CapitaLand Investment Limited

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CLNXF trades at $38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -482.25. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CLNXF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while VNNVF trades at $30.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -30.71. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check VNNVF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while VONOY trades at $16.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -30.32. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check VONOY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to VTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check VTAGY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while VTWRF trades at $40.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check VTWRF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SURDF trades at $38.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SURDF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SURYY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SURYY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SWPFF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -129.75. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SWPFF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while IFSUF trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check IFSUF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SWPRF trades at $135.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SWPRF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while WRFRF trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check WRFRF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check AZRGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while HULCF trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check HULCF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ESRCF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ESRCF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while LEGIF trades at $84.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check LEGIF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to LGMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check LGMMY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while NXDCF trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -129.86. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check NXDCF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SCOTF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while HLPPF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to HLPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check HLPPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while NMEHF trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to NMEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check NMEHF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while HLPPY trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check HLPPY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SSSAF trades at $43.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SSSAF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to TAGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check TAGYY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while AANNF trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check AANNF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CWSRF trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 85.96. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CWSRF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while TYTMF trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check TYTMF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while IWGFF trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 147.50. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check IWGFF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while TAGOF trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check TAGOF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while VGPBF trades at $104.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check VGPBF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CTRGF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CTRGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to CGSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CGSHY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CNPPF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CNPPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while FBGGF trades at $7.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check FBGGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while GRNNF trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check GRNNF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ENTOF trades at $11.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ENTOF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SRRLF trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SRRLF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while WIHLY trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to WIHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check WIHLY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while GRGTF trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check GRGTF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while GRDDY trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check GRDDY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SVLPF trades at $13.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SVLPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ASGTF trades at $41.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 514.25. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to ASGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ASGTF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while DUSCF trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to DUSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check DUSCF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while HYSNF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check HYSNF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while EVGPF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check EVGPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to FBGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check FBGBY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MEQYF trades at $133.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MEQYF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SVAUF trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SVAUF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ACNDF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ACNDF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ICHIF trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ICHIF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to VIBVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check VIBVY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 988.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while HYSNY trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 385.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check HYSNY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check GRMHF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to RLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check RLHPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MMHTF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 708.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check PTLKF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 665.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SSHLY trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SSHLY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SSHLF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to GBCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check GBCEY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to KWLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check KWLGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to JPPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check JPPSF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while LSLPF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check LSLPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while DLMI trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check DLMI's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 324.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to MDTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MDTWF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SHMSF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SHMSF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to MDPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MDPCF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while FXTGY trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check FXTGY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while NTPIF trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check NTPIF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SOHOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SOHOF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to SDWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check SDWHF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while RNHEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check RNHEF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to FCRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check FCRIF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to MRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MRFGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MSGNF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MSGNF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MSGNF's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSGNF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MSGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MSGNF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while TPRP trades at $21,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 454.55. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check TPRP's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while BREUF trades at $11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check BREUF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 100.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while AZLCZ trades at $1,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check AZLCZ's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while PKTEF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check PKTEF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while OJOC trades at $335.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check OJOC's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MHIVF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MHIVF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CPTP trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CPTP's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while BVERS trades at $3,050.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to BVERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check BVERS's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while CRSS trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check CRSS's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ADPPF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ADPPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while TNHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to TNHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check TNHDF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MDICF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to MDICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MDICF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to LGYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check LGYSF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ABCP trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ABCP's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MNGGF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MNGGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ASPZ trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ASPZ's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ADHLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ADHLF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to DIVVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check DIVVZ's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to BCKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check BCKMF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ATTGF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while TRPTF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to TRPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check TRPTF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MGAG trades at $300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MGAG's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while PCPDF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check PCPDF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PRPPF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while PRPPF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas PRPPF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRPPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to PRPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check PRPPF's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ZDPY has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while ZDPY trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas ZDPY's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZDPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is less volatile compared to ZDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check ZDPY's competition here

CLILF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLILF stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MBHCF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLILF is priced at $2.09, while MBHCF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLILF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.86, whereas MBHCF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CLILF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBHCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLILF is more volatile compared to MBHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLILF.Check MBHCF's competition here