CITIC Securities Company Limited
CITIC Securities Company Limited CIIHY Peers
See (CIIHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIIHY | $36.25 | +6.93% | 62.4B | 17.18 | $2.11 | +2.01% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 114.2B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +0.53% |
| MQBKY | $149.35 | +0.94% | 57.4B | 20.76 | $7.18 | +2.76% |
| MCQEF | $141.12 | +0.47% | 51.5B | 19.63 | $7.19 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $3.03 | +0.00% | 50.4B | 14.43 | $0.21 | +2.40% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | +0.00% | 31.2B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +4.53% |
| CNICF | $2.95 | +0.00% | 22.2B | 21.07 | $0.14 | +0.85% |
| NRSCF | $6.81 | +7.75% | 20.1B | 9.08 | $0.75 | +5.70% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
CIIHY vs IBKKF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HAITY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MQBKY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while MQBKY trades at $149.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MCQEF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while MCQEF trades at $141.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CIIHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CIIHF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs GUOSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CNICF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CNICF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NRSCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while NRSCF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HTNGF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HUATF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while HUATF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CMSQY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CMSQY trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CMSQF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CMSQF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CGXYY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DSEEY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DSEEY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DSECF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DSECF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs WSOUF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BRPHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IVTJF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IGGHY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while IGGHY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IVTJY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IGGRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CLPE Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FNNTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while FNNTF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs TCAPF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while TCAPF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs LTSAP Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while LTSAP trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MAUSY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while MAUSY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PLSQF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs LTSA Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NHMAF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MNXBF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while MNXBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DEFTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CFNCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CCORF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 836.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CCORF trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -37.09. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CBGPY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CBGPY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CNSRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 796.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CNSRF trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CBGPF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs LKADF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PHIGW Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 680.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PHIG Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 656.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while PHIG trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NAGGF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CSCHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CSCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ABGSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 342.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while ABGSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CESTY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CESTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs APPCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while APPCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs OSHDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CYFRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CYFRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 110.30. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NPPTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while NPPTF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 54.18. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ARCNF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CAGPF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs OZFRY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ABIT Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while ABIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PNPFF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while PNPFF trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs STGC Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs GEVI Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while GEVI trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CURN Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CURN trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.24. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs XAUMF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while XAUMF trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DGTLF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BITCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BITCF has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BITCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BITCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BITCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BITCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DMGGF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DMGGF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs UFFRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HAFG Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while HAFG trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CBTTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FDCT Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while FDCT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BBKCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CMZZF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ARBKF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while ARBKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CRMZ Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CFLSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs EBML Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BULT Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BULT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs SMURF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BCNWF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BCNWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HYHDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while HYHDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MATEF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while MATEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FWAV Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DYNA Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs AVFCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IHLDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while IHLDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DPXCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs TRAA Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ABSOF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while ABSOF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DBKSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while DBKSF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FFTTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ITEX Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while ITEX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BLVDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HIPH Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BTCWF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BTCWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs AAMTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CCPUF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CSTXF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PHIL Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BZRD Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CRKR Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BKBLF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BKLIF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs GBCHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BLQC Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BLQC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BEGI Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 62.4B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $36.25, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is more volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.