Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco Systems, Inc. CIS.DE Peers
See (CIS.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIS.DE | €59.00 | +0.00% | 231.6B | 27.46 | €2.13 | +2.53% |
| MTLA.DE | €247.80 | +0.00% | 41.4B | 36.82 | €6.73 | N/A |
| ERCB.DE | €7.25 | +0.06% | 24.3B | 182.25 | €0.04 | +1.78% |
| NOA3.DE | €4.41 | -0.05% | 23.7B | 20.00 | €0.22 | +2.69% |
| 2HP.DE | €17.76 | +0.00% | 22.7B | 19.23 | €0.90 | +2.79% |
| ERCG.DE | €7.00 | -2.51% | 21.3B | 175.00 | €0.04 | +1.86% |
| CIE1.DE | €85.74 | -0.21% | 12.3B | 61.68 | €1.39 | N/A |
| JNP.DE | €34.69 | -0.77% | 11.4B | 34.01 | €1.02 | +1.18% |
| ADV.DE | €20.30 | +0.00% | 1.1B | -45.33 | -€0.45 | +2.55% |
| ADVV.F | €16.10 | +0.00% | 837.7M | 15.38 | €1.05 | +2.55% |
Stock Comparison
CIS.DE vs MTLA.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, MTLA.DE has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while MTLA.DE trades at €247.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas MTLA.DE's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTLA.DE's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to MTLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs ERCB.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, ERCB.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while ERCB.DE trades at €7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas ERCB.DE's P/E ratio is 182.25. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERCB.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to ERCB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs NOA3.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, NOA3.DE has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while NOA3.DE trades at €4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas NOA3.DE's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOA3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to NOA3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs 2HP.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, 2HP.DE has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while 2HP.DE trades at €17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas 2HP.DE's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 2HP.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to 2HP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs ERCG.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, ERCG.DE has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while ERCG.DE trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas ERCG.DE's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERCG.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to ERCG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs CIE1.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, CIE1.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while CIE1.DE trades at €85.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas CIE1.DE's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIE1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to CIE1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs JNP.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, JNP.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while JNP.DE trades at €34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas JNP.DE's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JNP.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to JNP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs ADV.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, ADV.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while ADV.DE trades at €20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas ADV.DE's P/E ratio is -45.33. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADV.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to ADV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs ADVV.F Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, ADVV.F has a market cap of 837.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while ADVV.F trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas ADVV.F's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADVV.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to ADVV.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs FQT.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, FQT.DE has a market cap of 663.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while FQT.DE trades at €50.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas FQT.DE's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FQT.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to FQT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs CEK.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, CEK.DE has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while CEK.DE trades at €14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas CEK.DE's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEK.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to CEK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs CEA.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, CEA.DE has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while CEA.DE trades at €8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas CEA.DE's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEA.DE's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to CEA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs TLFP.BE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, TLFP.BE has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while TLFP.BE trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas TLFP.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TLFP.BE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to TLFP.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs CFC.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, CFC.DE has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while CFC.DE trades at €0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas CFC.DE's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFC.DE's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to CFC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs GGS.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, GGS.DE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while GGS.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas GGS.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGS.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to GGS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs TLIK.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, TLIK.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while TLIK.DE trades at €0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas TLIK.DE's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TLIK.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is more volatile compared to TLIK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs M0YN.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, M0YN.DE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while M0YN.DE trades at €0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas M0YN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to M0YN.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to M0YN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.
CIS.DE vs M0Y.DE Comparison
CIS.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIS.DE stands at 231.6B. In comparison, M0Y.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIS.DE is priced at €59.00, while M0Y.DE trades at €28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.46, whereas M0Y.DE's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, CIS.DE's ROE is +0.20%, compared to M0Y.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CIS.DE is less volatile compared to M0Y.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIS.DE.