Alcanna Inc.
Alcanna Inc. (CLIQ.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLIQ.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIQ.TO | CA$9.05 | -1.20% | 0 | 8.87 | CA$1.02 | N/A |
| AMZN.NE | CA$24.18 | -0.29% | 3T | 40.30 | CA$0.60 | N/A |
| ATD.TO | CA$78.30 | -0.43% | 72.5B | 19.43 | CA$4.03 | +1.05% |
| CTC-A.TO | CA$189.22 | +0.23% | 10B | 17.88 | CA$10.58 | +3.77% |
| CTC.TO | CA$208.88 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 19.76 | CA$10.57 | +3.77% |
| LNF.TO | CA$26.00 | -1.48% | 1.8B | 11.35 | CA$2.29 | +5.46% |
| PET.TO | CA$21.13 | -1.22% | 1.5B | 15.20 | CA$1.39 | +2.32% |
| ZZZ.TO | CA$35.00 | +0.03% | 1.2B | 16.83 | CA$2.08 | +2.71% |
| KITS.TO | CA$15.36 | -2.85% | 522M | 170.67 | CA$0.09 | N/A |
| GBT.TO | CA$12.60 | +3.96% | 402.6M | 14.00 | CA$0.90 | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
CLIQ.TO vs AMZN.NE Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AMZN.NE has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while AMZN.NE trades at CA$24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas AMZN.NE's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMZN.NE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to AMZN.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check AMZN.NE's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs ATD.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ATD.TO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while ATD.TO trades at CA$78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas ATD.TO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ATD.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to ATD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check ATD.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs CTC-A.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CTC-A.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while CTC-A.TO trades at CA$189.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas CTC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CTC-A.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to CTC-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check CTC-A.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs CTC.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CTC.TO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while CTC.TO trades at CA$208.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas CTC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CTC.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to CTC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check CTC.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs LNF.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LNF.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while LNF.TO trades at CA$26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas LNF.TO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to LNF.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to LNF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check LNF.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs PET.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PET.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while PET.TO trades at CA$21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas PET.TO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PET.TO's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to PET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check PET.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs ZZZ.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ZZZ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while ZZZ.TO trades at CA$35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas ZZZ.TO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ZZZ.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to ZZZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check ZZZ.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs KITS.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, KITS.TO has a market cap of 522M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while KITS.TO trades at CA$15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas KITS.TO's P/E ratio is 170.67. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KITS.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to KITS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check KITS.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs GBT.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GBT.TO has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while GBT.TO trades at CA$12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas GBT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GBT.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to GBT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check GBT.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs IDG.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IDG.TO has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while IDG.TO trades at CA$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas IDG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to IDG.TO's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to IDG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check IDG.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs AMB.CN Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AMB.CN has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while AMB.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas AMB.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMB.CN's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to AMB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check AMB.CN's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs CCR.CN Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CCR.CN has a market cap of 684.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while CCR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas CCR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CCR.CN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to CCR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check CCR.CN's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs LXR.TO Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LXR.TO has a market cap of 457.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while LXR.TO trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas LXR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to LXR.TO's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is less volatile compared to LXR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check LXR.TO's competition here
CLIQ.TO vs VEGA.CN Comparison April 2026
CLIQ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLIQ.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VEGA.CN has a market cap of 359.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLIQ.TO is priced at CA$9.05, while VEGA.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLIQ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas VEGA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CLIQ.TO's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VEGA.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLIQ.TO is more volatile compared to VEGA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLIQ.TO.Check VEGA.CN's competition here