Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNK | $25.33 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 13.28 | $1.93 | +0.62% |
| NFLX | $1,230.56 | +0.00% | 526.5B | 52.74 | $23.49 | N/A |
| DIS | $116.31 | +0.00% | 207.5B | 18.06 | $6.39 | +0.87% |
| LYV | $161.60 | +0.00% | 37.3B | 68.47 | $2.35 | N/A |
| FWONK | $98.67 | +0.01% | 32.9B | 99.43 | $1.00 | N/A |
| FWONA | $88.40 | +0.01% | 32.8B | 88.74 | $1.00 | N/A |
| WBD | $11.78 | +0.00% | 29.3B | 38.23 | $0.31 | N/A |
| FOX | $54.58 | +0.00% | 24.9B | 10.87 | $4.91 | +1.01% |
| FOXA | $59.89 | +0.00% | 24.8B | 11.89 | $4.91 | +0.92% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CNK vs NFLX Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 526.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while NFLX trades at $1,230.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check NFLX's competition here
CNK vs DIS Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 207.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while DIS trades at $116.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check DIS's competition here
CNK vs LYV Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LYV trades at $161.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 68.47. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LYV's ROE of +3.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LYV's competition here
CNK vs FWONK Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while FWONK trades at $98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 99.43. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FWONK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check FWONK's competition here
CNK vs FWONA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while FWONA trades at $88.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 88.74. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FWONA's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check FWONA's competition here
CNK vs WBD Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while WBD trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to WBD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check WBD's competition here
CNK vs FOX Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while FOX trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check FOX's competition here
CNK vs FOXA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while FOXA trades at $59.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check FOXA's competition here
CNK vs VIAC Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VIAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check VIAC's competition here
CNK vs NWS Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while NWS trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check NWS's competition here
CNK vs NWSA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while NWSA trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check NWSA's competition here
CNK vs WMG Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while WMG trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 57.09. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check WMG's competition here
CNK vs TKO Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while TKO trades at $191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 77.38. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check TKO's competition here
CNK vs ROKU Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while ROKU trades at $87.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -214.98. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check ROKU's competition here
CNK vs EDR Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check EDR's competition here
CNK vs LLYVK Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LLYVK trades at $93.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is -29.69. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LLYVK's competition here
CNK vs PARAP Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PARAP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check PARAP's competition here
CNK vs WWE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check WWE's competition here
CNK vs LLYVA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LLYVA trades at $90.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is -28.85. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LLYVA's competition here
CNK vs SIRI Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while SIRI trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check SIRI's competition here
CNK vs PARAA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while PARAA trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is 563.67. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PARAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check PARAA's competition here
CNK vs PARA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while PARA trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is 368.00. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check PARA's competition here
CNK vs NXST Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while NXST trades at $211.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check NXST's competition here
CNK vs MSGS Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while MSGS trades at $192.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is -212.62. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check MSGS's competition here
CNK vs MANU Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while MANU trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -34.24. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check MANU's competition here
CNK vs BATRA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while BATRA trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -140.85. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check BATRA's competition here
CNK vs BATRK Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while BATRK trades at $43.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -133.12. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check BATRK's competition here
CNK vs APE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check APE's competition here
CNK vs LGF-B Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LGF-B's competition here
CNK vs LGF-A Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LGF-A's competition here
CNK vs IQ Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while IQ trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 49.75. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check IQ's competition here
CNK vs LION Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LION trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LION's competition here
CNK vs BOWL Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check BOWL's competition here
CNK vs MSGE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while MSGE trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MSGE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check MSGE's competition here
CNK vs AMC Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while AMC trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check AMC's competition here
CNK vs SPHR Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while SPHR trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SPHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check SPHR's competition here
CNK vs IMAX Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while IMAX trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check IMAX's competition here
CNK vs SBGI Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 988.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while SBGI trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check SBGI's competition here
CNK vs PLAY Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 884.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while PLAY trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check PLAY's competition here
CNK vs HUYA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 762.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while HUYA trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -36.89. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check HUYA's competition here
CNK vs RSVR Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 502.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while RSVR trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 63.92. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check RSVR's competition here
CNK vs MCS Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while MCS trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check MCS's competition here
CNK vs AMCX Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while AMCX trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check AMCX's competition here
CNK vs LIVX Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LIVX's competition here
CNK vs AENT Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while AENT trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check AENT's competition here
CNK vs GAIA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while GAIA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check GAIA's competition here
CNK vs GNUS Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check GNUS's competition here
CNK vs CNVS Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CNVS trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CNVS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CNVS's competition here
CNK vs LVO Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LVO trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check LVO's competition here
CNK vs RSVRW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while RSVRW trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check RSVRW's competition here
CNK vs CIDM Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CIDM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CIDM's competition here
CNK vs AGAE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while AGAE trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check AGAE's competition here
CNK vs RDI Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while RDI trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check RDI's competition here
CNK vs NIPG Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while NIPG trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check NIPG's competition here
CNK vs RDIB Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while RDIB trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -33.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check RDIB's competition here
CNK vs TOON Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while TOON trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check TOON's competition here
CNK vs ANGH Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while ANGH trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check ANGH's competition here
CNK vs ANGHW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while ANGHW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check ANGHW's competition here
CNK vs MMV Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check MMV's competition here
CNK vs BREA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while BREA trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check BREA's competition here
CNK vs DLPN Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while DLPN trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check DLPN's competition here
CNK vs CPOP Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CPOP trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CPOP's competition here
CNK vs AENTW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while AENTW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check AENTW's competition here
CNK vs CSCW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CSCW's competition here
CNK vs HOFV Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while HOFV trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check HOFV's competition here
CNK vs KUKE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while KUKE trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check KUKE's competition here
CNK vs CSSEL Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CSSEL's competition here
CNK vs CSSE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CSSE's competition here
CNK vs CSSEP Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CSSEP's competition here
CNK vs CSSEN Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check CSSEN's competition here
CNK vs BZFDW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while BZFDW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check BZFDW's competition here
CNK vs ADD Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while ADD trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check ADD's competition here
CNK vs BLMZ Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while BLMZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check BLMZ's competition here
CNK vs HOFVW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check HOFVW's competition here
CNK vs VIACP Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VIACP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check VIACP's competition here
CNK vs DISCB Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DISCB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check DISCB's competition here
CNK vs VIACA Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VIACA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check VIACA's competition here
CNK vs EMWP Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check EMWP's competition here
CNK vs AESE Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check AESE's competition here
CNK vs MSGN Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check MSGN's competition here
CNK vs RDBX Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check RDBX's competition here
CNK vs RDBXW Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check RDBXW's competition here
CNK vs HMTV Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check HMTV's competition here
CNK vs LVOPP Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CNK has daily volatility of 2.81 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVOPP's competition here
CNK vs ESGC Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ESGC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check ESGC's competition here
CNK vs DISCK Comparison August 2025
CNK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNK is priced at $25.33, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.28, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, CNK's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DISCK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNK is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNK.Check DISCK's competition here