's competition here
CNLTN vs NSARO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while NSARO trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
CNLTN vs NSARP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while NSARP trades at $71.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
CNLTN vs AILIO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while AILIO trades at $69.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
CNLTN vs AILIP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while AILIP trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and AILIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIP's competition here
CNLTN vs CLPHY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CLPHY trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check CLPHY's competition here
CNLTN vs HRNNF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HRNNF trades at $41.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRNNF's competition here
CNLTN vs TERRF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while TERRF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERRF's competition here
CNLTN vs CLPHF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CLPHF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
CNLTN vs TEZNY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while TEZNY trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check TEZNY's competition here
CNLTN vs CKISY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CKISY trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CKISY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISY's competition here
CNLTN vs TNABY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while TNABY trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and TNABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNABY's competition here
CNLTN vs TNABF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while TNABF trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check TNABF's competition here
CNLTN vs CKISF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CKISF trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CKISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISF's competition here
CNLTN vs ELIAF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ELIAF trades at $142.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check ELIAF's competition here
CNLTN vs EMRAF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check EMRAF's competition here
CNLTN vs ENEAY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ENEAY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ENEAY trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ENEAY's P/E ratio is 102.18. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENEAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to ENEAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check ENEAY's competition here
CNLTN vs RDEIY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while RDEIY trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check RDEIY's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPCO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPCO trades at $99.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check UEPCO's competition here
CNLTN vs EQUEY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EQUEY trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQUEY's competition here
CNLTN vs MAEOY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while MAEOY trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and MAEOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAEOY's competition here
CNLTN vs FTRSF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while FTRSF trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and FTRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTRSF's competition here
CNLTN vs FORFF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while FORFF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
CNLTN vs IESFY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while IESFY trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check IESFY's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPCN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPCN trades at $77.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPEO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPEO trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and UEPEO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEO's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPEP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPEP trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEP's competition here
CNLTN vs HPIFF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HPIFF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPCP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPCP trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPEM Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPEM trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and UEPEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEM's competition here
CNLTN vs HKVTY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKVTY's competition here
CNLTN vs UEPEN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while UEPEN trades at $62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check UEPEN's competition here
CNLTN vs HPIFY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HPIFY trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HPIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFY's competition here
CNLTN vs HKCVF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
CNLTN vs CPWIF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CPWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWIF's competition here
CNLTN vs EGIEY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EGIEY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check EGIEY's competition here
CNLTN vs ABZPF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ABZPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPF's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWEM Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWEM trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check HAWEM's competition here
CNLTN vs WELPM Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while WELPM trades at $107.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
CNLTN vs ABOIF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ABOIF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABOIF's competition here
CNLTN vs PGPKY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while PGPKY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPKY's competition here
CNLTN vs WELPP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while WELPP trades at $66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check WELPP's competition here
CNLTN vs AILLM Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while AILLM trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
CNLTN vs AILLN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while AILLN trades at $79.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
CNLTN vs AILIN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while AILIN trades at $73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
CNLTN vs AILLP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while AILLP trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and AILLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLP's competition here
CNLTN vs RGPCF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGPCF's competition here
CNLTN vs FPHHF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
CNLTN vs CUPUF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CUPUF trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUPUF's competition here
CNLTN vs RELFF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
CNLTN vs CNTHP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNTHP trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHP's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLPL Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLPL trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPL's competition here
CNLTN vs CNTHO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNTHO trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
CNLTN vs ABTZY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ABTZY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
CNLTN vs CNTHN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNTHN trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHN's competition here
CNLTN vs ABZPY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and ABZPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABZPY's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLTP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLTP trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNLTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTP's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLHO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLHO trades at $37.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNLHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHO's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLHP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLHP trades at $37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHP's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLPM Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLPM trades at $35.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check CNLPM's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLHN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLHN trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHN's competition here
CNLTN vs CNLTL Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while CNLTL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check CNLTL's competition here
CNLTN vs EDCFF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDCFF's competition here
CNLTN vs NZWFF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
CNLTN vs SUME Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while SUME trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUME's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
CNLTN vs EUSP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EUSP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check EUSP's competition here
CNLTN vs MCPB Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while MCPB trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCPB's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWEN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWEN trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check HAWEN's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWLM Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWLM trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWEL Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWEL trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWEL's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWLL Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWLL trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check HAWLL's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWLI Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWLI trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and HAWLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLI's competition here
CNLTN vs HAWLN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 999.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while HAWLN trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check HAWLN's competition here
CNLTN vs RIGH Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and RIGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIGH's competition here
CNLTN vs USWF Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
CNLTN vs RENU Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and RENU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RENU's competition here
CNLTN vs EPGRQ Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 15. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
CNLTN vs NMPWP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while NMPWP trades at $56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here
CNLTN vs IPWLO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here
CNLTN vs IPWLG Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
CNLTN vs IPWLN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLN's competition here
CNLTN vs IPWLP Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
CNLTN vs ENIAY Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check ENIAY's competition here
CNLTN vs PNMXO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while PNMXO trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNMXO's competition here
CNLTN vs NEWEN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while NEWEN trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWEN's competition here
CNLTN vs BANGN Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here
CNLTN vs EVSO Comparison February 2026
CNLTN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLTN stands at 205.2M. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLTN is priced at $34.00, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLTN currently has a P/E ratio of 0.46, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNLTN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLTN is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLTN.Check EVSO's competition here