Cloverleaf Kennel Club
Cloverleaf Kennel Club (CLVFA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLVFA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLVFA | $3.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NCBDY | $16.67 | +3.35% | 43.5B | 24.82 | $0.67 | +0.80% |
| CUKPF | $27.00 | +21.95% | 38.6B | 14.14 | $1.91 | N/A |
| OLCLF | $22.00 | -7.33% | 36.1B | 43.14 | $0.51 | +0.40% |
| ANPDF | $12.75 | +0.00% | 35.4B | 17.00 | $0.75 | +2.37% |
| OLCLY | $21.31 | +3.63% | 34.8B | 41.64 | $0.51 | +0.36% |
| ANPDY | $284.22 | -0.50% | 31.9B | 15.07 | $18.84 | +2.67% |
| NCBDF | $31.50 | -4.91% | 20.1B | 23.68 | $1.33 | +1.51% |
| SHMDF | $121.60 | -0.12% | 10.7B | 44.06 | $2.76 | +1.71% |
| SMNNY | $11.03 | +0.91% | 9.7B | 39.50 | $0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLVFA vs NCBDY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while NCBDY trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check NCBDY's competition here
CLVFA vs CUKPF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CUKPF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and CUKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUKPF's competition here
CLVFA vs OLCLF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while OLCLF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and OLCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OLCLF's competition here
CLVFA vs ANPDF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while ANPDF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and ANPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANPDF's competition here
CLVFA vs OLCLY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while OLCLY trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check OLCLY's competition here
CLVFA vs ANPDY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while ANPDY trades at $284.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check ANPDY's competition here
CLVFA vs NCBDF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while NCBDF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and NCBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCBDF's competition here
CLVFA vs SHMDF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while SHMDF trades at $121.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and SHMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHMDF's competition here
CLVFA vs SMNNY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while SMNNY trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check SMNNY's competition here
CLVFA vs GMWKF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while GMWKF trades at $220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check GMWKF's competition here
CLVFA vs THUPY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while THUPY trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and THUPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THUPY's competition here
CLVFA vs LNNGF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while LNNGF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check LNNGF's competition here
CLVFA vs LNNGY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while LNNGY trades at $51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and LNNGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNNGY's competition here
CLVFA vs THLPF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check THLPF's competition here
CLVFA vs YAMCF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while YAMCF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check YAMCF's competition here
CLVFA vs NINOY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while NINOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 80.85. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check NINOY's competition here
CLVFA vs NINOF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check NINOF's competition here
CLVFA vs YAMCY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while YAMCY trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check YAMCY's competition here
CLVFA vs RNDOF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while RNDOF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and RNDOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNDOF's competition here
CLVFA vs TCCHF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and TCCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCCHF's competition here
CLVFA vs TOMYY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check TOMYY's competition here
CLVFA vs BSFFF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BSFFF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is -403.57. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check BSFFF's competition here
CLVFA vs SNMSF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while SNMSF trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check SNMSF's competition here
CLVFA vs YONXF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and YONXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YONXF's competition here
CLVFA vs CTVIF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CTVIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check CTVIF's competition here
CLVFA vs DTCGF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check DTCGF's competition here
CLVFA vs CLPIF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CLPIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and CLPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPIF's competition here
CLVFA vs DRMMF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while DRMMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check DRMMF's competition here
CLVFA vs MPZAF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 82.59. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check MPZAF's competition here
CLVFA vs HRVFF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while HRVFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check HRVFF's competition here
CLVFA vs HISJF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and HISJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HISJF's competition here
CLVFA vs TNIEF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 775.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while TNIEF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and TNIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNIEF's competition here
CLVFA vs MPZAY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check MPZAY's competition here
CLVFA vs BTEAF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and BTEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEAF's competition here
CLVFA vs SHOFF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 638.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while SHOFF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and SHOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHOFF's competition here
CLVFA vs UETMF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 558.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check UETMF's competition here
CLVFA vs VVCHF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while VVCHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and VVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VVCHF's competition here
CLVFA vs CLKXF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CLKXF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and CLKXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLKXF's competition here
CLVFA vs OQLGF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and OQLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OQLGF's competition here
CLVFA vs GYYMF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and GYYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYYMF's competition here
CLVFA vs GBBYF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check GBBYF's competition here
CLVFA vs FOCIF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and FOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOCIF's competition here
CLVFA vs PYHOF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check PYHOF's competition here
CLVFA vs RPNMF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check RPNMF's competition here
CLVFA vs KICK Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check KICK's competition here
CLVFA vs PMTYF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while PMTYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and PMTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMTYF's competition here
CLVFA vs BOLL Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and BOLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLL's competition here
CLVFA vs CGROF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check CGROF's competition here
CLVFA vs GFIZF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and GFIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFIZF's competition here
CLVFA vs CNLFF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check CNLFF's competition here
CLVFA vs PRKA Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while PRKA trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and PRKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRKA's competition here
CLVFA vs DSHK Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check DSHK's competition here
CLVFA vs KENS Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while KENS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to KENS's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to KENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check KENS's competition here
CLVFA vs BWMG Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BWMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BWMG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check BWMG's competition here
CLVFA vs PFFEF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and PFFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFFEF's competition here
CLVFA vs VIRA Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to VIRA's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and VIRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIRA's competition here
CLVFA vs GTHKF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check GTHKF's competition here
CLVFA vs TOYRF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while TOYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check TOYRF's competition here
CLVFA vs QRSM Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and QRSM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QRSM's competition here
CLVFA vs BTDG Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check BTDG's competition here
CLVFA vs BFXXQ Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and BFXXQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFXXQ's competition here
CLVFA vs MSET Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and MSET have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSET's competition here
CLVFA vs SPQS Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and SPQS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPQS's competition here
CLVFA vs TRBX Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and TRBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRBX's competition here
CLVFA vs VMHG Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 143.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check VMHG's competition here
CLVFA vs XFTB Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and XFTB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XFTB's competition here
CLVFA vs VTMB Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check VTMB's competition here
CLVFA vs ECMH Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check ECMH's competition here
CLVFA vs DAAT Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and DAAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAAT's competition here
CLVFA vs ALTD Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and ALTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTD's competition here
CLVFA vs OMWS Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check OMWS's competition here
CLVFA vs JMIH Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and JMIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMIH's competition here
CLVFA vs GLFN Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and GLFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLFN's competition here
CLVFA vs LCLP Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and LCLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCLP's competition here
CLVFA vs ROCLF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and ROCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROCLF's competition here
CLVFA vs PRXIQ Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and PRXIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRXIQ's competition here
CLVFA vs BYDC Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and BYDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYDC's competition here
CLVFA vs FTFY Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVFA.Check FTFY's competition here
CLVFA vs TVPC Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and TVPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVPC's competition here
CLVFA vs CLUBQ Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and CLUBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLUBQ's competition here
CLVFA vs WMGPF Comparison August 2025
CLVFA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVFA stands at 0. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLVFA is priced at $3.00, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVFA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVFA's ROE is N/A, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVFA and WMGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WMGPF's competition here