CLC Industries Limited
CLC Industries Limited (CLCIND.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLCIND.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Textiles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLCIND.NS | ₹18.53 | +4.99% | 192.6M | -0.39 | -₹48.09 | N/A |
| ALOKINDS.BO | ₹12.48 | +0.40% | 62B | -9.90 | -₹1.26 | N/A |
| SANATHAN.NS | ₹419.20 | +6.71% | 35.4B | 35.65 | ₹11.76 | N/A |
| PASHUPATI.NS | ₹980.90 | -0.46% | 15.5B | 104.57 | ₹9.38 | +0.05% |
| BPAGRI.BO | ₹21.11 | -5.00% | 12.7B | -0.55 | -₹38.36 | N/A |
| RAJRILTD.BO | ₹20.39 | +0.30% | 11.3B | 48.55 | ₹0.42 | N/A |
| ABCOTS.NS | ₹404.00 | +0.34% | 8.9B | 59.06 | ₹6.84 | N/A |
| BORANA.NS | ₹299.65 | -2.33% | 8B | 33.90 | ₹8.84 | N/A |
| SUNRAKSHAK.BO | ₹237.95 | +1.95% | 7.4B | 23.17 | ₹10.27 | N/A |
| TRUEGREEN.BO | ₹132.60 | -2.00% | 4.4B | -457.24 | -₹0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLCIND.NS vs ALOKINDS.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, ALOKINDS.BO has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while ALOKINDS.BO trades at ₹12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas ALOKINDS.BO's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ALOKINDS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check ALOKINDS.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs SANATHAN.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, SANATHAN.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while SANATHAN.NS trades at ₹419.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas SANATHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SANATHAN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to SANATHAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check SANATHAN.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs PASHUPATI.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, PASHUPATI.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while PASHUPATI.NS trades at ₹980.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas PASHUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 104.57. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to PASHUPATI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to PASHUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check PASHUPATI.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs BPAGRI.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, BPAGRI.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while BPAGRI.BO trades at ₹21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas BPAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to BPAGRI.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS and BPAGRI.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPAGRI.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs RAJRILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, RAJRILTD.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while RAJRILTD.BO trades at ₹20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas RAJRILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to RAJRILTD.BO's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRILTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check RAJRILTD.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs ABCOTS.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, ABCOTS.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while ABCOTS.NS trades at ₹404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas ABCOTS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.06. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ABCOTS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to ABCOTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check ABCOTS.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs BORANA.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, BORANA.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while BORANA.NS trades at ₹299.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas BORANA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to BORANA.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to BORANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check BORANA.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs SUNRAKSHAK.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, SUNRAKSHAK.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while SUNRAKSHAK.BO trades at ₹237.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas SUNRAKSHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SUNRAKSHAK.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to SUNRAKSHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check SUNRAKSHAK.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs TRUEGREEN.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, TRUEGREEN.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while TRUEGREEN.BO trades at ₹132.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas TRUEGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is -457.24. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to TRUEGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS and TRUEGREEN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRUEGREEN.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs BELLACASA.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, BELLACASA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while BELLACASA.NS trades at ₹249.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas BELLACASA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to BELLACASA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to BELLACASA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check BELLACASA.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs AGRIBIO.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, AGRIBIO.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while AGRIBIO.BO trades at ₹263.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas AGRIBIO.BO's P/E ratio is 75.85. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AGRIBIO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to AGRIBIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check AGRIBIO.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs RUDRAECO.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, RUDRAECO.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while RUDRAECO.BO trades at ₹18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas RUDRAECO.BO's P/E ratio is -78.57. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to RUDRAECO.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to RUDRAECO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check RUDRAECO.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs SHIVATEX.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, SHIVATEX.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while SHIVATEX.BO trades at ₹138.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas SHIVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SHIVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check SHIVATEX.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs RNBDENIMS.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, RNBDENIMS.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while RNBDENIMS.NS trades at ₹19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas RNBDENIMS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to RNBDENIMS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS and RNBDENIMS.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNBDENIMS.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs SALONA.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, SALONA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while SALONA.BO trades at ₹280.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas SALONA.BO's P/E ratio is 117.02. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SALONA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to SALONA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check SALONA.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs VGL.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, VGL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while VGL.NS trades at ₹50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas VGL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to VGL.NS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to VGL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check VGL.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs VGL.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, VGL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while VGL.BO trades at ₹50.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas VGL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to VGL.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to VGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check VGL.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs SELMC.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, SELMC.BO has a market cap of 931.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while SELMC.BO trades at ₹28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas SELMC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SELMC.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to SELMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check SELMC.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs DIGJAMLMTD.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.BO has a market cap of 783.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while DIGJAMLMTD.BO trades at ₹39.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.BO's P/E ratio is 48.99. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check DIGJAMLMTD.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs DAMODARIND.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, DAMODARIND.BO has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while DAMODARIND.BO trades at ₹21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas DAMODARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DAMODARIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to DAMODARIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check DAMODARIND.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs SHEKHAWATI.NS Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, SHEKHAWATI.NS has a market cap of 344.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while SHEKHAWATI.NS trades at ₹10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas SHEKHAWATI.NS's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SHEKHAWATI.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS is less volatile compared to SHEKHAWATI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLCIND.NS.Check SHEKHAWATI.NS's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs TACENT.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, TACENT.BO has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while TACENT.BO trades at ₹40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas TACENT.BO's P/E ratio is -2022.00. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to TACENT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS and TACENT.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACENT.BO's competition here
CLCIND.NS vs KRIFILIND.BO Comparison April 2026
CLCIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLCIND.NS stands at 192.6M. In comparison, KRIFILIND.BO has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLCIND.NS is priced at ₹18.53, while KRIFILIND.BO trades at ₹5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLCIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.39, whereas KRIFILIND.BO's P/E ratio is -64.00. In terms of profitability, CLCIND.NS's ROE is -1.17%, compared to KRIFILIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLCIND.NS and KRIFILIND.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRIFILIND.BO's competition here