CLP Holdings Limited
CLP Holdings Limited CLPHF Peers
See (CLPHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPHF | $8.41 | -0.83% | 21.2B | 14.25 | $0.59 | +4.81% |
| HPIFY | $15.70 | +4.60% | 227.9B | 8.40 | $1.87 | +6.18% |
| NGGTF | $14.11 | -4.27% | 69.2B | 17.42 | $0.81 | +5.26% |
| ELEZY | $15.69 | +2.21% | 33.2B | 13.53 | $1.16 | +3.18% |
| ELEZF | $29.95 | -5.13% | 31.7B | 12.85 | $2.33 | +3.65% |
| NSARO | $79.00 | +0.01% | 29B | N/A | N/A | +6.05% |
| NSARP | $71.00 | N/A | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| HRNNF | $36.63 | -0.22% | 22B | 24.75 | $1.48 | +2.33% |
| CLPHY | $8.37 | +0.12% | 21.1B | 14.19 | $0.59 | +4.52% |
| TNABY | $14.09 | +17.42% | 20.5B | 17.40 | $0.81 | +3.31% |
Stock Comparison
CLPHF vs HPIFY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs NGGTF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while NGGTF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs ELEZY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ELEZY trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs ELEZF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ELEZF trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs NSARO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while NSARO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs NSARP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while NSARP trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs HRNNF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HRNNF trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs CLPHY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CLPHY trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs TNABY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while TNABY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs TERRF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while TERRF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs TNABF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while TNABF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and TNABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs MAEOY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and MAEOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs AILIO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while AILIO trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs CKISF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CKISF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs CKISY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CKISY trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs EMRAF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EMRAF trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs ELIAF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and ELIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs RDEIY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while RDEIY trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs UEPCO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPCO trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs EQUEY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EQUEY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HPIFF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs FTRSF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs UEPCN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs UEPEP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPEP trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs UEPEO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPEO trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and UEPEO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs UEPCP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPCP trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs FORFF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs TEZNY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while TEZNY trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs UEPEM Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPEM trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HKVTY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs UEPEN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while UEPEN trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs EGIEY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EGIEY trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HKCVF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CPWIF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs IESFY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while IESFY trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and IESFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs ABOIF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs WELPM Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while WELPM trades at $110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs RGPCF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs WELPP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while WELPP trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs AILLM Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while AILLM trades at $78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs AILLN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while AILLN trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HAWLM Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWLM trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs AILIN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while AILIN trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs PGPKY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs AILLP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while AILLP trades at $63.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and AILLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs FPHHF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CUPUF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CUPUF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs RELFF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs ABTZY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ABTZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLPL Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLPL trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNTHP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNTHP trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs ABZPF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNTHO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNTHO trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs ABZPY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HAWEL Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWEL trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNTHN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNTHN trades at $39.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLHO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLHO trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLHP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLHP trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HAWLN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWLN trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs CNLTP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLTP trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLPM Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLTN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLTN trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLHN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLHN trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs HAWEN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HAWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs CNLTL Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while CNLTL trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs EDCFF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs NZWFF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs SUME Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while SUME trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs EUSP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs MCPB Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs HAWEM Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 742.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWEM trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HAWEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs RIGH Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs USWF Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs EPGRQ Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs RENU Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs IPWLP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs IPWLG Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs HAWLL Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWLL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and HAWLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs HAWLI Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while HAWLI trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs BANGN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs NMPWP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while NMPWP trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs ENIAY Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs EVSO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs AILIP Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while AILIP trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and AILIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs IPWLN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs NEWEN Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.
CLPHF vs IPWLO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLPHF vs PNMXO Comparison
CLPHF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLPHF stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPHF is priced at $8.41, while PNMXO trades at $74.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLPHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPHF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPHF is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPHF.