VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF CNEW.L Peers
See (CNEW.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNEW.L | £15.45 | -1.10% | 3.9M | 19.48 | £0.79 | N/A |
| UC65.L | £59.49 | +0.07% | 5.1T | N/A | N/A | +1.68% |
| UB02.L | £4,376.00 | +0.51% | 3.8T | N/A | N/A | +1.82% |
| IUSA.L | £4,423.25 | +0.49% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| SSAC.L | £7,044.00 | +0.69% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQGB.L | £41,832.50 | +0.77% | 981.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,347.00 | +0.49% | 841B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,789.50 | +1.12% | 784.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.73% |
| XESC.L | £7,889.00 | +1.12% | 784.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,280.00 | +0.63% | 770.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CNEW.L vs UC65.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UC65.L has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UC65.L trades at £59.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UC65.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC65.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UC65.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UB02.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UB02.L has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UB02.L trades at £4,376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UB02.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB02.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UB02.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IUSA.L trades at £4,423.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SSAC.L trades at £7,044.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs EQGB.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EQGB.L has a market cap of 981.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while EQGB.L trades at £41,832.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas EQGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to EQGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 841B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SMEA.L trades at £7,347.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XESX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 784.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XESX.L trades at £4,789.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XESC.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 784.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XESC.L trades at £7,889.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 770.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while MEUD.L trades at £22,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IITU.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 740.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IITU.L trades at £2,561.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 693.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UB0D.L trades at £2,167.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs JT13.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, JT13.L has a market cap of 670.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while JT13.L trades at £593.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas JT13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to JT13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CNAL.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 629.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CNAL.L trades at £11,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs JPSR.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, JPSR.L has a market cap of 562.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while JPSR.L trades at £1,966.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas JPSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to JPSR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 545.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IWRD.L trades at £6,174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 529.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XDAX.L trades at £18,936.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 509.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while PHGP.L trades at £23,326.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 496.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while GLDA.L trades at £9,933.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 482.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XMMS.L trades at £4,741.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 459.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while MXWS.L trades at £9,100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 434.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XMUS.L trades at £13,217.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UC44.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 421.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UC44.L trades at £12,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 416.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XMEU.L trades at £8,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CS51.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 411.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CS51.L trades at £17,252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs EUE.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 367.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while EUE.L trades at £4,673.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 362.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IEEM.L trades at £3,467.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UB32.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 347.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UB32.L trades at £8,868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CACX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 339.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CACX.L trades at £6,643.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 303.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XSX6.L trades at £11,794.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 302.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while GBSS.L trades at £22,967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 301.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SEMA.L trades at £3,272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 277.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SGBX.L trades at £23,972.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 270.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IWFV.L trades at £3,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 249.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while ISPY.L trades at £2,331.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 233.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CEA1.L trades at £14,923.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 222.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 221.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while JRDE.L trades at £3,692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs JERE.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 221.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while JERE.L trades at £3,931.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 220.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while RBTX.L trades at £1,070.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SUES.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 218B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SUES.L trades at £608.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while PHSP.L trades at £2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 198.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IUQF.L trades at £1,104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 195.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while HMEF.L trades at £886.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 193.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IWFM.L trades at £6,534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 182.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XDEV.L trades at £3,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SOYU.L trades at £312.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 170.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CEUR.L trades at £31,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SPGP.L trades at £1,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UIFS.L trades at £1,087.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XXSC.L trades at £5,512.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 150.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while GBSP.L trades at £1,753.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 149.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while PRIR.L trades at £1,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IEFV.L trades at £872.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CU1.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 139.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CU1.L trades at £45,712.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while ISP6.L trades at £6,419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs WATL.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 133.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while WATL.L trades at £5,780.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs GILS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while GILS.L trades at £10,196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IPRP.L trades at £2,652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XZEU.L trades at £2,823.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XCX6.L trades at £1,335.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CUS1.L trades at £37,830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UC79.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UC79.L trades at £1,143.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs INFL.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while INFL.L trades at £9,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 118.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SP5G.L trades at £204.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 63.77. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CG1.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 116.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CG1.L trades at £35,867.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CSPX.L trades at £643.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while 0GWB.IL trades at £472.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CB5.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 114.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CB5.L trades at £3,907.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 110.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XRSG.L trades at £22,970.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IGSG.L trades at £5,912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IJPN.L trades at £1,389.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while JRDM.L trades at £2,358.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while PRIC.L trades at £1,623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SPEX.L trades at £4,423.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs H50E.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while H50E.L trades at £4,864.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XDEM.L trades at £5,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs SPES.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while SPES.L trades at £4,163.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while RIEG.L trades at £1,444.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IWDA.L trades at £115.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IEUX.L trades at £4,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IMV.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IMV.L trades at £5,759.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while DAXX.L trades at £18,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CSCA.L trades at £17,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while MTIX.L trades at £14,252.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,398.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs UB45.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while UB45.L trades at £6,100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XDN0.L trades at £4,313.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IUKD.L trades at £834.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while WQDS.L trades at £553.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs COMM.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while COMM.L trades at £549.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while EQDS.L trades at £545.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XLKQ.L trades at £52,555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CRPX.L trades at £13,046.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while CSP1.L trades at £47,384.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while IGUS.L trades at £13,787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while XDEB.L trades at £3,579.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.
CNEW.L vs INAA.L Comparison
CNEW.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNEW.L stands at 3.9M. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNEW.L is priced at £15.45, while INAA.L trades at £8,249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNEW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNEW.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNEW.L is more volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNEW.L.