CHL Limited
CHL Limited (CHLLTD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CHLLTD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHLLTD.BO | ₹31.95 | -0.19% | 1.7B | -7.25 | -₹4.35 | N/A |
| TBOTEK.NS | ₹1,173.30 | +1.09% | 125.7B | 52.34 | ₹22.55 | N/A |
| THOMASCOOK.BO | ₹103.46 | +1.08% | 49.8B | 19.72 | ₹5.42 | +0.42% |
| THOMASCOOK.NS | ₹103.61 | +1.46% | 49.8B | 20.39 | ₹5.24 | +0.42% |
| EASEMYTRIP.BO | ₹7.67 | -3.76% | 29.1B | -29.67 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| EASEMYTRIP.NS | ₹7.67 | -3.64% | 29.1B | -29.67 | -₹0.27 | N/A |
| YATRA.NS | ₹102.92 | +0.49% | 16.1B | 30.46 | ₹3.37 | N/A |
| YATRA.BO | ₹103.03 | +0.48% | 16.1B | 29.90 | ₹3.43 | N/A |
| BENARAS.BO | ₹10,003.75 | +5.25% | 12.5B | 28.57 | ₹337.59 | +0.26% |
| UPHOT.BO | ₹1,399.95 | +2.04% | 7.6B | 25.13 | ₹55.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CHLLTD.BO vs TBOTEK.NS Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TBOTEK.NS has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while TBOTEK.NS trades at ₹1,173.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TBOTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 52.34. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBOTEK.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to TBOTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check TBOTEK.NS's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs THOMASCOOK.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.BO has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while THOMASCOOK.BO trades at ₹103.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas THOMASCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THOMASCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check THOMASCOOK.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs THOMASCOOK.NS Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, THOMASCOOK.NS has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while THOMASCOOK.NS trades at ₹103.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas THOMASCOOK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THOMASCOOK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to THOMASCOOK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check THOMASCOOK.NS's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs EASEMYTRIP.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while EASEMYTRIP.BO trades at ₹7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas EASEMYTRIP.BO's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check EASEMYTRIP.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs EASEMYTRIP.NS Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EASEMYTRIP.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while EASEMYTRIP.NS trades at ₹7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas EASEMYTRIP.NS's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to EASEMYTRIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check EASEMYTRIP.NS's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs YATRA.NS Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YATRA.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while YATRA.NS trades at ₹102.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas YATRA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YATRA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to YATRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check YATRA.NS's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs YATRA.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YATRA.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while YATRA.BO trades at ₹103.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas YATRA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YATRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to YATRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check YATRA.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs BENARAS.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BENARAS.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while BENARAS.BO trades at ₹10,003.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas BENARAS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BENARAS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is less volatile compared to BENARAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check BENARAS.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs UPHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPHOT.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while UPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,399.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas UPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to UPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check UPHOT.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs SAYAJIHOTL.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAYAJIHOTL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while SAYAJIHOTL.BO trades at ₹280.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SAYAJIHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to SAYAJIHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check SAYAJIHOTL.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs SINCLAIR.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SINCLAIR.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while SINCLAIR.BO trades at ₹80.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SINCLAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINCLAIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to SINCLAIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check SINCLAIR.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs ESPIRE.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ESPIRE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while ESPIRE.BO trades at ₹260.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ESPIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESPIRE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to ESPIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check ESPIRE.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs EMERALL.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EMERALL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while EMERALL.BO trades at ₹205.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas EMERALL.BO's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMERALL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to EMERALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check EMERALL.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs GRAVISSHO.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRAVISSHO.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while GRAVISSHO.BO trades at ₹30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas GRAVISSHO.BO's P/E ratio is -313.20. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAVISSHO.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to GRAVISSHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check GRAVISSHO.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs SAVERA.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAVERA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while SAVERA.BO trades at ₹160.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SAVERA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAVERA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to SAVERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check SAVERA.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs PHOENIXTN.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PHOENIXTN.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while PHOENIXTN.BO trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PHOENIXTN.BO's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PHOENIXTN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is less volatile compared to PHOENIXTN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check PHOENIXTN.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs HBESD.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HBESD.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while HBESD.BO trades at ₹68.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas HBESD.BO's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBESD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to HBESD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check HBESD.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs GUJHOTE.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GUJHOTE.BO has a market cap of 699M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while GUJHOTE.BO trades at ₹184.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas GUJHOTE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GUJHOTE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to GUJHOTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check GUJHOTE.