ClickStream Corporation
ClickStream Corporation (CLIS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLIS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIS | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 34.3K | -0.00 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| NETTF | $24.03 | +2.74% | 76.1B | 15.81 | $1.52 | +2.53% |
| NTDOF | $55.55 | -1.50% | 65.5B | 27.06 | $2.08 | +1.51% |
| NTDOY | $13.85 | -0.93% | 65.2B | 26.92 | $0.52 | +1.00% |
| NEXOF | $25.50 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 31.88 | $0.80 | +1.16% |
| KONMY | $62.10 | -0.47% | 16.5B | 29.43 | $2.07 | +0.91% |
| NEXOY | $20.88 | +0.77% | 16.4B | 27.51 | $0.75 | +1.12% |
| BLBLF | $31.00 | +38.52% | 10.7B | 98.38 | $0.26 | N/A |
| CCOEY | $10.07 | -0.40% | 8.5B | 21.56 | $0.47 | +1.39% |
| CCOEF | $20.05 | -18.23% | 7.9B | 20.00 | $0.95 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
CLIS vs NETTF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NETTF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NETTF's competition here
CLIS vs NTDOF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NTDOF has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NTDOF trades at $55.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTDOF's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NTDOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NTDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NTDOF's competition here
CLIS vs NTDOY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NTDOY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NTDOY's competition here
CLIS vs NEXOF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NEXOF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NEXOF's competition here
CLIS vs KONMY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KONMY trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check KONMY's competition here
CLIS vs NEXOY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NEXOY trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NEXOY's competition here
CLIS vs BLBLF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BLBLF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is 98.38. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check BLBLF's competition here
CLIS vs CCOEY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while CCOEY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check CCOEY's competition here
CLIS vs CCOEF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while CCOEF trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check CCOEF's competition here
CLIS vs OTGLF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while OTGLF trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 43.59. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check OTGLF's competition here
CLIS vs OTGLY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while OTGLY trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check OTGLY's competition here
CLIS vs SQNNY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SQNNY trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SQNNY's competition here
CLIS vs SQNXF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SQNXF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SQNXF's competition here
CLIS vs KSFTF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KSFTF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check KSFTF's competition here
CLIS vs SGAMF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SGAMF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SGAMF's competition here
CLIS vs SGAMY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SGAMY trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SGAMY's competition here
CLIS vs KYYWF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check KYYWF's competition here
CLIS vs DNACF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while DNACF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to DNACF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check DNACF's competition here
CLIS vs MIXIF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while MIXIF trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check MIXIF's competition here
CLIS vs PRXXF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PRXXF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 106.92. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check PRXXF's competition here
CLIS vs KYYWY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check KYYWY's competition here
CLIS vs XDNCF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check XDNCF's competition here
CLIS vs THQQF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while THQQF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to THQQF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check THQQF's competition here
CLIS vs GUNGF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GUNGF trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GUNGF's competition here
CLIS vs RVTTY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check RVTTY's competition here
CLIS vs UBSFF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 673.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while UBSFF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check UBSFF's competition here
CLIS vs UBSFY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while UBSFY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check UBSFY's competition here
CLIS vs GREZF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 542.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GREZF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GREZF's competition here
CLIS vs IGGGF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 488.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IGGGF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check IGGGF's competition here
CLIS vs BOYAF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BOYAF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check BOYAF's competition here
CLIS vs SCFR Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SCFR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SCFR's competition here
CLIS vs FRRDF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FRRDF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check FRRDF's competition here
CLIS vs STLFF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while STLFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check STLFF's competition here
CLIS vs RMDEF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while RMDEF trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check RMDEF's competition here
CLIS vs AKAFF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check AKAFF's competition here
CLIS vs ENADF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ENADF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check ENADF's competition here
CLIS vs GBNW Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GBNW's competition here
CLIS vs GENTF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GENTF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GENTF's competition here
CLIS vs PONGF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PONGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check PONGF's competition here
CLIS vs VSQTF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while VSQTF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check VSQTF's competition here
CLIS vs POPRF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check POPRF's competition here
CLIS vs FGRTF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check FGRTF's competition here
CLIS vs GAMGF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GAMGF's competition here
CLIS vs IDGAF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IDGAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check IDGAF's competition here
CLIS vs EAGRF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while EAGRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check EAGRF's competition here
CLIS vs SMPBF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SMPBF's competition here
CLIS vs SCTGF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SCTGF's competition here
CLIS vs WIGAF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check WIGAF's competition here
CLIS vs ZUKI Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ZUKI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check ZUKI's competition here
CLIS vs NVNT Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +5.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NVNT's competition here
CLIS vs YDRMF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check YDRMF's competition here
CLIS vs GGAMF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GGAMF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GGAMF's competition here
CLIS vs APETF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while APETF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to APETF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check APETF's competition here
CLIS vs SRVTF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SRVTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SRVTF's competition here
CLIS vs PRYNF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check PRYNF's competition here
CLIS vs SWMIF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SWMIF's competition here
CLIS vs BCDMF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 730.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check BCDMF's competition here
CLIS vs IMGX Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check IMGX's competition here
CLIS vs FRZT Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 600.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check FRZT's competition here
CLIS vs ATIG Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 593K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check ATIG's competition here
CLIS vs GMETF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 570.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GMETF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GMETF's competition here
CLIS vs TAPM Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 408.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TAPM trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check TAPM's competition here
CLIS vs IENT Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check IENT's competition here
CLIS vs KSMRF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 235.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check KSMRF's competition here
CLIS vs EPYFF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 234.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check EPYFF's competition here
CLIS vs WGRFF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 229.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check WGRFF's competition here
CLIS vs TIIDF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check TIIDF's competition here
CLIS vs PLGC Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check PLGC's competition here
CLIS vs SPYR Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 70.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SPYR's competition here
CLIS vs COUV Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check COUV's competition here
CLIS vs STIE Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 34K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check STIE's competition here
CLIS vs GMGT Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 27.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check GMGT's competition here
CLIS vs BLITF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 22.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check BLITF's competition here
CLIS vs NTEK Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to NTEK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check NTEK's competition here
CLIS vs LIVC Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check LIVC's competition here
CLIS vs WINRW Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to WINRW's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check WINRW's competition here
CLIS vs ADTR Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check ADTR's competition here
CLIS vs ENDRF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while ENDRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is less volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check ENDRF's competition here
CLIS vs AXNVF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check AXNVF's competition here
CLIS vs VRVR Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +7.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check VRVR's competition here
CLIS vs WINR Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to WINR's ROE of -53.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check WINR's competition here
CLIS vs HTSF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check HTSF's competition here
CLIS vs TERA Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check TERA's competition here
CLIS vs BLKCF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check BLKCF's competition here
CLIS vs SPLY Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check SPLY's competition here
CLIS vs IPUB Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check IPUB's competition here
CLIS vs FASDF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 840. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +17.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check FASDF's competition here
CLIS vs RIVX Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +15.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check RIVX's competition here
CLIS vs YVRLF Comparison February 2026
CLIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIS stands at 34.3K. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483. Regarding current trading prices, CLIS is priced at $0.00, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLIS's ROE is -2.95%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIS is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIS.Check YVRLF's competition here