CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited
CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited (CKISF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CKISF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKISF | $6.66 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 15.49 | $0.43 | +4.98% |
| NGGTF | $14.38 | -4.24% | 72.6B | 18.07 | $0.81 | +4.20% |
| ELEZY | $14.97 | +0.23% | 32.2B | 12.69 | $1.20 | +3.17% |
| ELEZF | $30.05 | +0.00% | 31.8B | 12.47 | $2.41 | +4.23% |
| NSARO | $77.00 | +0.00% | 28.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| AILIO | $69.98 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| AILIP | $69.00 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| NSARP | $70.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.21% |
| CLPHY | $8.50 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 14.43 | $0.59 | +4.45% |
| HRNNF | $35.53 | -0.81% | 21.3B | 24.01 | $1.48 | +3.07% |
Stock Comparison
CKISF vs NGGTF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while NGGTF trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check NGGTF's competition here
CKISF vs ELEZY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ELEZY trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check ELEZY's competition here
CKISF vs ELEZF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ELEZF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEZF's competition here
CKISF vs NSARO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while NSARO trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
CKISF vs AILIO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
CKISF vs AILIP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while AILIP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check AILIP's competition here
CKISF vs NSARP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while NSARP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
CKISF vs CLPHY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CLPHY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check CLPHY's competition here
CKISF vs HRNNF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HRNNF trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and HRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRNNF's competition here
CKISF vs TNABY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while TNABY trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check TNABY's competition here
CKISF vs TERRF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while TERRF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and TERRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TERRF's competition here
CKISF vs CLPHF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CLPHF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
CKISF vs TEZNY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while TEZNY trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check TEZNY's competition here
CKISF vs TNABF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while TNABF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check TNABF's competition here
CKISF vs CKISY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CKISY trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CKISY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISY's competition here
CKISF vs EMRAF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check EMRAF's competition here
CKISF vs ELIAF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ELIAF trades at $121.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and ELIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIAF's competition here
CKISF vs RDEIY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while RDEIY trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check RDEIY's competition here
CKISF vs MAEOY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check MAEOY's competition here
CKISF vs UEPCO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPCO trades at $97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check UEPCO's competition here
CKISF vs FTRSF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while FTRSF trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and FTRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTRSF's competition here
CKISF vs HPIFF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
CKISF vs EQUEY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EQUEY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQUEY's competition here
CKISF vs UEPCN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
CKISF vs HPIFY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HPIFY's competition here
CKISF vs UEPEO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPEO trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and UEPEO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEO's competition here
CKISF vs UEPEP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPEP trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and UEPEP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEP's competition here
CKISF vs FORFF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while FORFF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
CKISF vs UEPCP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPCP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
CKISF vs HKVTY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKVTY's competition here
CKISF vs UEPEM Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPEM trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and UEPEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEM's competition here
CKISF vs EGIEY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EGIEY trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check EGIEY's competition here
CKISF vs ABZPF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check ABZPF's competition here
CKISF vs UEPEN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while UEPEN trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEN's competition here
CKISF vs HKCVF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
CKISF vs CPWIF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CPWIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWIF's competition here
CKISF vs IESFY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while IESFY trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and IESFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IESFY's competition here
CKISF vs PGPKY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while PGPKY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPKY's competition here
CKISF vs WELPM Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
CKISF vs ABOIF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check ABOIF's competition here
CKISF vs WELPP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while WELPP trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check WELPP's competition here
CKISF vs AILLM Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while AILLM trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
CKISF vs AILLN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while AILLN trades at $78.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
CKISF vs AILIN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while AILIN trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
CKISF vs AILLP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while AILLP trades at $68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check AILLP's competition here
CKISF vs RGPCF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check RGPCF's competition here
CKISF vs FPHHF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
CKISF vs CUPUF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CUPUF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUPUF's competition here
CKISF vs RELFF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
CKISF vs ABTZY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ABTZY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
CKISF vs CNLPL Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLPL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check CNLPL's competition here
CKISF vs CNTHP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNTHP trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNTHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHP's competition here
CKISF vs CNTHO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 257.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNTHO trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
CKISF vs ABZPY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check ABZPY's competition here
CKISF vs CNTHN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNTHN trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHN's competition here
CKISF vs CNLHO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLHO trades at $36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check CNLHO's competition here
CKISF vs CNLHP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLHP trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNLHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHP's competition here
CKISF vs CNLTP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLTP trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check CNLTP's competition here
CKISF vs CNLPM Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLPM trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPM's competition here
CKISF vs CNLHN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHN's competition here
CKISF vs CNLTN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLTN trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTN's competition here
CKISF vs CNLTL Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while CNLTL trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTL's competition here
CKISF vs EDCFF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDCFF's competition here
CKISF vs NZWFF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
CKISF vs SUME Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while SUME trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUME's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
CKISF vs MCPB Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCPB's competition here
CKISF vs EUSP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 822.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EUSP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check EUSP's competition here
CKISF vs HAWLM Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWLM trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
CKISF vs HAWEM Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 728.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HAWEM's competition here
CKISF vs HAWEL Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 728K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWEL trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HAWEL's competition here
CKISF vs HAWLL Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 727.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWLL trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HAWLL's competition here
CKISF vs HAWLN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 725K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWLN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HAWLN's competition here
CKISF vs HAWEN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HAWEN's competition here
CKISF vs HAWLI Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 694.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while HAWLI trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check HAWLI's competition here
CKISF vs RIGH Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and RIGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIGH's competition here
CKISF vs USWF Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
CKISF vs RENU Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and RENU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RENU's competition here
CKISF vs EPGRQ Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
CKISF vs IPWLG Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
CKISF vs IPWLP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
CKISF vs EVSO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check EVSO's competition here
CKISF vs BANGN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here
CKISF vs PNMXO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while PNMXO trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check PNMXO's competition here
CKISF vs IPWLN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLN's competition here
CKISF vs ENIAY Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check ENIAY's competition here
CKISF vs NMPWP Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here
CKISF vs NEWEN Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while NEWEN trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF is less volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKISF.Check NEWEN's competition here
CKISF vs IPWLO Comparison July 2025
CKISF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKISF stands at 16.8B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKISF is priced at $6.66, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKISF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.49, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKISF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CKISF and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here