Loncar China BioPharma ETF

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VOO trades at $577.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VFINX trades at $582.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VITSX trades at $150.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTSAX trades at $150.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 641.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTI trades at $309.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 638.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FXAIX trades at $219.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 635.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while IVV trades at $631.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 577B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while SPY trades at $628.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 502.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VXUS trades at $69.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 490.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTSNX trades at $149.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 357.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VMCPX trades at $382.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 328.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VIMAX trades at $350.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 310.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VINIX trades at $512.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 310.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VIIIX trades at $512.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while GAFFX trades at $83.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RGAGX trades at $83.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AGTHX trades at $83.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 292.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while GFAFX trades at $82.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 262.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RGABX trades at $74.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 258.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RGAAX trades at $73.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 252.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while GFACX trades at $71.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 242.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while BALFX trades at $36.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 242.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AMBFX trades at $36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 242.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AFMBX trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while ABALX trades at $36.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RLBGX trades at $36.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 227.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VEA trades at $57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 223.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTMNX trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 222.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VDIPX trades at $28.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 221.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while QQQ trades at $564.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VB trades at $241.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while BX trades at $166.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 186.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTV trades at $177.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VO trades at $283.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 169.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while BLK trades at $1,093.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while C-PN trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AICCX trades at $63.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 159.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AIVSX trades at $64.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 158.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FCTDX trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RICBX trades at $63.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FCNTX trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 157.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FCNKX trades at $23.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AICFX trades at $63.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RICAX trades at $63.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 150.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while ANWPX trades at $70.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FNPFX trades at $70.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RNPGX trades at $70.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while NPFFX trades at $69.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AFIFX trades at $89.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while ANCFX trades at $89.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AWSHX trades at $64.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RWMFX trades at $64.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FWMIX trades at $64.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while CWMAX trades at $64.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while WSHFX trades at $64.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while CFNAX trades at $88.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while WSHCX trades at $63.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RWMBX trades at $63.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while IEFA trades at $83.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 133.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RERHX trades at $60.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RERGX trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AEPFX trades at $60.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AEGFX trades at $60.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AEPGX trades at $60.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while KKR trades at $144.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AGG trades at $98.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.47. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while IWF trades at $435.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VSCIX trades at $115.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while NAESX trades at $115.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VWELX trades at $45.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VWENX trades at $78.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while BN trades at $66.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 228.72. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VUG trades at $450.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 39.90. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VGT trades at $686.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while JLGMX trades at $90.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while SEEGX trades at $85.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VIG trades at $206.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while JLGRX trades at $89.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while FSKAX trades at $173.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTTHX trades at $26.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VDADX trades at $55.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VITAX trades at $351.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while TBCIX trades at $205.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while TRBCX trades at $204.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTHRX trades at $41.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while PABGX trades at $197.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VFORX trades at $47.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while BAM trades at $60.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while IJH trades at $63.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VTIVX trades at $32.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while DODGX trades at $270.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RRBGX trades at $183.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VIEIX trades at $149.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while RAFFX trades at $46.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while PRUFX trades at $114.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while VEMAX trades at $42.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while PRGFX trades at $113.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AMCPX trades at $44.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.

CHNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHNA stands at 0. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHNA is priced at $13.53, while AMPFX trades at $44.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHNA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, CHNA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHNA is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHNA.