CITIC Securities Company Limited
CITIC Securities Company Limited (CIIHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIIHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIIHF | $4.09 | +4.87% | 60.7B | 19.48 | $0.21 | +1.78% |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 113.5B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +0.53% |
| CIIHY | $40.00 | +0.00% | 63.3B | 19.05 | $2.10 | +1.81% |
| MQBKY | $146.79 | +2.33% | 56.2B | 20.34 | $7.18 | +2.82% |
| MCQEF | $141.94 | +0.67% | 52.3B | 19.94 | $7.19 | +3.12% |
| GUOSF | $2.00 | +0.00% | 48.9B | 6.25 | $0.32 | +3.10% |
| NRSCF | $7.73 | +8.13% | 21.1B | 8.61 | $0.83 | +5.43% |
| CNICF | $2.35 | +0.00% | 21B | 16.79 | $0.14 | +1.07% |
| HUATF | $2.10 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 8.40 | $0.25 | +3.46% |
Stock Comparison
CIIHF vs IBKKF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 113.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check IBKKF's competition here
CIIHF vs HAITY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check HAITY's competition here
CIIHF vs CIIHY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CIIHY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CIIHY's competition here
CIIHF vs MQBKY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while MQBKY trades at $146.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check MQBKY's competition here
CIIHF vs MCQEF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while MCQEF trades at $141.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check MCQEF's competition here
CIIHF vs GUOSF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while GUOSF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check GUOSF's competition here
CIIHF vs NRSCF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while NRSCF trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check NRSCF's competition here
CIIHF vs CNICF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CNICF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CNICF's competition here
CIIHF vs HUATF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while HUATF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check HUATF's competition here
CIIHF vs HTNGF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check HTNGF's competition here
CIIHF vs CGXYY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CGXYY trades at $41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 375.45. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CGXYY's competition here
CIIHF vs CMSQY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CMSQY trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CMSQY's competition here
CIIHF vs CMSQF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CMSQF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CMSQF's competition here
CIIHF vs DSEEY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DSEEY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DSEEY's competition here
CIIHF vs DSECF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DSECF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DSECF's competition here
CIIHF vs WSOUF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check WSOUF's competition here
CIIHF vs BRPHF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BRPHF trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BRPHF's competition here
CIIHF vs IVTJF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while IVTJF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check IVTJF's competition here
CIIHF vs IGGRF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while IGGRF trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check IGGRF's competition here
CIIHF vs IGGHY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while IGGHY trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check IGGHY's competition here
CIIHF vs IVTJY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check IVTJY's competition here
CIIHF vs CLPE Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CLPE's competition here
CIIHF vs FNNTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while FNNTF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check FNNTF's competition here
CIIHF vs TCAPF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while TCAPF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check TCAPF's competition here
CIIHF vs LTSAP Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while LTSAP trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check LTSAP's competition here
CIIHF vs MAUSY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while MAUSY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check MAUSY's competition here
CIIHF vs PLSQF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check PLSQF's competition here
CIIHF vs LTSA Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check LTSA's competition here
CIIHF vs NHMAF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while NHMAF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check NHMAF's competition here
CIIHF vs MNXBF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while MNXBF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check MNXBF's competition here
CIIHF vs DEFTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DEFTF's competition here
CIIHF vs CFNCF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CFNCF's competition here
CIIHF vs CBGPY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CBGPY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CBGPY's competition here
CIIHF vs CBGPF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 836.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CBGPF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CBGPF's competition here
CIIHF vs LKADF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check LKADF's competition here
CIIHF vs CCORF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 754.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CCORF trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CCORF's competition here
CIIHF vs PHIG Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while PHIG trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check PHIG's competition here
CIIHF vs PHIGW Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check PHIGW's competition here
CIIHF vs CNSRF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 692.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CNSRF trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CNSRF's competition here
CIIHF vs NAGGF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check NAGGF's competition here
CIIHF vs CSCHF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 377.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CSCHF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CSCHF's competition here
CIIHF vs ABGSF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 341.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while ABGSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check ABGSF's competition here
CIIHF vs CESTY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CESTY's competition here
CIIHF vs CESTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CESTF's competition here
CIIHF vs OSHDF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check OSHDF's competition here
CIIHF vs APPCF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while APPCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check APPCF's competition here
CIIHF vs CYFRF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CYFRF trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 121.33. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CYFRF's competition here
CIIHF vs OZFRY Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while OZFRY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check OZFRY's competition here
CIIHF vs CAGPF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CAGPF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is 68.33. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CAGPF's competition here
CIIHF vs STGC Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check STGC's competition here
CIIHF vs NPPTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while NPPTF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is -80.59. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check NPPTF's competition here
CIIHF vs PNPFF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while PNPFF trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check PNPFF's competition here
CIIHF vs CURN Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CURN trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CURN's competition here
CIIHF vs XAUMF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while XAUMF trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check XAUMF's competition here
CIIHF vs ABIT Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while ABIT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check ABIT's competition here
CIIHF vs ARCNF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while ARCNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check ARCNF's competition here
CIIHF vs GEVI Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while GEVI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -8.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check GEVI's competition here
CIIHF vs DGTLF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DGTLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DGTLF's competition here
CIIHF vs HAFG Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while HAFG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check HAFG's competition here
CIIHF vs UFFRF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check UFFRF's competition here
CIIHF vs FDCT Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while FDCT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check FDCT's competition here
CIIHF vs DMGGF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DMGGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DMGGF's competition here
CIIHF vs CBTTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CBTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CBTTF's competition here
CIIHF vs BULT Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BULT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BULT's competition here
CIIHF vs CMZZF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CMZZF's competition here
CIIHF vs DBKSF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DBKSF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DBKSF's competition here
CIIHF vs BBKCF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BBKCF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BBKCF's competition here
CIIHF vs CFLSF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CFLSF's competition here
CIIHF vs EBML Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check EBML's competition here
CIIHF vs CRMZ Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CRMZ trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CRMZ's competition here
CIIHF vs SMURF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check SMURF's competition here
CIIHF vs ARBKF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check ARBKF's competition here
CIIHF vs FWAV Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +7.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check FWAV's competition here
CIIHF vs HYHDF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while HYHDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check HYHDF's competition here
CIIHF vs DYNA Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DYNA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DYNA's competition here
CIIHF vs BCNWF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BCNWF's competition here
CIIHF vs AVFCF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while AVFCF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check AVFCF's competition here
CIIHF vs IHLDF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while IHLDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check IHLDF's competition here
CIIHF vs MATEF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check MATEF's competition here
CIIHF vs BZRD Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BZRD's competition here
CIIHF vs DPXCF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while DPXCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check DPXCF's competition here
CIIHF vs TRAA Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while TRAA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check TRAA's competition here
CIIHF vs FFTTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check FFTTF's competition here
CIIHF vs BLVDF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BLVDF's competition here
CIIHF vs HIPH Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check HIPH's competition here
CIIHF vs ABSOF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while ABSOF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check ABSOF's competition here
CIIHF vs ITEX Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while ITEX trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check ITEX's competition here
CIIHF vs CCPUF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CCPUF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CCPUF's competition here
CIIHF vs BTCWF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BTCWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BTCWF's competition here
CIIHF vs AAMTF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while AAMTF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check AAMTF's competition here
CIIHF vs PHIL Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check PHIL's competition here
CIIHF vs CSTXF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CSTXF's competition here
CIIHF vs CRKR Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CRKR's competition here
CIIHF vs BKBLF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check BKBLF's competition here
CIIHF vs GBCHF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +32506.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check GBCHF's competition here
CIIHF vs PIHG Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while PIHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check PIHG's competition here
CIIHF vs CBTC Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check CBTC's competition here
CIIHF vs GRNBF Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while GRNBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is more volatile compared to GRNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check GRNBF's competition here
CIIHF vs FNDM Comparison August 2025
CIIHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIIHF stands at 60.7B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIIHF is priced at $4.09, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIIHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.48, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIIHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIIHF is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIIHF.Check FNDM's competition here