Chester Bancorp, Inc.
Chester Bancorp, Inc. CNBA Peers
See (CNBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNBA | $4.50 | N/A | 20.1M | 21.43 | $0.21 | +14.22% |
| UNCRY | $32.32 | -0.89% | 201.4B | 9.42 | $3.43 | +2.33% |
| CAIXY | $2.78 | -0.89% | 176.9B | 8.95 | $0.31 | +5.96% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.3B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.24% |
| CIHKY | $31.95 | +1.33% | 158.4B | 8.17 | $3.91 | +4.27% |
| AAMAF | $0.09 | +939900.00% | 133.2B | -0.85 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 124.9B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +5.44% |
| UNCFF | $65.54 | +0.71% | 102.1B | 9.54 | $6.87 | +3.54% |
| DBSDF | $36.03 | +5.78% | 102B | 11.89 | $3.03 | +4.03% |
| DBSDY | $140.09 | +0.49% | 99.6B | 11.55 | $12.13 | +4.07% |
Stock Comparison
CNBA vs UNCRY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 201.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while UNCRY trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CAIXY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CAIXY trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKAYY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CIHKY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 158.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CIHKY trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs AAMAF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AAMAF has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while AAMAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas AAMAF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAMAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is less volatile compared to AAMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CIHHF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs UNCFF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while UNCFF trades at $65.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs DBSDF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while DBSDF trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs DBSDY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while DBSDY trades at $140.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs IITSF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while IITSF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BNPQY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BNPQY trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BNPQF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BNPQF trades at $85.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs KBCSY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while KBCSY trades at $49.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SBKFF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SBKFF trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PBCRF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PBCRF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs LLOBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while LLOBF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PBCRY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PBCRY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs AKSJF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs MZHOF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while MZHOF trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PSBKF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PSBKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs EBKDY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while EBKDY trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs OVCHF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while OVCHF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CIXPF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CIXPF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs LLDTF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while LLDTF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CHCJY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CHCJY trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs OVCHY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while OVCHY trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CRARY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CRARY trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CHBJF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CHBJF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CRARF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CRARF trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs NRDBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while NRDBY trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs NBNKF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while NBNKF trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs UOVEF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs STNDF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs UOVEY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while UOVEY trades at $55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BHKLY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BHKLY trades at $86.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SCGLY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SCGLY trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs DNBBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while DNBBF trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs DNBBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while DNBBY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs KBCSF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while KBCSF trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BNKHF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BNKHF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SCGLF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SCGLF trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CWESF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKRKY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKRKY trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs JPPTY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while JPPTY trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CRZBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CRZBY trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CRZBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CRZBF trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKRKF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKRKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SVKEF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SVKEF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs JPSTF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs DNKEY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while DNKEY trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CEBCF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CEBCF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs JPPHY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while JPPHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs EBKOF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while EBKOF trades at $80.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SWDBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SWDBF trades at $27.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SWDBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SWDBY trades at $26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs JPHLF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs MLYBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while MLYBY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs DNSKF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while DNSKF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PPERF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PPERF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PPERY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PPERY trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs HSNGF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while HSNGF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs HSNGY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while HSNGY trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs GBOOF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while GBOOF trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs GBOOY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while GBOOY trades at $44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs FCNCB Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while FCNCB trades at $1,656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CMAKY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CMAKY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BLMIF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BLMIF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PSZKF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PSZKF trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BDORY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BDORY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PSZKY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PSZKY trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CKHGY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CKHGY trades at $96.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SBGOF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SBGOF trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BPXXY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKHYY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKHYY trades at $82.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SGBLY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SGBLY trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs RSNHF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while RSNHF trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CGMBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CGMBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs MLYNF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while MLYNF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SUTNY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SUTNY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs MDIBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while MDIBY trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BDOUF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BDOUF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CRDIY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs PBLOF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKHPF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKHPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs AIBGY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while AIBGY trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs ISNPY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while ISNPY trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs AIBRF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while AIBRF trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs GPFOF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while GPFOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CMTDF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CMTDF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs GPFOY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SKCBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SKCBY trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BNCZF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs OTPBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKRIF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKRIF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKRIY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKRIY trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs SUGBY Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs MDIBF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs BKPKF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while BKPKF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.
CNBA vs CIMDF Comparison
CNBA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNBA stands at 20.1M. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNBA is priced at $4.50, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNBA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.43, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, CNBA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNBA is more volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNBA.