Lyxor MSCI China A (DR) UCITS ETF
Lyxor MSCI China A (DR) UCITS ETF CNAL.L Peers
See (CNAL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNAL.L | £12,021.00 | -0.39% | 678.9B | -11.23 | -£10.70 | N/A |
| IUSA.L | £4,646.13 | -0.01% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +1.03% |
| SSAC.L | £7,356.50 | +0.40% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,500.50 | +0.64% | 965.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | £2,760.00 | -0.54% | 910.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,880.00 | +0.69% | 854.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.68% |
| XESC.L | £8,038.50 | +0.68% | 799B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £22,785.00 | +0.70% | 787.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UB0D.L | £2,293.25 | +4.46% | 759.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.51% |
| IWRD.L | £6,439.50 | +0.39% | 596.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
CNAL.L vs IUSA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IUSA.L trades at £4,646.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SSAC.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SSAC.L trades at £7,356.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SMEA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 965.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SMEA.L trades at £7,500.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IITU.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 910.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IITU.L trades at £2,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XESX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 854.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XESX.L trades at £4,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XESC.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 799B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XESC.L trades at £8,038.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs MEUD.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 787.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while MEUD.L trades at £22,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs UB0D.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 759.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while UB0D.L trades at £2,293.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IWRD.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 596.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IWRD.L trades at £6,439.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XDAX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 549.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XDAX.L trades at £19,646.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs MXWS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 514.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while MXWS.L trades at £9,506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs PHGP.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 511.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while PHGP.L trades at £23,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XMMS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 508.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XMMS.L trades at £4,995.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs GLDA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 498.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while GLDA.L trades at £9,977.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CS51.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 456.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CS51.L trades at £17,554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XMUS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 456.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XMUS.L trades at £13,894.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs UC44.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 436.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while UC44.L trades at £13,159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XMEU.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 425.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XMEU.L trades at £8,567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs EUE.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 392.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while EUE.L trades at £4,758.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IEEM.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 382.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IEEM.L trades at £3,656.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs UB32.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 366.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while UB32.L trades at £9,348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SEMA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 355.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SEMA.L trades at £3,454.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CACX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 350.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CACX.L trades at £6,858.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 316.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,462.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XSX6.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 310.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XSX6.L trades at £12,064.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs GBSS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 303.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while GBSS.L trades at £23,064.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IWFV.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 287.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IWFV.L trades at £3,773.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SGBX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 278.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SGBX.L trades at £24,087.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs RBTX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 255.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while RBTX.L trades at £1,144.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs ISPY.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while ISPY.L trades at £2,351.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CEA1.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 246.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CEA1.L trades at £15,796.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 246.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SUES.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 244.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SUES.L trades at £641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs JRDE.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 243.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while JRDE.L trades at £3,698.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs JERE.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 243.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while JERE.L trades at £3,987.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs PHSP.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while PHSP.L trades at £2,663.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs HMEF.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while HMEF.L trades at £934.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IUQF.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 199.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IUQF.L trades at £1,142.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IWFM.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IWFM.L trades at £6,672.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SPGP.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 197.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SPGP.L trades at £1,836.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XDEV.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XDEV.L trades at £3,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs UIFS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 187B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while UIFS.L trades at £1,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SOYU.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SOYU.L trades at £306.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CEUR.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CEUR.L trades at £31,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XXSC.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XXSC.L trades at £5,739.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IEFV.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 158.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IEFV.L trades at £905.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CU1.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CU1.L trades at £48,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs PRIR.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while PRIR.L trades at £1,507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs GBSP.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 151.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while GBSP.L trades at £1,757.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs ISP6.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 143B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while ISP6.L trades at £6,776.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IPRP.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IPRP.L trades at £2,685.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CUS1.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CUS1.L trades at £40,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XCX6.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 139.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XCX6.L trades at £1,432.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs WATL.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while WATL.L trades at £5,922.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XZEU.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XZEU.L trades at £2,862.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs GILS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while GILS.L trades at £10,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CB5.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CB5.L trades at £4,072.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs UC79.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while UC79.L trades at £1,201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IJPN.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IJPN.L trades at £1,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs INFL.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while INFL.L trades at £10,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SP5G.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SP5G.L trades at £214.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 123.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while 0GWB.IL trades at £485.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IGSG.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IGSG.L trades at £6,073.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CSPX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CSPX.L trades at £675.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CG1.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CG1.L trades at £37,207.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XRSG.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 118B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XRSG.L trades at £24,619.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IEUX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IEUX.L trades at £4,095.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs JRDM.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while JRDM.L trades at £2,457.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IWDA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IWDA.L trades at £120.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs PRIC.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while PRIC.L trades at £1,659.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XDEM.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XDEM.L trades at £5,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs H50E.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while H50E.L trades at £4,954.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs EQSG.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while EQSG.L trades at £5,305.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs WQDS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while WQDS.L trades at £566.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs DAXX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while DAXX.L trades at £19,162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CSCA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CSCA.L trades at £17,820.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs COMM.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while COMM.L trades at £549.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XLKQ.L trades at £56,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs TRXS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while TRXS.L trades at £3,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs UB45.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while UB45.L trades at £6,344.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IUKD.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IUKD.L trades at £849.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,498.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs MTIX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while MTIX.L trades at £14,482.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs RIEG.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while RIEG.L trades at £1,468.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IGUS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IGUS.L trades at £14,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IMV.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IMV.L trades at £5,788.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs INAA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while INAA.L trades at £8,656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs EQDS.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while EQDS.L trades at £552.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SPES.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SPES.L trades at £4,370.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SPEX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SPEX.L trades at £4,639.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs IDVY.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while IDVY.L trades at £1,921.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XDN0.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XDN0.L trades at £4,258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CSP1.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CSP1.L trades at £49,797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CRPX.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CRPX.L trades at £13,394.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs HMCH.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while HMCH.L trades at £601.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs XDEB.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, XDEB.L has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while XDEB.L trades at £3,608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas XDEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XDEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to XDEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs CE71.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, CE71.L has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while CE71.L trades at £11,568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas CE71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CE71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is more volatile compared to CE71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.
CNAL.L vs SWDA.L Comparison
CNAL.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAL.L stands at 678.9B. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAL.L is priced at £12,021.00, while SWDA.L trades at £8,865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.23, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAL.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAL.L is less volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAL.L.