China Industrial Waste Management, Inc.
China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. CIWT Peers
See (CIWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIWT | $0.85 | +849900.00% | 13M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VEOEY | $17.55 | +0.80% | 25.6B | 19.94 | $0.88 | +5.12% |
| VEOEF | $34.50 | -0.14% | 25.2B | 19.60 | $1.76 | +4.53% |
| TMRAF | $17.29 | N/A | 5.1B | 43.22 | $0.40 | +1.37% |
| TMRAY | $16.00 | +2.89% | 4.8B | 40.00 | $0.40 | +1.49% |
| FMOCF | $10.30 | N/A | 4.7B | 13.92 | $0.74 | +6.26% |
| TSPCF | $1.52 | -20.00% | 3.4B | 30.40 | $0.05 | +1.88% |
| CHFFF | $0.47 | N/A | 2.9B | 6.71 | $0.07 | +6.29% |
| SECYF | $11.56 | +2.82% | 2.6B | 16.75 | $0.69 | +2.49% |
| BFFBF | $9.11 | +2.82% | 1.7B | -92.96 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CIWT vs VEOEY Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, VEOEY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while VEOEY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEOEY's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VEOEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to VEOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs VEOEF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, VEOEF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while VEOEF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEOEF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VEOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to VEOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TMRAF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TMRAF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TMRAF trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMRAF's P/E ratio is 43.22. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TMRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TMRAY Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TMRAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TMRAY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMRAY's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TMRAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TMRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs FMOCF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, FMOCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while FMOCF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMOCF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FMOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to FMOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TSPCF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TSPCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TSPCF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSPCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CHFFF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CHFFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CHFFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CHFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SECYF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SECYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SECYF trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECYF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SECYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SECYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BFFBF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BFFBF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BFFBF trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFFBF's P/E ratio is -92.96. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BFFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BFSAF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BFSAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BFSAF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFSAF's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFSAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BFSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs DSKIF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, DSKIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while DSKIF trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSKIF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DSKIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to DSKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SZDEF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SZDEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SZDEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZDEF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SZDEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SZDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TNJIF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TNJIF has a market cap of 969.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TNJIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNJIF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TNJIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TNJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs FMOCY Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, FMOCY has a market cap of 909.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while FMOCY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMOCY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FMOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to FMOCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SECVY Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SECVY has a market cap of 809.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SECVY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECVY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SECVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SECVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SHMCF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SHMCF has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SHMCF trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMCF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SHMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs AGXXF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, AGXXF has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while AGXXF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGXXF's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGXXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to AGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SCPJ Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SCPJ has a market cap of 297.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SCPJ trades at $325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPJ's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPJ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SCPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CHFFY Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CHFFY has a market cap of 296.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CHFFY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFFY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHFFY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CHFFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs MBRFF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, MBRFF has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while MBRFF trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBRFF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBRFF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to MBRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs QNTFF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, QNTFF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while QNTFF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTFF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QNTFF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to QNTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ANRGF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ANRGF has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ANRGF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANRGF's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANRGF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ANRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs LEIC Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, LEIC has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while LEIC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to LEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BTQNF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BTQNF has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BTQNF trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTQNF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTQNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BTQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ROOOF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ROOOF has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ROOOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROOOF's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ROOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs GCEI Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GCEI has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GCEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCEI's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCEI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs OCLN Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, OCLN has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while OCLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCLN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OCLN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to OCLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CTRNF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CTRNF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CTRNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRNF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTRNF's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CTRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs VCIGF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, VCIGF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while VCIGF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIGF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VCIGF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to VCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SEPOF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SEPOF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SEPOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPOF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEPOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SEPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ECLMF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ECLMF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ECLMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECLMF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECLMF's ROE of -4.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ECLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs HUIPF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, HUIPF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while HUIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUIPF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUIPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to HUIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TESI Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TESI has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TESI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TESI's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TESI's ROE of -13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BCCEF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BCCEF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BCCEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCEF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCCEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BCCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs HNRC Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, HNRC has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while HNRC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to HNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CWSFF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CWSFF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CWSFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWSFF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CWSFF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CWSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs NWLXF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, NWLXF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while NWLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLXF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWLXF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to NWLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs EAATF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, EAATF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while EAATF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAATF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EAATF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to EAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SNRG Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SNRG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SNRG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNRG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs EXPL Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, EXPL has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while EXPL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXPL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to EXPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SENR Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SENR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SENR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SENR's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs EQTE Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, EQTE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while EQTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQTE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to EQTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs AFBG Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, AFBG has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while AFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to AFBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ECEZ Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ECEZ has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ECEZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ECEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs MCIM Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, MCIM has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while MCIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCIM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to MCIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CRVYF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CRVYF has a market cap of 631.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CRVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRVYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRVYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CRVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs GERS Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GERS has a market cap of 565.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GERS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GERS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BWPC Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BWPC has a market cap of 562.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BWPC trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWPC's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWPC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BWPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs DGWR Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, DGWR has a market cap of 243.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while DGWR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGWR's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DGWR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to DGWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ECPL Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ECPL has a market cap of 175.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ECPL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECPL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECPL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ECPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SUNC Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 138.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SUNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs PTOI Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, PTOI has a market cap of 87.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while PTOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTOI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to PTOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs IPWG Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, IPWG has a market cap of 81.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while IPWG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPWG's ROE of -7.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to IPWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs RGDEF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, RGDEF has a market cap of 69.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while RGDEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RGDEF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to RGDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs MJWL Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, MJWL has a market cap of 65.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while MJWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MJWL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to MJWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs GARB Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GARB has a market cap of 47.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GARB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GARB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BEEN Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BEEN has a market cap of 30.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BEEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEEN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BEEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs UVSS Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, UVSS has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while UVSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UVSS's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to UVSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs EVSP Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, EVSP has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while EVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVSP's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to EVSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CLIRF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CLIRF has a market cap of 25.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CLIRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLIRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CLIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs NXSI Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, NXSI has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while NXSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to NXSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs GMND Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GMND has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GMND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMND's ROE of -8.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TMEN Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TMEN has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TMEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TMEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT and TMEN have similar daily volatility (200.00).
CIWT vs GNCC Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GNCC has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GNCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GNCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs EXSO Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, EXSO has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while EXSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXSO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to EXSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs USLQ Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, USLQ has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while USLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to USLQ's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to USLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs NWMH Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, NWMH has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while NWMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWMH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to NWMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs BEHL Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, BEHL has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while BEHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to BEHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ECCI Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ECCI has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ECCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECCI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ECCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs CESX Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, CESX has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while CESX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CESX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to CESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TRITF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TRITF has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TRITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TRITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs JPEX Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, JPEX has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while JPEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPEX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to JPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs GETH Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GETH has a market cap of 314. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GETH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GETH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs TRTI Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, TRTI has a market cap of 298. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while TRTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRTI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to TRTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs SRPX Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, SRPX has a market cap of 206. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while SRPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRPX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to SRPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs GRNO Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, GRNO has a market cap of 92. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while GRNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to GRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs MPHD Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, MPHD has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while MPHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPHD's ROE of -70.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to MPHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ALAN Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ALAN has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ALAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ALAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.
CIWT vs ZWTYF Comparison
CIWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIWT stands at 13M. In comparison, ZWTYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIWT is priced at $0.85, while ZWTYF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIWT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWTYF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, CIWT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZWTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIWT is more volatile compared to ZWTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIWT.