Cellnex Telecom, S.A.
Cellnex Telecom, S.A. CLNXF Peers
See (CLNXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLNXF | $38.80 | +1.32% | 27.4B | -485.00 | -$0.08 | +0.18% |
| RNHEF | $0.00 | -0.00% | 93.9B | -2.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| VNNVF | $35.40 | +6.63% | 29.6B | -35.76 | -$0.99 | +3.96% |
| VONOY | $16.79 | +3.26% | 27.8B | -31.42 | -$0.53 | +3.96% |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +4.02% |
| SURDF | $38.69 | -0.01% | 19.4B | 14.61 | $2.82 | +1.15% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 33.00 | $1.00 | +4.52% |
| SWPFF | $2.60 | +4.43% | 14.9B | -129.75 | -$0.02 | +5.44% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +0.01% | 12.3B | 9.32 | $1.40 | N/A |
| IFSUF | $12.43 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 25.56 | $0.45 | +9.83% |
Stock Comparison
CLNXF vs RNHEF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs VNNVF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while VNNVF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -35.76. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs VONOY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while VONOY trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs VTAGY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to VTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SURDF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SURDF trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs VTWRF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SWPFF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SWPFF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -129.75. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SURYY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs IFSUF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while IFSUF trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CLILF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CLILF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs AZRGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs HULCF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while HULCF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SWPRF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs NXDCF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while NXDCF trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -179.43. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs WRFRF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while WRFRF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ESRCF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ESRCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs LEGIF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while LEGIF trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs LGMMY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to LGMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SCOTF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs HLPPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while HLPPF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to HLPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs NMEHF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while NMEHF trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to NMEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs HLPPY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while HLPPY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs FBGGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 136.64. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SSSAF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SSSAF trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CWSRF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CWSRF trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs TYTMF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while TYTMF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs TAGYY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to TAGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs AANNF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while AANNF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs IWGFF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while IWGFF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 151.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CTRGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs VGPBF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while VGPBF trades at $102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CGSHY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to CGSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs TAGOF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while TAGOF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs GRDDY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while GRDDY trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CNPPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs GRGTF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while GRGTF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SRRLF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SRRLF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs HYSNF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs GRNNF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while GRNNF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs WIHLY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to WIHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs DUSCF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to DUSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ASGTF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ASGTF trades at $39.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 494.02. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ASGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SVLPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs EVGPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while EVGPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ENTOF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs FBGBY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to FBGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MEQYF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MEQYF trades at $133.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ACNDF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ACNDF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs VIBVY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to VIBVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ICHIF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ICHIF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SVAUF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SVAUF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -42.69. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs GRMHF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs RLHPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to RLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs HYSNY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 911.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while HYSNY trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 355.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SSHLF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 874.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MMHTF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs PTLKF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SSHLY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SSHLY trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs GBCEY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to GBCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs KWLGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to KWLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs JPPSF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to JPPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SHMSF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs DLMI Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while DLMI trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs AGGHF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, AGGHF has a market cap of 363.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while AGGHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas AGGHF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGGHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to AGGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs LSLPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 331.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while LSLPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SOHOF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SOHOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MDTWF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MDTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MDPCF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MDPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs NTPIF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while NTPIF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs FXTGY Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs SDWHF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to SDWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs FCRIF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to FCRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MRFGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs TPRP Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while TPRP trades at $21,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 454.55. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs BREUF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while BREUF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.98. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MHIVF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MHIVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs PKTEF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while PKTEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -44.01. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs AZLCZ Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while AZLCZ trades at $1,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs OJOC Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CPTP Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CPTP trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs BVERS Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while BVERS trades at $3,050.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to BVERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs CRSS Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs TNHDF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to TNHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ADPPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs PCPDF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MDICF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MDICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs LGYSF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to LGYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ABCP Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ABCP trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ASPZ Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ASPZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is less volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MNGGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MNGGF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs DIVVZ Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to DIVVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs BCKMF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to BCKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ATTGF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs TRPTF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while TRPTF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to TRPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MGAG Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs ADHLF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MHPC Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MHPC has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MHPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MHPC's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MHPC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MHPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs PRPPF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to PRPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.
CLNXF vs MSGNF Comparison
CLNXF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNXF stands at 27.4B. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNXF is priced at $38.80, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNXF currently has a P/E ratio of -485.00, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CLNXF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNXF is more volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNXF.