China International Capital Corporation Limited
China International Capital Corporation Limited CNICF Peers
See (CNICF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNICF | $2.95 | +130.29% | 23.2B | 21.07 | $0.14 | +0.85% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 114.2B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| CIIHY | $33.90 | +0.00% | 57.3B | 16.14 | $2.10 | +2.14% |
| MQBKY | $147.97 | +0.68% | 57B | 20.60 | $7.18 | +2.79% |
| CIIHF | $3.03 | +0.00% | 52.8B | 14.43 | $0.21 | +2.40% |
| MCQEF | $140.46 | -10.40% | 51.2B | 19.53 | $7.19 | +3.18% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | +0.00% | 35.2B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +4.53% |
| NRSCF | $6.32 | +0.00% | 18.7B | 8.43 | $0.75 | +6.15% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +0.89% |
| HUATF | $1.70 | +0.00% | 18B | 6.80 | $0.25 | +10.08% |
Stock Comparison
CNICF vs IBKKF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CIIHY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CIIHY trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CIIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs MQBKY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while MQBKY trades at $147.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CIIHF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CIIHF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CIIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs MCQEF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while MCQEF trades at $140.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs GUOSF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs NRSCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while NRSCF trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and NRSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs HTNGF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs HUATF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while HUATF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CMSQY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CMSQY trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CMSQF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CMSQF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs HAITY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs DSEEY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DSEEY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs DSECF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DSECF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs WSOUF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BRPHF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs IVTJF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs IGGHY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while IGGHY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs IVTJY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs IGGRF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CLPE Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CGXYY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CGXYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs FNNTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while FNNTF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and FNNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs TCAPF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while TCAPF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and TCAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs LTSAP Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while LTSAP trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs MAUSY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while MAUSY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and MAUSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs PLSQF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs LTSA Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs NHMAF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and NHMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs MNXBF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while MNXBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and MNXBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs DEFTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CFNCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CFNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CCORF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CCORF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -37.64. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CBGPY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 831.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CBGPY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CNSRF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CNSRF trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CNSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CBGPF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs LKADF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs PHIGW Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 680.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs PHIG Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 650.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while PHIG trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and PHIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs NAGGF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CSCHF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CSCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs ABGSF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 358.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while ABGSF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and ABGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CESTY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CESTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs APPCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while APPCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and APPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs OSHDF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CYFRF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CYFRF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 129.45. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs NPPTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while NPPTF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 56.75. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs ARCNF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and ARCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CAGPF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs GEVI Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while GEVI trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs OZFRY Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs PNPFF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while PNPFF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs STGC Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs ABIT Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while ABIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CURN Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CURN trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs DGTLF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs XAUMF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while XAUMF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs DMGGF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DMGGF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs UFFRF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs HAFG Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while HAFG trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and HAFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CBTTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BBKCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BBKCF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CMZZF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs FDCT Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while FDCT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs DBKSF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DBKSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and DBKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs ARBKF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while ARBKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CFLSF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CRMZ Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CRMZ trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs EBML Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BULT Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BULT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and BULT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs SMURF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BCNWF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs HYHDF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while HYHDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs MATEF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while MATEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs FWAV Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs DYNA Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and DYNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs AVFCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs IHLDF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while IHLDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs DPXCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and DPXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs TRAA Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BIDCF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BIDCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +24.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs ABSOF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while ABSOF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs FFTTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs ITEX Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while ITEX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CCPUF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CCPUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs BLVDF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs HIPH Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BTCWF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BTCWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs AAMTF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs CSTXF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and CSTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs PHIL Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and PHIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs BZRD Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CNICF vs CRKR Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BKBLF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BKLIF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs GBCHF Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BLQC Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BLQC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.
CNICF vs BEGI Comparison
CNICF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNICF stands at 23.2B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNICF is priced at $2.95, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNICF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.07, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CNICF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNICF is less volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNICF.