Clarent Corporation
Clarent Corporation CLRN Peers
See (CLRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLRN | $0.00 | N/A | 410 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAPGF | $297.87 | -0.71% | 347.5B | 53.67 | $5.55 | +0.88% |
| CNSWF | $3,516.06 | -0.39% | 74.5B | 100.60 | $34.95 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $20.50 | N/A | 59.2B | 58.57 | $0.35 | +0.59% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.1B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTY | $37.84 | -0.55% | 49.7B | 37.47 | $1.01 | +0.69% |
| DASTF | $37.31 | -4.46% | 49B | 36.94 | $1.01 | +0.67% |
| WIGBY | $70.89 | N/A | 23.5B | 118.15 | $0.60 | +0.18% |
| WTCHF | $68.82 | N/A | 22.8B | 114.71 | $0.60 | +0.15% |
| DIDIY | $4.86 | -0.21% | 21.1B | 121.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLRN vs SAPGF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 347.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SAPGF trades at $297.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 53.67. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs CNSWF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while CNSWF trades at $3,516.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 100.60. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NEMKY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NEMKY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs INVUP Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs DASTY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while DASTY trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs DASTF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while DASTF trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs WIGBY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while WIGBY trades at $70.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 118.15. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs WTCHF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while WTCHF trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 114.71. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs DIDIY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while DIDIY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 121.50. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs XROLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while XROLF trades at $111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 128.45. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SGGEF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SGGEF trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SGPYY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SGPYY trades at $65.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NEMTF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 71.44. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs OBIIF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs OCLCF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NCSYF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NCSYF trades at $161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ALMFF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs THNOF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs KGDEY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while KGDEY trades at $160.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -292.64. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs HOILF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TMSNY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TMSNY trades at $73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs FNOXF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TMNSF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs LIFX Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while LIFX trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 500.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SMCYY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SICRF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs KXSCF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while KXSCF trades at $142.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 419.47. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ASOZF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ASOZY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ASOZY trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SRBEF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TMVWF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs UBMRF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TMVWY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TMVWY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs KHOTF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs QTGPF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while QTGPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ESKEF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs IPEU Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs FREKF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while FREKF trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs WEMXF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs MAGTF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs KNNNF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TMOAY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TMOAY trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -52.70. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SWONF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs VOBIF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ZEUCF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs EGHSF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while EGHSF trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs LTTHF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs GBGPF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 967M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ESIGF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BTRCF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 819.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BTRCF trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SLVFF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BVSFF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TTMZF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TMOAF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BCTCF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NPACF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs PXPHF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NPACY Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs RWWI Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NXLLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NSWEF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BLKLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 477.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BLKLF trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -80.86. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TCYSF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TCYSF trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 206.20. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BRDLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs IQGLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BHPA Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BHPA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs CMDXF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 410.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while CMDXF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs CHNVF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs RPGHF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs PSSWF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs LCHTF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs PLDIF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while PLDIF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs JAPPF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ELMFF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs BAINF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 307.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while BAINF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs RLLMF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 306.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while RLLMF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs DOTDF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs IVUFF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs CIGMF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs ABXXF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while ABXXF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs EXMXF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs LOQPF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 263.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while LOQPF trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs MCAP Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while MCAP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs GBUX Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while GBUX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs DAHLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs FXSRF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs FBSFF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while FBSFF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SMTEF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SMTEF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs WONDF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 162.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs IARGF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs EXSPF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs CBSZF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs TCIIF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs SYZLF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while SYZLF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -159.00. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs DFORF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while DFORF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs WECMF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs NEOJF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs THNCF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, THNCF has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while THNCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THNCF's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to THNCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to THNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.
CLRN vs PSHPF Comparison
CLRN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLRN stands at 410. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLRN is priced at $0.00, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLRN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, CLRN's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLRN is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLRN.