Coro Global Inc.
Coro Global Inc. (CGLO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGLO | $0.00 | +480.00% | 29.5K | N/A | -$1.04 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $11.00 | -1.08% | 34.7B | 28.95 | $0.38 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,088.00 | +1.68% | 34.3B | 28.91 | $37.63 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $56.28 | +6.19% | 30.8B | 11.32 | $4.97 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | N/A |
| TOITF | $63.30 | -2.78% | 5.3B | 171.62 | $0.37 | N/A |
| NEXPF | $4.22 | -28.72% | 4.9B | 15.63 | $0.27 | +6.94% |
| TMICF | $36.19 | +1.15% | 4.8B | 23.97 | $1.51 | +2.83% |
| GMYTF | $62.75 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 33.74 | $1.86 | +1.54% |
| DRKTY | $7.05 | N/A | 4.5B | 41.47 | $0.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CGLO vs ADYEY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check ADYEY's competition here
CGLO vs ADYYF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,088.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check ADYYF's competition here
CGLO vs BSQKZ Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and BSQKZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSQKZ's competition here
CGLO vs KAKZF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and KAKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAKZF's competition here
CGLO vs TOITF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 171.62. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check TOITF's competition here
CGLO vs NEXPF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and NEXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEXPF's competition here
CGLO vs TMICF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and TMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMICF's competition here
CGLO vs GMYTF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and GMYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMYTF's competition here
CGLO vs DRKTY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DRKTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTY's competition here
CGLO vs NEXXY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check NEXXY's competition here
CGLO vs TMICY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check TMICY's competition here
CGLO vs SWDAF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check SWDAF's competition here
CGLO vs STWRY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and STWRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STWRY's competition here
CGLO vs CIOXY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check CIOXY's competition here
CGLO vs EXNWF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and EXNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXNWF's competition here
CGLO vs DRKTF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DRKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTF's competition here
CGLO vs OVHFF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and OVHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVHFF's competition here
CGLO vs SPNUF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 268.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SPNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPNUF's competition here
CGLO vs SPMYY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 210.60. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check SPMYY's competition here
CGLO vs MGPPF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is -91.67. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check MGPPF's competition here
CGLO vs SANP Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check SANP's competition here
CGLO vs FFPP Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and FFPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FFPP's competition here
CGLO vs PHPYF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and PHPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHPYF's competition here
CGLO vs FNCHF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 731.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -216.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and FNCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCHF's competition here
CGLO vs CPLFF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and CPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPLFF's competition here
CGLO vs WWLNF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 516.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and WWLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWLNF's competition here
CGLO vs WRDLY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 452.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and WRDLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRDLY's competition here
CGLO vs PYPTF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 451.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and PYPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYPTF's competition here
CGLO vs FMZNF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 428.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and FMZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMZNF's competition here
CGLO vs YHEKF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and YHEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YHEKF's competition here
CGLO vs PRTHU Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 395.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and PRTHU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRTHU's competition here
CGLO vs TDCSF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and TDCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDCSF's competition here
CGLO vs NFONF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and NFONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFONF's competition here
CGLO vs CORZQ Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check CORZQ's competition here
CGLO vs TYPMF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and TYPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYPMF's competition here
CGLO vs FSOYF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and FSOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSOYF's competition here
CGLO vs SEEMF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SEEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEEMF's competition here
CGLO vs ABANF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and ABANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABANF's competition here
CGLO vs OTPMF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and OTPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPMF's competition here
CGLO vs SERKF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SERKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SERKF's competition here
CGLO vs ERDLF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and ERDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERDLF's competition here
CGLO vs HAIVF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -181.07. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check HAIVF's competition here
CGLO vs DYNDF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check DYNDF's competition here
CGLO vs GIVXF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and GIVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVXF's competition here
CGLO vs CGAAY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and CGAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGAAY's competition here
CGLO vs PYFRF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and PYFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYFRF's competition here
CGLO vs WHEN Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 106.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to WHEN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and WHEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHEN's competition here
CGLO vs FCLOF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and FCLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCLOF's competition here
CGLO vs BGOPF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -40.67. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and BGOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGOPF's competition here
CGLO vs EXLGF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, EXLGF has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while EXLGF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to EXLGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and EXLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXLGF's competition here
CGLO vs HISNF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and HISNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HISNF's competition here
CGLO vs JGHG Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and JGHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHG's competition here
CGLO vs QBITF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and QBITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBITF's competition here
CGLO vs APGT Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check APGT's competition here
CGLO vs ISDCF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check ISDCF's competition here
CGLO vs CLOQ Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and CLOQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLOQ's competition here
CGLO vs DGGXF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DGGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGGXF's competition here
CGLO vs POTTF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and POTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POTTF's competition here
CGLO vs TMNA Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TMNA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TMNA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMNA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TMNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and TMNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMNA's competition here
CGLO vs NOWVF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check NOWVF's competition here
CGLO vs SKKY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SKKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKKY's competition here
CGLO vs CLPMF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and CLPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPMF's competition here
CGLO vs CYBNY Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and CYBNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBNY's competition here
CGLO vs CORZR Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and CORZR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CORZR's competition here
CGLO vs QFEEF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and QFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QFEEF's competition here
CGLO vs PLCKF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check PLCKF's competition here
CGLO vs SDCH Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check SDCH's competition here
CGLO vs EPXGF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and EPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPXGF's competition here
CGLO vs FOBIF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check FOBIF's competition here
CGLO vs KSIH Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, KSIH has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while KSIH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to KSIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and KSIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSIH's competition here
CGLO vs NBVAF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and NBVAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBVAF's competition here
CGLO vs VRSSF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check VRSSF's competition here
CGLO vs DLTXF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DLTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLTXF's competition here
CGLO vs TGCB Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check TGCB's competition here
CGLO vs DSAIF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DSAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSAIF's competition here
CGLO vs ZVLO Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ZVLO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ZVLO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZVLO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ZVLO's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and ZVLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZVLO's competition here
CGLO vs SFIIF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SFIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFIIF's competition here
CGLO vs VENZF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to VENZF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and VENZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VENZF's competition here
CGLO vs MKTDF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while MKTDF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and MKTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKTDF's competition here
CGLO vs FUAPF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and FUAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUAPF's competition here
CGLO vs PKKFF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and PKKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKKFF's competition here
CGLO vs DVPNF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DVPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVPNF's competition here
CGLO vs IPNFF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and IPNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPNFF's competition here
CGLO vs MODGF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and MODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MODGF's competition here
CGLO vs KCRD Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and KCRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCRD's competition here
CGLO vs OVTZ Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check OVTZ's competition here
CGLO vs DRKOF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and DRKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKOF's competition here
CGLO vs SMKG Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SMKG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SMKG's ROE of +16.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SMKG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMKG's competition here
CGLO vs SCYRF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SCYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCYRF's competition here
CGLO vs RIHT Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check RIHT's competition here
CGLO vs ITNF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while ITNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and ITNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITNF's competition here
CGLO vs VISM Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check VISM's competition here
CGLO vs RCWDF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and RCWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCWDF's competition here
CGLO vs INOTF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check INOTF's competition here
CGLO vs GMTH Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, GMTH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while GMTH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMTH's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to GMTH's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and GMTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMTH's competition here
CGLO vs TONR Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TONR's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check TONR's competition here
CGLO vs RKNEF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGLO.Check RKNEF's competition here
CGLO vs SLXXF Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -12.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and SLXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLXXF's competition here
CGLO vs TFLM Comparison February 2026
CGLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGLO stands at 29.5K. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGLO is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGLO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CGLO's ROE is -24.24%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +18.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CGLO and TFLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFLM's competition here