China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. CIHKY Peers
See (CIHKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIHKY | $31.13 | +0.13% | 159.78B | 8.04 | $3.87 | +4.38% |
| UNCRY | $30.87 | -1.12% | 195.09B | 9.44 | $3.27 | +2.49% |
| CAIXY | $2.73 | +1.10% | 174.89B | 8.81 | $0.31 | +4.59% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.34B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -12.24% | 129.53B | 6.61 | $0.77 | +5.44% |
| DBSDF | $35.49 | +1.11% | 100.51B | 11.64 | $3.05 | +2.74% |
| BNPQY | $44.25 | +0.32% | 99.97B | 8.24 | $5.37 | +5.66% |
| BNPQF | $87.60 | +2.46% | 98.95B | 8.16 | $10.74 | +6.48% |
| DBSDY | $136.80 | +0.92% | 97.25B | 11.20 | $12.21 | +4.87% |
| UNCFF | $62.00 | -3.13% | 96.57B | 9.48 | $6.54 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
CIHKY vs UNCRY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 195.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while UNCRY trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CAIXY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 174.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CAIXY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKAYY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CIHHF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 129.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs DBSDF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 100.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while DBSDF trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BNPQY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 99.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BNPQY trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BNPQF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 98.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BNPQF trades at $87.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs DBSDY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 97.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while DBSDY trades at $136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs UNCFF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 96.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while UNCFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs IITSF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 96.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while IITSF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SBKFF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 78.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SBKFF trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs KBCSY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 74.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while KBCSY trades at $47.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PBCRY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 68.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PBCRY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs AKSJF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PBCRF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 64.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PBCRF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs MZHOF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 63.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while MZHOF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs EBKDY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while EBKDY trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs LLDTF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 60.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while LLDTF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs LLOBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 57.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while LLOBF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CRARY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 57.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CRARY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs OVCHY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while OVCHY trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CRARF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 56.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CRARF trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs OVCHF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while OVCHF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CIXPF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 56.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CIXPF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CHBJF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 56.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CHBJF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PSBKF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 55.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PSBKF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CHCJY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 49.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CHCJY trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs NRDBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 48.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while NRDBY trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs NBNKF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 48.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while NBNKF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs UOVEF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs STNDF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs UOVEY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while UOVEY trades at $54.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BHKLY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 44.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BHKLY trades at $83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BNKHF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BNKHF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SCGLY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 41.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SCGLY trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs DNBBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 38.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while DNBBF trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs DNBBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 37.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while DNBBY trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SCGLF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 36.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SCGLF trades at $51.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs KBCSF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 35.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while KBCSF trades at $90.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKRKY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 34.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKRKY trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CRZBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 34.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CRZBF trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CRZBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 34.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CRZBY trades at $29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CWESF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 34.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs JPSTF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs JPPTY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SVKEF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 32.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SVKEF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CEBCF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs EBKOF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while EBKOF trades at $81.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs DNKEY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 30.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while DNKEY trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs MLYBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 30.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while MLYBY trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BDORY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 30.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BDORY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs JPPHY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 29.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while JPPHY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs JPHLF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs MLYNF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SWDBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 28.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SWDBF trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SWDBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 28.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SWDBY trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKRKF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 28.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKRKF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CMAKY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 28.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CMAKY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs DNSKF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PSZKY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 28.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PSZKY trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PPERF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 27.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PPERF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs HSNGY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while HSNGY trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PSZKF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 27.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PSZKF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PPERY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 26.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PPERY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs FCNCB Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while FCNCB trades at $1,660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs GBOOY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while GBOOY trades at $43.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs GBOOF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while GBOOF trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs HSNGF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BLMIF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 22.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BLMIF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BPXXY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SBGOF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 21.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SBGOF trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKHYY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKHYY trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SGBLY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SGBLY trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CKHGY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 20.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CKHGY trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CGMBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 20.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CGMBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs MDIBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while MDIBY trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CKHGF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CRDIY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 18.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs RSNHF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 17.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while RSNHF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SUTNY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 17.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SUTNY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs PBLOF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CMTDF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 17.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CMTDF trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs AIBGY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while AIBGY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKHPF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs ISNPY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while ISNPY trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs GPFOF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BDOUF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs GPFOY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs AIBRF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while AIBRF trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs VLYPN Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while VLYPN trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SKCBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs SUGBY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BNCZF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs OTPBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs MDIBF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKRIY Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 12.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKRIY trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs CIMDF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while CIMDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BKRIF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 12.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BKRIF trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.
CIHKY vs BPHLF Comparison
CIHKY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIHKY stands at 159.78B. In comparison, BPHLF has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CIHKY is priced at $31.13, while BPHLF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIHKY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BPHLF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, CIHKY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BPHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIHKY is more volatile compared to BPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIHKY.