Cengage Learning Holdings II, Inc.
Cengage Learning Holdings II, Inc. CNGO Peers
See (CNGO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNGO | $20.75 | +6.41% | 1.3B | -19.00 | -$1.09 | N/A |
| RLXXF | $54.74 | +0.16% | 100.5B | 39.38 | $1.39 | +1.59% |
| IFJPY | $22.18 | +1.86% | 14.4B | 36.96 | $0.60 | +2.74% |
| IFPJF | $10.63 | +18.11% | 13.8B | 35.43 | $0.30 | +2.86% |
| PSORF | $15.73 | +3.49% | 10.7B | 18.29 | $0.86 | +1.97% |
| SBSNY | $32.48 | +9.86% | 7.9B | 31.53 | $1.03 | +25.57% |
| SBBTF | $32.75 | N/A | 7.8B | 31.80 | $1.03 | +25.25% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | -23.57% | 6.1B | 26.57 | $1.03 | +3.65% |
| KDKWF | $27.29 | +20.33% | 4B | 77.97 | $0.35 | +0.74% |
| SHXWF | $1.08 | N/A | 1.8B | 6.00 | $0.18 | +7.74% |
Stock Comparison
CNGO vs RLXXF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RLXXF has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while RLXXF trades at $54.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas RLXXF's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to RLXXF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to RLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs IFJPY Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while IFJPY trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs IFPJF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while IFPJF trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs PSORF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while PSORF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to PSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SBSNY Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SBSNY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SBBTF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SBBTF trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to SBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SBSNF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs KDKWF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while KDKWF trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 77.97. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SHXWF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to SHXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs FRNWF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while FRNWF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SMWPY Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 989.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs RZSMF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while RZSMF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs MDDCF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to MDDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs GPOPF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to GPOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs STRYF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs TOCOF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to TOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs GWOX Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while GWOX trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs PCDAF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs YLWDF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while YLWDF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to YLWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs CMTX Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while CMTX trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs HKGEF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while HKGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs STAOF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to STAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SADL Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SADL trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs GLMFF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while GLMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs XLMDF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while XLMDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to XLMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs DTRL Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while DTRL trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs IDWM Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while IDWM trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs FMPR Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while FMPR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs FPNUF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs LEBGF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while LEBGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs PDOS Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs BKMP Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to BKMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs DIGI Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to DIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs HRDI Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to HRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs HRDIL Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to HRDIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs PEDH Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 447. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while PEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs ACNI Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 439. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs MAHI Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to MAHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs SALN Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.
CNGO vs YLWWF Comparison
CNGO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNGO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YLWWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNGO is priced at $20.75, while YLWWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNGO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.00, whereas YLWWF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, CNGO's ROE is -1.09%, compared to YLWWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNGO is more volatile compared to YLWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNGO.