Clean Vision Corporation

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while FOJCY trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check FOJCY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CZAVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CZAVF trades at $60.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CZAVF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CZAVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to CZAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CZAVF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while OEZVF trades at $78.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check OEZVF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while OEZVY trades at $15.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to OEZVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check OEZVY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TKECY trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TKECY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TKECY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CEZYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CEZYY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while FOJCF trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check FOJCF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CLPXF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CLPXF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while KAEPY trades at $6.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check KAEPY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while KAEPF trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check KAEPF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while DOGEF trades at $32.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to DOGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check DOGEF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while DNNGY trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check DNNGY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while EDRVF trades at $11.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to EDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check EDRVF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, MDDNF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while MDDNF trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MDDNF's P/E ratio is 114.26. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to MDDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to MDDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check MDDNF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TKECF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TKECF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TKECF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CLPXY trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CLPXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CLPXY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while BRENF trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check BRENF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check NOSPF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while COENF trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check COENF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check MGHTF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while IFUUF trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check IFUUF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to AGQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check AGQPF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PUPOF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while NPIFF trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is -106.37. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check NPIFF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CPOIF trades at $12.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 568.64. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CPOIF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TEPCF trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to TEPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TEPCF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while DRXGY trades at $18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to DRXGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check DRXGY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while DRXGF trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to DRXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check DRXGF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TEPCY trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to TEPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TEPCY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while EDRWY trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to EDRWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check EDRWY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while EPWDF trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check EPWDF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TREAY trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TREAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TREAY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TRSWF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CGKEF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while BRLXF trades at $21.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is -304.43. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to BRLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check BRLXF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while INGXF trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to INGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check INGXF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to ALRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ALRCF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CGKEY trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CGKEY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TREAF trades at $13.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TREAF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while FSGCY trades at $8.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to FSGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check FSGCY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while STECF trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check STECF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ENGDF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 984.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SEYMF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 924.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check VLTAF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to ERXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ERXCF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 413.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CWPWF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to CWPWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CWPWF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while LGSXY trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check LGSXY's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while OKEPF trades at $6.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to OKEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check OKEPF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PVLTF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PVLTF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ENLTF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ATRWF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ATRWF trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ATRWF's P/E ratio is -425.00. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ATRWF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to ATRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ATRWF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SMTLD's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while RAMPF trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -18.20. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to RAMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check RAMPF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to SVMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SVMRF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to PHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PHNGF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, IESVF has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while IESVF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IESVF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to IESVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to IESVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check IESVF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TDWRF trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TDWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TDWRF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to SKPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SKPGF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SMTLF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to SMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SMTLF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while GIPIF trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to GIPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check GIPIF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while WEGYF trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check WEGYF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SMAYF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to SMAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SMAYF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while WNDW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check WNDW's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, SHUNF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while SHUNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas SHUNF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to SHUNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to SHUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check SHUNF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CLMOF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CWGYF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CWGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CWGYF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to PHIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PHIXF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to AZLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check AZLOF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while RROYF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to RROYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check RROYF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while AZREF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to AZREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check AZREF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while GEBRF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to GEBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check GEBRF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while AWSL trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check AWSL's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ASRE trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ASRE's ROE of +5.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ASRE's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of -4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check MOTNF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TNSTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to TNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TNSTF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while NKWFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check NKWFF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while VGREF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to VGREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check VGREF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while FNEC trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to FNEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check FNEC's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PRHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to PRHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PRHL's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while VXIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check VXIT's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 803.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ALKHF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while NEVE trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to NEVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check NEVE's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 736.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PWCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PWCO's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, GSFI has a market cap of 654.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while GSFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GSFI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to GSFI's ROE of +7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to GSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check GSFI's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ENCVF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 470.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while MMMW trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to MMMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check MMMW's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, IICN has a market cap of 143.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while IICN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas IICN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to IICN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to IICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check IICN's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while VSPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check VSPC's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 94.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while GEECF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check GEECF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 66.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to ETRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ETRXF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 54.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while PSPW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to PSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check PSPW's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while TPII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to TPII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check TPII's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ARSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to ARSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ARSC's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CPWR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CPWR's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while QSPW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to QSPW's ROE of -96.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is less volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check QSPW's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to ZHYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check ZHYLF's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while VENG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to VENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check VENG's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while VCII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to VCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check VCII's competition here

CLNV plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLNV stands at 15M. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNV is priced at $0.02, while CGEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLNV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.75, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNV's ROE is +1.09%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNV is more volatile compared to CGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNV.Check CGEI's competition here