Caerus Mineral Resources Plc

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 7.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while FRES.L trades at $1,054.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 75.29. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while POLY.L trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMRS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 162.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while THS.L trades at $55.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 128.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while SLP.L trades at $49.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 125.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while EUA.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 70.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while EEE.L trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 53.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while GMET.L trades at $40.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 49.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while GEM.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 48.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while PDL.L trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 29.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while 0V7B.L trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 24.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while HEX.L trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while 0V6Y.L trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L and 0V6Y.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 16.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while 0A4V.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L and 0A4V.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 11.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while GEMD.L trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 10.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while COBR.L trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 6.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while UFO.L trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 3.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while FME.L trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while ROCK.L trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while URAH.L trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while FMET.L trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while SEFA.L trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L and SEFA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 1.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while BOD.L trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 987672.00. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while KDR.L trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929180.00. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while BRD.L trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMRS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 588982.00. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while NTVO.L trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218172.00. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while PERE.L trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L and PERE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, DNK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while DNK.L trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L and DNK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, GPSS.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while GPSS.L trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, ALS.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while ALS.L trades at $46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L is less volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMRS.L.

CMRS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMRS.L stands at 1.50M. In comparison, 0UH1.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CMRS.L is priced at $1.11, while 0UH1.L trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMRS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -1.11, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CMRS.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMRS.L and 0UH1.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).