Cyberloq Technologies, Inc.
Cyberloq Technologies, Inc. (CLOQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLOQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOQ | $0.17 | +9.68% | 22.3M | -17.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $16.28 | -5.40% | 51.3B | 47.91 | $0.34 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,612.00 | -4.95% | 50.4B | 46.50 | $34.43 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $76.64 | +0.00% | 46.9B | 16.38 | $4.68 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +3.64% |
| TOITF | $118.00 | -3.08% | 9.9B | 66.43 | $1.78 | N/A |
| TMICF | $58.29 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 36.89 | $1.58 | +4.01% |
| NEXXY | $6.25 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 23.15 | $0.27 | +4.53% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.76% |
| TMICY | $55.77 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 35.26 | $1.58 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
CLOQ vs ADYEY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ADYEY trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ADYEY's competition here
CLOQ vs ADYYF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ADYYF trades at $1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ADYYF's competition here
CLOQ vs BSQKZ Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while BSQKZ trades at $76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check BSQKZ's competition here
CLOQ vs KAKZF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check KAKZF's competition here
CLOQ vs TOITF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TOITF trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 66.43. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TOITF's competition here
CLOQ vs TMICF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TMICF trades at $58.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TMICF's competition here
CLOQ vs NEXXY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while NEXXY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check NEXXY's competition here
CLOQ vs NEXPF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check NEXPF's competition here
CLOQ vs TMICY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TMICY trades at $55.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TMICY's competition here
CLOQ vs DRKTY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DRKTY's competition here
CLOQ vs GMYTF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check GMYTF's competition here
CLOQ vs SWDAF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SWDAF's competition here
CLOQ vs STWRY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check STWRY's competition here
CLOQ vs CIOXY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CIOXY's competition here
CLOQ vs EXNWF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check EXNWF's competition here
CLOQ vs DRKTF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DRKTF's competition here
CLOQ vs OVHFF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while OVHFF trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 135.78. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check OVHFF's competition here
CLOQ vs SPNUF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 267.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SPNUF's competition here
CLOQ vs SANP Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SANP's competition here
CLOQ vs MGPPF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while MGPPF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.67. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check MGPPF's competition here
CLOQ vs PHPYF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PHPYF's competition here
CLOQ vs WWLNF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 991.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while WWLNF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check WWLNF's competition here
CLOQ vs WRDLY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 937.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while WRDLY trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check WRDLY's competition here
CLOQ vs YHEKF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while YHEKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check YHEKF's competition here
CLOQ vs CPLFF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CPLFF's competition here
CLOQ vs PYPTF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 655.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PYPTF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PYPTF's competition here
CLOQ vs PRTHU Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 642.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PRTHU's competition here
CLOQ vs FNCHF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FNCHF's competition here
CLOQ vs FMZNF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 582.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FMZNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FMZNF's competition here
CLOQ vs DYNDF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 525.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DYNDF trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DYNDF's competition here
CLOQ vs TDCSF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TDCSF's competition here
CLOQ vs SPMYY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 359.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SPMYY trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 199.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SPMYY's competition here
CLOQ vs NFONF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check NFONF's competition here
CLOQ vs CORZQ Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CORZQ's competition here
CLOQ vs TYPMF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TYPMF's competition here
CLOQ vs FFPP Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FFPP trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FFPP's competition here
CLOQ vs SEEMF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SEEMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SEEMF's competition here
CLOQ vs OTPMF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check OTPMF's competition here
CLOQ vs ABANF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ABANF's competition here
CLOQ vs SERKF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SERKF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SERKF's competition here
CLOQ vs FSOYF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FSOYF's competition here
CLOQ vs ERDLF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ERDLF's competition here
CLOQ vs GIVXF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check GIVXF's competition here
CLOQ vs CGAAY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CGAAY's competition here
CLOQ vs PYFRF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PYFRF's competition here
CLOQ vs FCLOF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FCLOF's competition here
CLOQ vs HAIVF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while HAIVF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -113.83. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check HAIVF's competition here
CLOQ vs WHEN Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check WHEN's competition here
CLOQ vs BGOPF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while BGOPF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -21.60. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check BGOPF's competition here
CLOQ vs DGGXF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DGGXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DGGXF's competition here
CLOQ vs HISNF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while HISNF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check HISNF's competition here
CLOQ vs VRSSF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while VRSSF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check VRSSF's competition here
CLOQ vs CROTF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CROTF's competition here
CLOQ vs JGHG Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check JGHG's competition here
CLOQ vs QBITF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check QBITF's competition here
CLOQ vs NTTCF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check NTTCF's competition here
CLOQ vs APGT Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check APGT's competition here
CLOQ vs SKKY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SKKY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SKKY's competition here
CLOQ vs CORZR Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CORZR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CORZR's competition here
CLOQ vs SCYRF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SCYRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SCYRF's competition here
CLOQ vs NOWVF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while NOWVF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check NOWVF's competition here
CLOQ vs ISDCF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ISDCF's competition here
CLOQ vs TFLM Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TFLM's competition here
CLOQ vs SDCH Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SDCH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SDCH's competition here
CLOQ vs POTTF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check POTTF's competition here
CLOQ vs CLPMF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CLPMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CLPMF's competition here
CLOQ vs SFIIF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SFIIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SFIIF's competition here
CLOQ vs CYBNY Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check CYBNY's competition here
CLOQ vs PLCKF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PLCKF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PLCKF's competition here
CLOQ vs QFEEF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check QFEEF's competition here
CLOQ vs EPXGF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check EPXGF's competition here
CLOQ vs DLTXF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DLTXF's competition here
CLOQ vs DSAIF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DSAIF's competition here
CLOQ vs FOBIF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FOBIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FOBIF's competition here
CLOQ vs DRKOF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DRKOF's competition here
CLOQ vs IPNFF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check IPNFF's competition here
CLOQ vs TGCB Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TGCB trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TGCB's competition here
CLOQ vs DVPNF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check DVPNF's competition here
CLOQ vs NBVAF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while NBVAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check NBVAF's competition here
CLOQ vs RKNEF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while RKNEF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check RKNEF's competition here
CLOQ vs INAR Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check INAR's competition here
CLOQ vs VENZF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while VENZF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check VENZF's competition here
CLOQ vs PKKFF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PKKFF's competition here
CLOQ vs PKLBF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check PKLBF's competition here
CLOQ vs MODGF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check MODGF's competition here
CLOQ vs OVTZ Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check OVTZ's competition here
CLOQ vs KCRD Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check KCRD's competition here
CLOQ vs VISM Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check VISM's competition here
CLOQ vs RIHT Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check RIHT's competition here
CLOQ vs MBLMF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check MBLMF's competition here
CLOQ vs ATCHW Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ATCHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ATCHW's competition here
CLOQ vs RCWDF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check RCWDF's competition here
CLOQ vs INOTF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check INOTF's competition here
CLOQ vs FUAPF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FUAPF's competition here
CLOQ vs TONR Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 781.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check TONR's competition here
CLOQ vs ITNF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check ITNF's competition here
CLOQ vs FSRDQ Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check FSRDQ's competition here
CLOQ vs SMKG Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is less volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SMKG's competition here
CLOQ vs SLXXF Comparison August 2025
CLOQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOQ stands at 22.3M. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 632.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOQ is priced at $0.17, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOQ currently has a P/E ratio of -17.00, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CLOQ's ROE is +1.22%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of +6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOQ is more volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOQ.Check SLXXF's competition here