The Connecticut Light and Power Company
The Connecticut Light and Power Company (CNLHO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNLHO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNLHO | $36.35 | +0.00% | 219.4M | 0.49 | $74.69 | +6.19% |
| NGGTF | $14.38 | -4.24% | 72.6B | 18.07 | $0.81 | +4.20% |
| ELEZY | $14.97 | +0.23% | 32.2B | 12.69 | $1.20 | +3.17% |
| ELEZF | $30.05 | +0.00% | 31.8B | 12.47 | $2.41 | +4.23% |
| NSARO | $77.00 | +0.00% | 28.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| AILIO | $69.98 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| AILIP | $69.00 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| NSARP | $70.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| CLPHY | $8.50 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 14.43 | $0.59 | +4.45% |
| HRNNF | $35.53 | -0.81% | 21.3B | 24.01 | $1.48 | +3.07% |
Stock Comparison
CNLHO vs NGGTF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while NGGTF trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check NGGTF's competition here
CNLHO vs ELEZY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ELEZY trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ELEZY's competition here
CNLHO vs ELEZF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ELEZF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ELEZF's competition here
CNLHO vs NSARO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while NSARO trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check NSARO's competition here
CNLHO vs AILIO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check AILIO's competition here
CNLHO vs AILIP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while AILIP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check AILIP's competition here
CNLHO vs NSARP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while NSARP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check NSARP's competition here
CNLHO vs CLPHY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CLPHY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CLPHY's competition here
CNLHO vs HRNNF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HRNNF trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HRNNF's competition here
CNLHO vs TNABY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while TNABY trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check TNABY's competition here
CNLHO vs TERRF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while TERRF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check TERRF's competition here
CNLHO vs CLPHF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CLPHF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CLPHF's competition here
CNLHO vs TEZNY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while TEZNY trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check TEZNY's competition here
CNLHO vs TNABF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while TNABF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check TNABF's competition here
CNLHO vs CKISF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CKISF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CKISF's competition here
CNLHO vs CKISY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CKISY trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CKISY's competition here
CNLHO vs EMRAF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EMRAF's competition here
CNLHO vs ELIAF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ELIAF trades at $121.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ELIAF's competition here
CNLHO vs RDEIY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while RDEIY trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check RDEIY's competition here
CNLHO vs MAEOY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check MAEOY's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPCO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPCO trades at $97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPCO's competition here
CNLHO vs FTRSF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while FTRSF trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check FTRSF's competition here
CNLHO vs HPIFF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HPIFF's competition here
CNLHO vs EQUEY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EQUEY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EQUEY's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPCN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPCN's competition here
CNLHO vs HPIFY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HPIFY's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPEO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPEO trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPEO's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPEP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPEP trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPEP's competition here
CNLHO vs FORFF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while FORFF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check FORFF's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPCP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPCP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPCP's competition here
CNLHO vs HKVTY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HKVTY's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPEM Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPEM trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPEM's competition here
CNLHO vs EGIEY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EGIEY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EGIEY's competition here
CNLHO vs ABZPF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ABZPF's competition here
CNLHO vs UEPEN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while UEPEN trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check UEPEN's competition here
CNLHO vs HKCVF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HKCVF's competition here
CNLHO vs CPWIF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CPWIF's competition here
CNLHO vs IESFY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while IESFY trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check IESFY's competition here
CNLHO vs PGPKY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while PGPKY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check PGPKY's competition here
CNLHO vs WELPM Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check WELPM's competition here
CNLHO vs ABOIF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ABOIF's competition here
CNLHO vs WELPP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while WELPP trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check WELPP's competition here
CNLHO vs AILLM Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while AILLM trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check AILLM's competition here
CNLHO vs AILLN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while AILLN trades at $78.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check AILLN's competition here
CNLHO vs AILIN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while AILIN trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check AILIN's competition here
CNLHO vs AILLP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while AILLP trades at $68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check AILLP's competition here
CNLHO vs RGPCF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check RGPCF's competition here
CNLHO vs FPHHF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check FPHHF's competition here
CNLHO vs CUPUF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CUPUF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CUPUF's competition here
CNLHO vs RELFF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check RELFF's competition here
CNLHO vs ABTZY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ABTZY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ABTZY's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLPL Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLPL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLPL's competition here
CNLHO vs CNTHP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNTHP trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNTHP's competition here
CNLHO vs CNTHO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 257.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNTHO trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNTHO's competition here
CNLHO vs ABZPY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ABZPY's competition here
CNLHO vs CNTHN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNTHN trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNTHN's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLHP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLHP trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLHP's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLTP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLTP trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLTP's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLPM Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLPM trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLPM's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLHN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLHN's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLTN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLTN trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLTN's competition here
CNLHO vs CNLTL Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while CNLTL trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check CNLTL's competition here
CNLHO vs EDCFF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EDCFF's competition here
CNLHO vs NZWFF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check NZWFF's competition here
CNLHO vs SUME Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while SUME trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUME's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check SUME's competition here
CNLHO vs MCPB Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check MCPB's competition here
CNLHO vs EUSP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 822.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EUSP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EUSP's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWLM Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWLM trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWLM's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWEM Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 728.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWEM's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWEL Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 728K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWEL trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWEL's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWLL Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 727.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWLL trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWLL's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWLN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWLN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWLN's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWEN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWEN's competition here
CNLHO vs HAWLI Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 694.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while HAWLI trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check HAWLI's competition here
CNLHO vs RIGH Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check RIGH's competition here
CNLHO vs USWF Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check USWF's competition here
CNLHO vs RENU Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check RENU's competition here
CNLHO vs EPGRQ Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EPGRQ's competition here
CNLHO vs IPWLP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check IPWLP's competition here
CNLHO vs IPWLG Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check IPWLG's competition here
CNLHO vs ENIAY Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check ENIAY's competition here
CNLHO vs EVSO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check EVSO's competition here
CNLHO vs PNMXO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while PNMXO trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check PNMXO's competition here
CNLHO vs IPWLN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check IPWLN's competition here
CNLHO vs NMPWP Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check NMPWP's competition here
CNLHO vs NEWEN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while NEWEN trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check NEWEN's competition here
CNLHO vs IPWLO Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check IPWLO's competition here
CNLHO vs BANGN Comparison July 2025
CNLHO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNLHO stands at 219.4M. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNLHO is priced at $36.35, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNLHO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNLHO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNLHO is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNLHO.Check BANGN's competition here