Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares CLDL Peers
See (CLDL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDL | $14.27 | -0.28% | 5.7M | 40.84 | $0.35 | +0.05% |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTAPX | $25.04 | -0.12% | 58.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.74% |
| VTIP | $49.85 | -0.18% | 58.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.77% |
| VFSTX | $10.40 | -0.19% | 52.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.29% |
| VFSUX | $10.40 | -0.19% | 52.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.39% |
| VSBSX | $19.49 | -0.05% | 27.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.16% |
| VGSH | $58.32 | -0.17% | 27.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.19% |
| VWSTX | $15.78 | N/A | 15.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
CLDL vs FIYY Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FFEU Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VTAPX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VTAPX trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VTIP Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VTIP trades at $49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VFSTX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VFSTX trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VFSUX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VFSUX trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VSBSX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VSBSX trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VGSH Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VGSH trades at $58.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VWSTX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VWSTX trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs MINT Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while MINT trades at $100.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs ASBFX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while ASBFX trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SCHO Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SCHO trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs PTSHX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while PTSHX trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FTSM Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FTSM trades at $59.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FNGU Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FNGU trades at $353.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VFISX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VFISX trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SPTS Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SPTS trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SPXL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SPXL trades at $158.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TMF Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TMF trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VSGBX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VSGBX trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs VSGDX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while VSGDX trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs JSDHX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while JSDHX trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FLVCX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FLVCX trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TECL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TECL trades at $78.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 46.80. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs BITX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while BITX trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TBLL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TBLL trades at $105.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FAS Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FAS trades at $159.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs PAIAX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while PAIAX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FSTTX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FSTTX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DHFCX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DIAYX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DIAYX trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DHLSX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DHLSX trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DWT Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs ORSTX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SH Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SH trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs PRFSX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while PRFSX trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs BASOX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while BASOX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs BULZ Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while BULZ trades at $146.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs ACSNX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while ACSNX trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs CPLSX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while CPLSX trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs RYVLX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while RYVLX trades at $542.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TAFI Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 781M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TAFI trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs EMAIX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 740.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while EMAIX trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SOXS Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 731.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SOXS trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs EXMAX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 730.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while EXMAX trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs RYVYX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 684.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while RYVYX trades at $542.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs RYCCX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 684.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while RYCCX trades at $380.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TUA Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 654.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TUA trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SVXY Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 600.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SVXY trades at $41.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs NVDX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while NVDX trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs JSCP Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 589.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while JSCP trades at $46.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DPST Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 584M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DPST trades at $80.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs PSQ Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 556.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while PSQ trades at $35.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs GDXU Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while GDXU trades at $74.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SPXU Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 530.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SPXU trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs BPRRX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 520.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while BPRRX trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs NUGT Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 514.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while NUGT trades at $73.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs BPIRX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 505.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while BPIRX trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DGAZ Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs GIYAX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while GIYAX trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FNGO Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 478.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FNGO trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FSMB Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 455.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FSMB trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs KOLD Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 434M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while KOLD trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SDS Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 420.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SDS trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SPXS Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SPXS trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SDHY Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SDHY trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DXQLX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DXQLX trades at $92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SEMRX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SEMRX trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FSHSX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FSHSX trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs UVXY Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while UVXY trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DUST Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DUST trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SVIX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 329M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SVIX trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs MRRL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FLGE Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs JNUG Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while JNUG trades at $83.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs MORL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs UUP Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 281.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while UUP trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SMB Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SMB trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TZA Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TZA trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs QID Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 263.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while QID trades at $27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs NAIL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while NAIL trades at $48.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs GGLL Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while GGLL trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs STOT Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 234.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while STOT trades at $47.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs GUSH Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while GUSH trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TENG Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FTSD Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FTSD trades at $90.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TWUSX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TWUSX trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs REML Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs AMZU Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while AMZU trades at $35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs ERX Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while ERX trades at $49.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SDOW Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SDOW trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs FUMB Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while FUMB trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs EMNT Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while EMNT trades at $98.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs RWM Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while RWM trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs CVSB Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while CVSB trades at $50.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs DFEN Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while DFEN trades at $47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 47.29. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs USDU Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while USDU trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs TMV Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while TMV trades at $40.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.
CLDL vs SPDN Comparison
CLDL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDL stands at 5.7M. In comparison, SPDN has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDL is priced at $14.27, while SPDN trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDL currently has a P/E ratio of 40.84, whereas SPDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDL is more volatile compared to SPDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDL.