Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust
Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust CHKR Peers
See (CHKR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHKR | $0.45 | +8.55% | 20.8M | 4.95 | $0.09 | +19.46% |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +2.77% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $16.70 | +6.00% | 31.7B | 8.93 | $1.87 | +7.33% |
| TRMLF | $48.83 | -0.27% | 18.9B | 19.77 | $2.47 | +5.38% |
| PEXNY | $9.05 | +10.77% | 18B | 7.61 | $1.19 | +5.85% |
| IPXHY | $14.71 | +1.73% | 17.6B | 6.00 | $2.45 | +2.87% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| STOSF | $5.13 | +3.39% | 16.6B | 13.49 | $0.38 | +4.58% |
| IPXHF | $13.80 | +0.95% | 16.5B | 5.66 | $2.44 | +3.68% |
Stock Comparison
CHKR vs MEYYY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs NSTKF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs WOPEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while WOPEF trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs TRMLF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while TRMLF trades at $48.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PEXNY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PEXNY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs IPXHY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while IPXHY trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs DETNF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs STOSF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while STOSF trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs IPXHF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while IPXHF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs SSLZY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while SSLZY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs AETUF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while AETUF trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs NOVKY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs SPGYF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while SPGYF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PTRRY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PTRRY trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs WLLBW Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, WLLBW has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while WLLBW trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas WLLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WLLBW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to WLLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs VSOGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs MEGEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while MEGEF trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs DKDRF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while DKDRF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PREKF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PREKF trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs HBRIY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while HBRIY trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -28.20. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PMOIF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PMOIF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs DELKY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while DELKY trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs DLKGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while DLKGF trades at $186.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PEYUF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PEYUF trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs OASPW Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PRMRF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PRMRF trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs EERGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs NUVSF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while NUVSF trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs BTEGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ATHOF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ATHOF trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs UNEGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while UNEGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs BEPTF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while BEPTF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs BCHEY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while BCHEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs JPTXF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while JPTXF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs IPCFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while IPCFF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs FRHLF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while FRHLF trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs AAVVF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while AAVVF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -70.42. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs BIREF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while BIREF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PTGIF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CDDRF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CDDRF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs EFVIF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CRCQW Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs WLLAW Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs KELTF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while KELTF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs DTNOF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while DTNOF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PARXF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PARXF trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PQEFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PQEFF has a market cap of 985.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PQEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PQEFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PQEFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PQEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs KRNGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 984.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while KRNGF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs AOIFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while AOIFF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs SOGFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SOGFF has a market cap of 879.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while SOGFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas SOGFF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SOGFF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to SOGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CWEGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs SQZZF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 845M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while SQZZF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CRLFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CRLFF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs KWTEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 618.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while KWTEF trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs BWEFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while BWEFF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs DALXF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while DALXF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs AAGEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs GFKSY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ZPTAF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 472.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ZPTAF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PTALF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PTALF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs GUKYF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 455.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while GUKYF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs COPJF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while COPJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs RCKHF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while RCKHF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PTHRF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 416.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PTHRF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -36.40. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs TBNRF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs KRNGY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 397.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while KRNGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ATUUF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 396.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ATUUF trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs SHASF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 390.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while SHASF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs FECCF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 389.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while FECCF trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs TUWLF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while TUWLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs BKBEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs RZREF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, RZREF has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while RZREF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas RZREF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RZREF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to RZREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PRYGF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CEIEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 335.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CEIEF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -31.59. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ENQUF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs OILSF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 309.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while OILSF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs TUWOY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while TUWOY trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PEGIY Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PEGIY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PESAF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 275.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs EXCE Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while EXCE trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs GEGYF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CRNZF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CRNZF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs HZNFF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs MEOAF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, MEOAF has a market cap of 211.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while MEOAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas MEOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MEOAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to MEOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs IPOOF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while IPOOF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs SEUSF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while SEUSF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ITEEF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs CVONF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while CVONF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ZNOG Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ZNOG trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PSHIF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs HRCXF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs ALVOF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while ALVOF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs LNDNF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while LNDNF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PIFYF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PIFYF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs EEGUF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while EEGUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs RECWF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs GASXF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while GASXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs PNWRF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.
CHKR vs KGEIF Comparison
CHKR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHKR stands at 20.8M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, CHKR is priced at $0.45, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHKR currently has a P/E ratio of 4.95, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, CHKR's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHKR is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHKR.