Conformis, Inc.
Conformis, Inc. CFMS Peers
See (CFMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFMS | $2.27 | +0.44% | 17.9M | -0.40 | -$5.70 | N/A |
| ABT | $124.42 | +0.61% | 216.4B | 15.63 | $7.96 | +2.31% |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| BSX | $103.78 | +0.14% | 153.6B | 75.77 | $1.37 | N/A |
| SYK | $387.32 | -0.53% | 148B | 52.35 | $7.40 | +0.85% |
| MDT | $89.70 | +0.10% | 115B | 24.85 | $3.61 | +3.12% |
| EW | $76.56 | +0.09% | 44.9B | 31.64 | $2.42 | N/A |
| DXCM | $84.03 | +0.17% | 32.9B | 63.18 | $1.33 | N/A |
| PHG | $24.54 | -0.24% | 22.7B | 79.13 | $0.31 | +3.61% |
| STE | $222.65 | -1.30% | 21.9B | 36.14 | $6.16 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
CFMS vs ABT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ABT trades at $124.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BSX-PA Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BSX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BSX trades at $103.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 75.77. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SYK Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SYK trades at $387.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 52.35. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs MDT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while MDT trades at $89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs EW Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while EW trades at $76.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to EW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs DXCM Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while DXCM trades at $84.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 63.18. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PHG Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PHG trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 79.13. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs STE Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while STE trades at $222.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PODD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PODD trades at $280.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 51.18. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ZBH Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ZBH trades at $92.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ABMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ALGN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ALGN trades at $189.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SNN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SNN trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SWAV Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SWAV trades at $334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PEN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PEN trades at $228.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 211.91. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs GMED Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while GMED trades at $51.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BIO-B Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BIO-B trades at $257.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BIO Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BIO trades at $244.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BIO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs GKOS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while GKOS trades at $96.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -42.70. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BRKR Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BRKR trades at $35.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is 68.53. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BRKR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs NARI Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs IRTC Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while IRTC trades at $135.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -43.16. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ITGR Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ITGR trades at $111.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs INSP Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while INSP trades at $125.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs AXNX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs TMDX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while TMDX trades at $103.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 72.96. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PRCT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PRCT trades at $57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -33.76. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs LIVN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while LIVN trades at $42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LIVN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs NUVA Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs UFPT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while UFPT trades at $226.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SSII Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SSII trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SSII's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ATEC Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ATEC trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CNMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CNMD trades at $47.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs HSKA Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs AORT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while AORT trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is -60.06. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AORT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs AHCO Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while AHCO trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AHCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ESTA Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ESTA trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SILK Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs FNA Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs TNDM Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 974.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while TNDM trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs INMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 971M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while INMD trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs IART Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 883.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while IART trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -29.92. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CSII Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CRY Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CRY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CRY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs IRMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 714.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while IRMD trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 36.25. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SIBN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 710.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SIBN trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -26.46. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs APEN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CBLL Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CBLL trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs KIDS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 541.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while KIDS trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs AXGN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 528.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while AXGN trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -72.56. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs AVNS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while AVNS trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ZIMV Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 523.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ZIMV trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BFLY Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 466.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BFLY trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SRDX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SRDX trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -22.26. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SMLR Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SMLR trades at $39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SMLR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SENS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SENS trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SENS's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PACB Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 435.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PACB trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PACB's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs OFIX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 418.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while OFIX trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BVS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 418.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BVS trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BVS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CTKB Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CTKB trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -34.44. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BFLY-WT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BFLY-WT has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BFLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BFLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BFLY-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BFLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs TMCI Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 359.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while TMCI trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs NNOX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 329.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while NNOX trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SNWV Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SNWV trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SNWV's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PTHL Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PTHL has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PTHL trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PTHL's P/E ratio is -452.20. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PTHL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CATX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CATX trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CLPT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 310.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CLPT trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs OM Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, OM has a market cap of 310.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while OM trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OM's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to OM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to OM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs XAIR Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, XAIR has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while XAIR trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas XAIR's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to XAIR's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to XAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs VREX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while VREX trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs NPCE Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while NPCE trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs RXST Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 298.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while RXST trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CERS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 263.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CERS trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs VMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while VMD trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs MASS Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 249.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while MASS trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BWAY Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BWAY trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs TCMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while TCMD trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs NVRO Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs MXCT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, MXCT has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while MXCT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MXCT's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MXCT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to MXCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs CVRX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while CVRX trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs EYES Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while EYES trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EYES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs MGRM Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while MGRM trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs QTRX Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 201.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while QTRX trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs SGHT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while SGHT trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs TLSI Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while TLSI trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs INGN Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while INGN trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs PROF Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while PROF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs LNSR Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, LNSR has a market cap of 158.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while LNSR trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LNSR's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LNSR's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to LNSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BSGM Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BSGM trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BSGM's ROE of -35.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ANIK Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ANIK trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs ELMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while ELMD trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs RPID Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, RPID has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while RPID trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RPID's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to RPID's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to RPID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs RCEL Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, RCEL has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while RCEL trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RCEL's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to RCEL's ROE of -3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to RCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs OWLT Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, OWLT has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while OWLT trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OWLT's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to OWLT's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to OWLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs LUNG Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, LUNG has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while LUNG trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LUNG's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LUNG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to LUNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs LUCD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while LUCD trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LUCD's ROE of +26.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs AVR Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while AVR trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AVR's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.
CFMS vs BDMD Comparison
CFMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFMS stands at 17.9M. In comparison, BDMD has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CFMS is priced at $2.27, while BDMD trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BDMD's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, CFMS's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BDMD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CFMS is less volatile compared to BDMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFMS.