CITIC Securities Company Limited
CITIC Securities Company Limited CIIHY Peers
See (CIIHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIIHY | $26.70 | +7.01% | 53.67B | 12.84 | $2.08 | +3.76% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | N/A | 112.26B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| MQBKY | $134.20 | +1.35% | 51.68B | 18.69 | $7.18 | +3.17% |
| CIIHF | $2.55 | N/A | 49.31B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.93% |
| MCQEF | $123.04 | +7.29% | 44.78B | 17.11 | $7.19 | +4.02% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | N/A | 37.96B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +6.12% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.56B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.28% |
| NRSCF | $6.00 | N/A | 17.74B | 7.79 | $0.77 | +0.04% |
| HUATF | $1.25 | N/A | 15.68B | 5.21 | $0.24 | +7.07% |
| CMSQY | $25.34 | -0.24% | 14.90B | 27.25 | $0.93 | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
CIIHY vs IBKKF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MQBKY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 51.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while MQBKY trades at $134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CIIHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 49.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MCQEF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs GUOSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HTNGF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs NRSCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HUATF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CMSQY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CMSQY trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CMSQF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CNICF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HAITY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs DSECF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DSEEY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DSEEY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs WSOUF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BRPHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BRPHF trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IVTJF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs IGGHY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and IGGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs IVTJY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs IGGRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CLPE Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CGXYY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs LTSAP Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while LTSAP trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PLSQF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs TCAPF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs LTSA Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FNNTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MAUSY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DEFTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DEFTF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -44.11. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NHMAF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs MNXBF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CFNCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs LKADF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CBGPY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 672.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CBGPY trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CCORF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 663.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CCORF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and CCORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs PHIG Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 595.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PHIG trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PHIGW Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CBGPF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NAGGF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CYFRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 436.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CYFRF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CNSRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CESTY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ABGSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CESTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs APPCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs OSHDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ABIT Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 214.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CSCHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PROP Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 191.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PROP trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs NPPTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 177.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while NPPTF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs OZFRY Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs PNPFF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 149.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PNPFF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CAGPF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs STGC Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CURN Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CURN trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.46. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DGTLF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs XAUMF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 78.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while XAUMF trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs GEVI Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 77.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while GEVI trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DYNA Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HAFG Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while HAFG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and HAFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs UFFRF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs ARCNF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 44.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DMGGF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 34.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DMGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CMZZF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs BBKCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 28.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BBKCF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CBTTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 27.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CFLSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs CRMZ Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 25.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CRMZ trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs EBML Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ARBKF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 20.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while ARBKF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs SMURF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BULT Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 18.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BULT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FWAV Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs MATEF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 15.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while MATEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs FDCT Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 12.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while FDCT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs AVFCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and AVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs DPXCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs ABSOF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs IHLDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 10.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while IHLDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and IHLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs PHIL Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 9.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BCNWF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 8.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BCNWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and BCNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs ITEX Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while ITEX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and ITEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs FFTTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 6.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BTCWF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BLVDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs HIPH Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and HIPH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CCPUF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CSTXF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs AAMTF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and AAMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs HYHDF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 4.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while HYHDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BZRD Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs BIDCF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BIDCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and BIDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs CRKR Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs TRAA Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 3.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while TRAA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BKBLF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs GBCHF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs DBKSF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY and DBKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHY vs PIHG Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while PIHG trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.
CIIHY vs BKLIF Comparison
CIIHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHY stands at 53.67B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHY is priced at $26.70, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.84, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHY is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHY.