CapitaLand Investment Limited
CapitaLand Investment Limited CLILF Peers
See (CLILF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLILF | $2.10 | +6.35% | 10.5B | 30.00 | $0.07 | +4.42% |
| VNNVF | $35.20 | +0.01% | 30.2B | -36.46 | -$0.99 | +3.98% |
| VONOY | $17.26 | -1.76% | 29.3B | -36.31 | -$0.49 | +3.73% |
| CLNXF | $38.77 | +0.70% | 27.4B | -553.86 | -$0.07 | +0.19% |
| VTAGY | $20.36 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +4.02% |
| VTWRF | $40.06 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 40.06 | $1.00 | +3.72% |
| SURDF | $38.64 | +0.21% | 18.2B | 13.85 | $2.79 | +1.23% |
| SWPFF | $2.32 | +3.11% | 13.4B | -116.00 | -$0.02 | +6.09% |
| SURYY | $17.00 | +0.01% | 12.3B | 9.32 | $1.40 | N/A |
| IFSUF | $12.21 | -0.04% | 12B | 29.32 | $0.44 | +4.47% |
Stock Comparison
CLILF vs VNNVF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while VNNVF trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -36.46. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and VNNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs VONOY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while VONOY trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -36.31. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs CLNXF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CLNXF trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -553.86. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and CLNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs VTAGY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and VTAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs VTWRF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and VTWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SURDF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SURDF trades at $38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SURDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SWPFF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SWPFF trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SWPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SURYY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SURYY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SURYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs IFSUF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while IFSUF trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and IFSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs WRFRF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while WRFRF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 71.13. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and WRFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs AZRGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and AZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs HULCF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while HULCF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and HULCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SWPRF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SWPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs LEGIF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while LEGIF trades at $82.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and LEGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ESRCF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ESRCF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ESRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs LGMMY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and LGMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs NXDCF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while NXDCF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -133.62. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and NXDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SCOTF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SCOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs HLPPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while HLPPF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and HLPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs NMEHF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while NMEHF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and NMEHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs HLPPY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while HLPPY trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs SSSAF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SSSAF trades at $43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SSSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs AANNF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while AANNF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and AANNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs CWSRF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CWSRF trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 89.27. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and CWSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs TYTMF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while TYTMF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and TYTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs TAGYY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and TAGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs TAGOF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while TAGOF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and TAGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs IWGFF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while IWGFF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 145.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and IWGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs FBGGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while FBGGF trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 81.03. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and FBGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs VGPBF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while VGPBF trades at $100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and VGPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs CTRGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and CTRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs CGSHY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and CGSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs GRGTF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while GRGTF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and GRGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs EVGPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while EVGPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and EVGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs CNPPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and CNPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SRRLF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SRRLF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SRRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs HYSNF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and HYSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs GRNNF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while GRNNF trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and GRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs WIHLY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and WIHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs DUSCF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and DUSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs GRDDY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and GRDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SVLPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SVLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ASGTF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ASGTF trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 438.63. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ASGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ENTOF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ENTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs FBGBY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and FBGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MEQYF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MEQYF trades at $137.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MEQYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ICHIF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ICHIF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ICHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ACNDF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ACNDF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ACNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs VIBVY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and VIBVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs GRMHF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and GRMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SVAUF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 970.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SVAUF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SVAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs RLHPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and RLHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs HYSNY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 903.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while HYSNY trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 352.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs SSHLF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 874.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SSHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MMHTF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MMHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs PTLKF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and PTLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SSHLY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 630.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SSHLY trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs GBCEY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and GBCEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs KWLGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and KWLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs JPPSF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and JPPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SHMSF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SHMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs LSLPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 331.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while LSLPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and LSLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs SOHOF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SOHOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SOHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MDTWF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MDTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs DLMI Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while DLMI trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and DLMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MDPCF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MDPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs FXTGY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and FXTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs NTPIF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while NTPIF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs SDWHF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and SDWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs RNHEF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and RNHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs FCRIF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and FCRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MRFGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs BREUF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while BREUF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -18.91. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and BREUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs TPRP Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while TPRP trades at $25,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 335.78. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and TPRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MHIVF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MHIVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs AZLCZ Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while AZLCZ trades at $1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs OJOC Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and OJOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs PKTEF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while PKTEF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -41.40. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and PKTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs BVERS Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while BVERS trades at $3,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and BVERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs CRSS Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs CPTP Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while CPTP trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs ADPPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ADPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs TNHDF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and TNHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MDICF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MDICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs LGYSF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and LGYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ABCP Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ABCP trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs ASPZ Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ASPZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ASPZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MNGGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MNGGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.
CLILF vs DIVVZ Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and DIVVZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs BCKMF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and BCKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ATTGF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ATTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs TRPTF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while TRPTF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and TRPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MGAG Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MGAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs PCPDF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and PCPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ADHLF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and ADHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs PRPPF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and PRPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MSGNF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MSGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs MBHCF Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MBHCF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while MBHCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MBHCF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF and MBHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLILF vs ZDPY Comparison
CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZDPY has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.10, while ZDPY trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ZDPY's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZDPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ZDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.