Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. (CFW.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CFW.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFW.TO | CA$3.41 | -0.29% | 292.9M | 28.42 | CA$0.12 | N/A |
| TVK.TO | CA$143.30 | -0.71% | 3.1B | 36.74 | CA$3.90 | +0.47% |
| CEU.TO | CA$8.20 | -2.03% | 1.8B | 10.25 | CA$0.80 | +1.74% |
| EFX.TO | CA$13.56 | -0.59% | 1.7B | 9.42 | CA$1.44 | +1.10% |
| SCL.TO | CA$16.57 | +1.04% | 1.2B | 552.33 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| TCW.TO | CA$5.80 | -1.19% | 1B | 10.74 | CA$0.54 | +3.23% |
| PSI.TO | CA$11.67 | -2.91% | 911.2M | 12.55 | CA$0.93 | +4.33% |
| MATR.TO | CA$11.06 | -0.72% | 680.2M | 22.57 | CA$0.49 | N/A |
| NOA.TO | CA$18.12 | -3.41% | 533.3M | 15.23 | CA$1.19 | +2.44% |
| TOT.TO | CA$13.45 | +0.00% | 500.2M | 7.91 | CA$1.70 | +2.85% |
Stock Comparison
CFW.TO vs TVK.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, TVK.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while TVK.TO trades at CA$143.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas TVK.TO's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TVK.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to TVK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check TVK.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs CEU.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, CEU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while CEU.TO trades at CA$8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas CEU.TO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CEU.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to CEU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check CEU.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs EFX.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, EFX.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while EFX.TO trades at CA$13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas EFX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EFX.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to EFX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check EFX.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs SCL.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, SCL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while SCL.TO trades at CA$16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas SCL.TO's P/E ratio is 552.33. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to SCL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check SCL.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs TCW.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, TCW.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while TCW.TO trades at CA$5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas TCW.TO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCW.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to TCW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check TCW.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs PSI.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, PSI.TO has a market cap of 911.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while PSI.TO trades at CA$11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas PSI.TO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to PSI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check PSI.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs MATR.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, MATR.TO has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while MATR.TO trades at CA$11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas MATR.TO's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MATR.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to MATR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check MATR.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs NOA.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, NOA.TO has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while NOA.TO trades at CA$18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas NOA.TO's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOA.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to NOA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check NOA.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs TOT.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, TOT.TO has a market cap of 500.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while TOT.TO trades at CA$13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas TOT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOT.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to TOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check TOT.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs STEP.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, STEP.TO has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while STEP.TO trades at CA$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas STEP.TO's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STEP.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to STEP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check STEP.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs SHLE.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, SHLE.TO has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while SHLE.TO trades at CA$14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas SHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHLE.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to SHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check SHLE.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs PSD.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, PSD.TO has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while PSD.TO trades at CA$3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas PSD.TO's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSD.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to PSD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check PSD.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs E.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, E.TO has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while E.TO trades at CA$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas E.TO's P/E ratio is 72.50. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to E.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to E.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check E.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs MCB.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, MCB.TO has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while MCB.TO trades at CA$3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas MCB.TO's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCB.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to MCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check MCB.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs SFD.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, SFD.TO has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while SFD.TO trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas SFD.TO's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SFD.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to SFD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check SFD.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs ESN.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, ESN.TO has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while ESN.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas ESN.TO's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is more volatile compared to ESN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check ESN.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs HWO.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, HWO.TO has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while HWO.TO trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas HWO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWO.TO's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is more volatile compared to HWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check HWO.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs BRY.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, BRY.TO has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while BRY.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas BRY.TO's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRY.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to BRY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check BRY.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs CSM.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, CSM.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while CSM.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas CSM.TO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSM.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is less volatile compared to CSM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check CSM.TO's competition here
CFW.TO vs HE.TO Comparison August 2025
CFW.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFW.TO stands at 292.9M. In comparison, HE.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CFW.TO is priced at CA$3.41, while HE.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFW.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.42, whereas HE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, CFW.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HE.TO's ROE of -102.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CFW.TO is more volatile compared to HE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFW.TO.Check HE.TO's competition here