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs RAYALEMA.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RAYALEMA.BO has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while RAYALEMA.BO trades at ₹28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas RAYALEMA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYALEMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to RAYALEMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check RAYALEMA.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs JINDHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JINDHOT.BO has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while JINDHOT.BO trades at ₹62.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas JINDHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 62.38. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINDHOT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to JINDHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check JINDHOT.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs PGCRL.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PGCRL.BO has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while PGCRL.BO trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PGCRL.BO's P/E ratio is -141.11. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGCRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to PGCRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check PGCRL.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs PECOS.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PECOS.BO has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while PECOS.BO trades at ₹251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PECOS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to PECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check PECOS.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs COX&KINGS.NS Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COX&KINGS.NS has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while COX&KINGS.NS trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas COX&KINGS.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COX&KINGS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to COX&KINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check COX&KINGS.NS's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs ARUNAHTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARUNAHTEL.BO has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while ARUNAHTEL.BO trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ARUNAHTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to ARUNAHTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check ARUNAHTEL.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs RELIABVEN.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELIABVEN.BO has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while RELIABVEN.BO trades at ₹22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas RELIABVEN.BO's P/E ratio is 164.43. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELIABVEN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to RELIABVEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check RELIABVEN.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs HOWARHO.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HOWARHO.BO has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while HOWARHO.BO trades at ₹24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas HOWARHO.BO's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOWARHO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to HOWARHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check HOWARHO.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs VELHO.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VELHO.BO has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while VELHO.BO trades at ₹6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas VELHO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VELHO.BO's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to VELHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check VELHO.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs BESTEAST.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BESTEAST.BO has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while BESTEAST.BO trades at ₹12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas BESTEAST.BO's P/E ratio is -244.80. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BESTEAST.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is less volatile compared to BESTEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check BESTEAST.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs POLOHOT.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, POLOHOT.BO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while POLOHOT.BO trades at ₹9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas POLOHOT.BO's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POLOHOT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to POLOHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check POLOHOT.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs CINDHO.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CINDHO.BO has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while CINDHO.BO trades at ₹56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas CINDHO.BO's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CINDHO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to CINDHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check CINDHO.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs HOTLSILV.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HOTLSILV.BO has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while HOTLSILV.BO trades at ₹10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas HOTLSILV.BO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOTLSILV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is less volatile compared to HOTLSILV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check HOTLSILV.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs RASRESOR.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RASRESOR.BO has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while RASRESOR.BO trades at ₹39.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas RASRESOR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RASRESOR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to RASRESOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check RASRESOR.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs LORDSHOTL.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LORDSHOTL.BO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while LORDSHOTL.BO trades at ₹14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LORDSHOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LORDSHOTL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to LORDSHOTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check LORDSHOTL.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs SAILANI.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAILANI.BO has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while SAILANI.BO trades at ₹17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SAILANI.BO's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAILANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to SAILANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check SAILANI.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs WOODSVILA.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WOODSVILA.BO has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while WOODSVILA.BO trades at ₹13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas WOODSVILA.BO's P/E ratio is -23.66. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOODSVILA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is more volatile compared to WOODSVILA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check WOODSVILA.BO's competition here
CHLLTD.BO vs SILVERPRL.BO Comparison April 2026
CHLLTD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHLLTD.BO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SILVERPRL.BO has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHLLTD.BO is priced at ₹31.95, while SILVERPRL.BO trades at ₹7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHLLTD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SILVERPRL.BO's P/E ratio is -181.75. In terms of profitability, CHLLTD.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILVERPRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHLLTD.BO is less volatile compared to SILVERPRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHLLTD.BO.Check SILVERPRL.BO's competition here