Loading...

Lyxor MSCI China A (DR) UCITS ETF

CNAL.LLSE
Financial Services
Asset Management
£12112.00
£44.00(0.36%)

Lyxor MSCI China A (DR) UCITS ETF CNAL.L Peers

See (CNAL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
CNAL.L£12,112.00+0.36%678.9B-11.23-£10.70N/A
IUSA.L£4,692.00+0.97%1.4TN/AN/A+1.03%
SSAC.L£7,416.50+1.21%1.1TN/AN/AN/A
SMEA.L£7,556.00+1.38%965.6BN/AN/AN/A
IITU.L£2,796.00+0.76%910.2BN/AN/AN/A
XESX.L£4,918.75+1.49%854.9BN/AN/A+2.68%
XESC.L£8,102.00+1.47%799BN/AN/AN/A
MEUD.L£22,970.00+1.51%787.7BN/AN/AN/A
UB0D.L£2,314.50+5.43%759.7BN/AN/A+1.51%
IWRD.L£6,495.00+1.25%596.7BN/AN/A+1.04%
Showing 1 to 10 of 100 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

CNAL.L vs IUSA.L Comparison

CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,112.00, while IUSA.L trades at £4,692.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;