CITIC Securities Company Limited
CITIC Securities Company Limited CIIHF Peers
See (CIIHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIIHF | $3.03 | +0.00% | 56.6B | 14.43 | $0.21 | +4.60% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 114.1B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| MQBKY | $150.64 | -0.84% | 57.9B | 20.96 | $7.18 | +2.74% |
| MCQEF | $156.77 | +4.17% | 57.2B | 21.80 | $7.19 | +2.85% |
| CIIHY | $30.26 | +8.07% | 55.1B | 14.41 | $2.10 | +3.31% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | +0.00% | 38.4B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +2.08% |
| NRSCF | $6.41 | +0.00% | 18.9B | 8.32 | $0.77 | +6.06% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | +0.00% | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +0.89% |
| HUATF | $1.70 | +0.00% | 18.2B | 6.80 | $0.25 | +37.42% |
| CMSQF | $24.81 | -9.45% | 15.9B | 29.46 | $0.93 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
CIIHF vs IBKKF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and IBKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs MQBKY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while MQBKY trades at $150.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs MCQEF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while MCQEF trades at $156.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CIIHY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CIIHY trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CIIHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs GUOSF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and GUOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs NRSCF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while NRSCF trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and NRSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs HTNGF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs HUATF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while HUATF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CMSQF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CMSQF trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CMSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CMSQY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CMSQY trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CNICF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CNICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs HAITY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs DSECF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DSECF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and DSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs DSEEY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DSEEY trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and DSEEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs WSOUF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and WSOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs BRPHF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs IVTJF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs IGGHY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while IGGHY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and IGGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs IVTJY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs IGGRF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and IGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CLPE Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CGXYY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CGXYY trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 240.91. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CGXYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs FNNTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while FNNTF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and FNNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs TCAPF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while TCAPF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and TCAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs LTSAP Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while LTSAP trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs MAUSY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while MAUSY trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and MAUSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs PLSQF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs LTSA Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs NHMAF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and NHMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs DEFTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CFNCF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CFNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs MNXBF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while MNXBF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and MNXBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CCORF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 785.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CCORF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CCORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CBGPF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CBGPF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CBGPY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 770.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CBGPY trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs LKADF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CNSRF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 688.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CNSRF trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CNSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs PHIG Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while PHIG trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and PHIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs PHIGW Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs NAGGF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs ABGSF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 357M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while ABGSF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and ABGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CESTY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CESTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CYFRF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CYFRF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 176.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CESTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs APPCF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while APPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and APPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs OSHDF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and OSHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs ABIT Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CSCHF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CSCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs ARCNF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and ARCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs NPPTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while NPPTF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs GEVI Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while GEVI trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CAGPF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CAGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs OZFRY Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while OZFRY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and OZFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs PNPFF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while PNPFF trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs STGC Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CURN Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CURN trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs XAUMF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while XAUMF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs DGTLF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and DGTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs HAFG Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while HAFG trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and HAFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs UFFRF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CBTTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CBTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs DMGGF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DMGGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BULT Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BULT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BBKCF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BBKCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs CMZZF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs DBKSF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DBKSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and DBKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CFLSF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CFLSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CRMZ Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs EBML Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs SMURF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs FDCT Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while FDCT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs ARBKF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs HYHDF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while HYHDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BCNWF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BCNWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs FWAV Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs DYNA Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and DYNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs AVFCF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and AVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs MATEF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs IHLDF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and IHLDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs DPXCF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and DPXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs TRAA Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs ABSOF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while ABSOF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and ABSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs FFTTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and FFTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs ITEX Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while ITEX trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and ITEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs BTCWF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BTCWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BLVDF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and BLVDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs AAMTF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while AAMTF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and AAMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CSTXF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CSTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CCPUF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CCPUF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs PHIL Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BZRD Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs GRNBF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while GRNBF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and GRNBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs CRKR Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BLQC Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BLQC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BKBLF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and BKBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs BEGI Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.
CIIHF vs BKLIF Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and BKLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs FNDM Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and FNDM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CIIHF vs PIHG Comparison
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 56.6B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $3.03, while PIHG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.43, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF and PIHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).