Capitec Bank Holdings Limited
Capitec Bank Holdings Limited (CKHGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CKHGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKHGF | $166.77 | +34.43% | 19.3B | 28.41 | $5.87 | +2.38% |
| CIHKY | $31.53 | -0.41% | 160.2B | 7.69 | $4.13 | +6.19% |
| CIHHF | $5.65 | +0.00% | 142.5B | 6.89 | $0.82 | +7.48% |
| UNCFF | $86.77 | -0.00% | 136B | 10.66 | $8.17 | +3.81% |
| UNCRY | $42.84 | -1.88% | 135.2B | 10.58 | $4.09 | +3.45% |
| DBSDY | $182.29 | -1.24% | 130B | 15.13 | $12.10 | +4.71% |
| SBKFF | $128.90 | +0.00% | 129.3B | 13.81 | $10.14 | +1.16% |
| DBSDF | $45.48 | -0.73% | 129B | 15.05 | $3.02 | +4.55% |
| BNPQY | $55.38 | -1.67% | 126.4B | 9.25 | $6.11 | +1.98% |
| BNPQF | $110.00 | -4.34% | 122.5B | 9.05 | $12.22 | +7.58% |
Stock Comparison
CKHGF vs CIHKY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 160.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CIHKY trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check CIHKY's competition here
CKHGF vs CIHHF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CIHHF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CIHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIHHF's competition here
CKHGF vs UNCFF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while UNCFF trades at $86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check UNCFF's competition here
CKHGF vs UNCRY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while UNCRY trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check UNCRY's competition here
CKHGF vs DBSDY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while DBSDY trades at $182.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check DBSDY's competition here
CKHGF vs SBKFF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SBKFF trades at $128.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and SBKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBKFF's competition here
CKHGF vs DBSDF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while DBSDF trades at $45.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check DBSDF's competition here
CKHGF vs BNPQY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BNPQY trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BNPQY's competition here
CKHGF vs BNPQF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BNPQF trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BNPQF's competition here
CKHGF vs IITSF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while IITSF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check IITSF's competition here
CKHGF vs MZHOF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 118B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while MZHOF trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check MZHOF's competition here
CKHGF vs KBCSY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while KBCSY trades at $68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check KBCSY's competition here
CKHGF vs EBKDY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while EBKDY trades at $62.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check EBKDY's competition here
CKHGF vs CIXPF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CIXPF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CIXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIXPF's competition here
CKHGF vs CAIXY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CAIXY trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check CAIXY's competition here
CKHGF vs LLDTF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while LLDTF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check LLDTF's competition here
CKHGF vs OVCHY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while OVCHY trades at $33.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check OVCHY's competition here
CKHGF vs BREJY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BREJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BREJY's competition here
CKHGF vs OVCHF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while OVCHF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and OVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVCHF's competition here
CKHGF vs NBNKF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while NBNKF trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and NBNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBNKF's competition here
CKHGF vs JPPTY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while JPPTY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check JPPTY's competition here
CKHGF vs CHBJF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CHBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHBJF's competition here
CKHGF vs JPSTF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while JPSTF trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and JPSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPSTF's competition here
CKHGF vs PSTVY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PSTVY has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PSTVY trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSTVY's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSTVY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to PSTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check PSTVY's competition here
CKHGF vs NRDBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while NRDBY trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check NRDBY's competition here
CKHGF vs SCGLY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SCGLY trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check SCGLY's competition here
CKHGF vs CRARF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CRARF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CRARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRARF's competition here
CKHGF vs AKSJF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKSJF's competition here
CKHGF vs CRARY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CRARY trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check CRARY's competition here
CKHGF vs LLOBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while LLOBF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and LLOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLOBF's competition here
CKHGF vs SCGLF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SCGLF trades at $85.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCGLF's competition here
CKHGF vs PSBKF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PSBKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and PSBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSBKF's competition here
CKHGF vs CHCJY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CHCJY trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CHCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCJY's competition here
CKHGF vs BHKLY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BHKLY trades at $110.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BHKLY's competition here
CKHGF vs BNKHF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BNKHF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BNKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNKHF's competition here
CKHGF vs KBCSF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while KBCSF trades at $138.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBCSF's competition here
CKHGF vs PBCRY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PBCRY trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check PBCRY's competition here
CKHGF vs UOVEF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while UOVEF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and UOVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UOVEF's competition here
CKHGF vs UOVEY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while UOVEY trades at $60.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check UOVEY's competition here
CKHGF vs EBKOF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while EBKOF trades at $126.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check EBKOF's competition here
CKHGF vs MLYBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while MLYBY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and MLYBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYBY's competition here
CKHGF vs DNBBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while DNBBF trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check DNBBF's competition here
CKHGF vs PBCRF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PBCRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and PBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBCRF's competition here
CKHGF vs DNBBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while DNBBY trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check DNBBY's competition here
CKHGF vs STNDF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STNDF's competition here
CKHGF vs CRZBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CRZBY trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check CRZBY's competition here
CKHGF vs DNKEY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while DNKEY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check DNKEY's competition here
CKHGF vs DNSKF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while DNSKF trades at $54.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and DNSKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNSKF's competition here
CKHGF vs SWDBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SWDBY trades at $38.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check SWDBY's competition here
CKHGF vs CRZBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CRZBF trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CRZBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRZBF's competition here
CKHGF vs SWDBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SWDBF trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and SWDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWDBF's competition here
CKHGF vs SVKEF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SVKEF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and SVKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVKEF's competition here
CKHGF vs JPPHY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while JPPHY trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check JPPHY's competition here
CKHGF vs HSNGY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while HSNGY trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check HSNGY's competition here
CKHGF vs BLMIF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BLMIF trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BLMIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLMIF's competition here
CKHGF vs BKRKF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKRKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKRKF's competition here
CKHGF vs PSZKY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PSZKY trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check PSZKY's competition here
CKHGF vs SBGOF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SBGOF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check SBGOF's competition here
CKHGF vs BKHYY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKHYY trades at $130.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BKHYY's competition here
CKHGF vs BKRKY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKRKY trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BKRKY's competition here
CKHGF vs CKHGY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CKHGY trades at $148.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CKHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKHGY's competition here
CKHGF vs OTPBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while OTPBF trades at $105.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPBF's competition here
CKHGF vs JPHLF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while JPHLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and JPHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPHLF's competition here
CKHGF vs PSZKF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PSZKF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSZKF's competition here
CKHGF vs BKHPF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKHPF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BKHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKHPF's competition here
CKHGF vs SGBLY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SGBLY trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check SGBLY's competition here
CKHGF vs GBOOY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while GBOOY trades at $57.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check GBOOY's competition here
CKHGF vs GBOOF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while GBOOF trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check GBOOF's competition here
CKHGF vs PPERF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PPERF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and PPERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPERF's competition here
CKHGF vs MLYNF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while MLYNF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and MLYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYNF's competition here
CKHGF vs HSNGF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while HSNGF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSNGF's competition here
CKHGF vs RSNHF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while RSNHF trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check RSNHF's competition here
CKHGF vs BDORY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BDORY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BDORY's competition here
CKHGF vs PPERY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PPERY trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check PPERY's competition here
CKHGF vs CIMDF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CIMDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CIMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIMDF's competition here
CKHGF vs CEBCF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CEBCF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CEBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEBCF's competition here
CKHGF vs SUTNY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while SUTNY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check SUTNY's competition here
CKHGF vs FCNCB Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while FCNCB trades at $1,670.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check FCNCB's competition here
CKHGF vs CMTDF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CMTDF trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CMTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMTDF's competition here
CKHGF vs BNCZF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BNCZF trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNCZF's competition here
CKHGF vs BPXXY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BPXXY trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BPXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPXXY's competition here
CKHGF vs CMAKY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CMAKY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CMAKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMAKY's competition here
CKHGF vs AIBGY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while AIBGY trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check AIBGY's competition here
CKHGF vs AIBRF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while AIBRF trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and AIBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIBRF's competition here
CKHGF vs CGMBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while CGMBF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and CGMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGMBF's competition here
CKHGF vs MZTFF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MZTFF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while MZTFF trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MZTFF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MZTFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and MZTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MZTFF's competition here
CKHGF vs ISNPY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while ISNPY trades at $40.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check ISNPY's competition here
CKHGF vs BKRIF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKRIF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BKRIF's competition here
CKHGF vs MDIBF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while MDIBF trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and MDIBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDIBF's competition here
CKHGF vs BKRIY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKRIY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check BKRIY's competition here
CKHGF vs MDIBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while MDIBY trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check MDIBY's competition here
CKHGF vs PBLOF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and PBLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBLOF's competition here
CKHGF vs EGFEF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while EGFEF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and EGFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGFEF's competition here
CKHGF vs BKPKF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKPKF trades at $64.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BKPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKPKF's competition here
CKHGF vs BKZHF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BKZHF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BKZHF trades at $45.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BKZHF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BKZHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BKZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKZHF's competition here
CKHGF vs RAIFY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, RAIFY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while RAIFY trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas RAIFY's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAIFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to RAIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check RAIFY's competition here
CKHGF vs RAIFF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, RAIFF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while RAIFF trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas RAIFF's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAIFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and RAIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAIFF's competition here
CKHGF vs BNMDF Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, BNMDF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while BNMDF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas BNMDF's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNMDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF and BNMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNMDF's competition here
CKHGF vs TKGBY Comparison February 2026
CKHGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKHGF stands at 19.3B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKHGF is priced at $166.77, while TKGBY trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, CKHGF's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CKHGF is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKHGF.Check TKGBY's competition here