ClickStream Corporation
ClickStream Corporation CLIS Peers
See (CLIS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIS | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 34.3K | -0.00 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| NTDOF | $85.35 | +5.23% | 99.4B | 52.04 | $1.64 | +1.23% |
| NTDOY | $20.96 | +2.54% | 97.6B | 49.90 | $0.42 | +0.28% |
| NETTF | $25.18 | +6.24% | 80.1B | 17.99 | $1.40 | +2.59% |
| KONMY | $68.00 | +4.68% | 18.4B | 35.42 | $1.92 | +0.19% |
| NEXOY | $18.24 | -0.16% | 14.8B | 17.37 | $1.05 | +0.00% |
| NEXOF | $15.70 | N/A | 12.7B | 14.95 | $1.05 | +0.01% |
| CCOEY | $15.13 | +2.09% | 12.7B | 37.83 | $0.40 | +0.38% |
| CCOEF | $25.35 | N/A | 10.6B | 31.69 | $0.80 | +1.07% |
| SQNXF | $63.00 | +8.19% | 7.6B | 45.32 | $1.39 | +1.07% |
Stock Comparison
CLIS vs NTDOF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NTDOF trades at $85.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs NTDOY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NTDOY trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 49.90. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs NETTF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NETTF trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs KONMY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KONMY trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs NEXOY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NEXOY trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs NEXOF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NEXOF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs CCOEY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while CCOEY trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs CCOEF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while CCOEF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SQNXF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SQNXF trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 45.32. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs BLBLF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BLBLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -90.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SQNNY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SQNNY trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs OTGLY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while OTGLY trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 59.19. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs KSFTF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs OTGLF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while OTGLF trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SGAMY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SGAMY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs BCDMF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SGAMF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SGAMF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs KYYWF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs THQQF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while THQQF trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs PRXXF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PRXXF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs DNACF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while DNACF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs UBSFF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while UBSFF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs UBSFY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while UBSFY trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs MIXIF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while MIXIF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs KYYWY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs XDNCF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while XDNCF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 299.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GUNGF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 917.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GUNGF trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GREZF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 860.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GREZF trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs RVTTY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs IGGGF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 554.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs TSVNF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs BOYAF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BOYAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs STLFF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 400.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while STLFF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SCFR Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SCFR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs BLITF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BLITF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs RMDEF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while RMDEF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -222.22. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs AKAFF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while AKAFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs AXNVF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 255.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while AXNVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GENTF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GENTF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs FRRDF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs ENADF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ENADF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs FGRTF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs PONGF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PONGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs IDGAF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs POPRF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs EAGRF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while EAGRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GAMGF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of +15.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs VSQTF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while VSQTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs ZUKI Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ZUKI trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SMPBF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SRVTF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SCTGF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs WIGAF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs ENDRF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs NVNT Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs YDRMF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GGAMF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs PRYNF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs FRZT Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs TAPM Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 955.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TAPM trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs EPYFF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 947.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GMETF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 944.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SWMIF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs KSMRF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 683.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs IMGX Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs APETF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 635.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while APETF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs WGRFF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 447.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs ATIG Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 296.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs FASDF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 210K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs IENT Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 150.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IENT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs TIIDF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs COUV Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GMGT Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 45.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs PLGC Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs NTEK Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS and NTEK have similar daily volatility (196.04).
CLIS vs STIE Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs LIVC Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs BLKCF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 12.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS and BLKCF have similar daily volatility (196.04).
CLIS vs WINRW Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs ADTR Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs VRVR Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs YVRLF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs WINR Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs HTSF Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs TERA Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs SPLY Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS and SPLY have similar daily volatility (196.04).
CLIS vs IPUB Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs RIVX Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS and RIVX have similar daily volatility (196.04).
CLIS vs SPYR Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 351. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.
CLIS vs GBNW Comparison
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.