Canaccord Genuity Group Inc.
Canaccord Genuity Group Inc. CF-PC.TO Peers
See (CF-PC.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CF-PC.TO vs GS.NE Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 242.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while GS.NE trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs GLXY.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while GLXY.TO trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs HUT.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while HUT.TO trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs DEFI.NE Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while DEFI.NE trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is -42.69. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs CF.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 911.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while CF.TO trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -24.69. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs BITF.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 714.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while BITF.TO trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs HODL.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 565.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while HODL.CN trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 92.25. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs PNP.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 198.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while PNP.TO trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs RICH.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while RICH.CN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs CXI.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 125.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while CXI.TO trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs XAU.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 110.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while XAU.TO trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs BIGG.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while BIGG.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs FRNT.V Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while FRNT.V trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs SPIR.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 12.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while SPIR.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs HOLD.NE Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 11.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while HOLD.NE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs BTC.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while BTC.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs ARM.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while ARM.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs CODE.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while CODE.CN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs GBC.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while GBC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs SIX.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, SIX.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while SIX.CN trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CF-PC.TO has daily volatility of 1.59 and SIX.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CF-PC.TO vs FXC.TO Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, FXC.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while FXC.TO trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CF-PC.TO is more volatile compared to FXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF-PC.TO.
CF-PC.TO vs DIGI.CN Comparison
CF-PC.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF-PC.TO stands at 896.09M. In comparison, DIGI.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CF-PC.TO is priced at $22.80, while DIGI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF-PC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas DIGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CF-PC.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIGI.CN's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CF-PC.TO has daily volatility of 1.59 and DIGI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS.NE | $27.92 | +0.11% | 242.11B | 12.93 | $2.16 | +2.91% |
| GLXY.TO | $26.69 | -3.54% | 9.24B | 35.12 | $0.76 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | $19.35 | -1.88% | 2.02B | 4.12 | $4.70 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | $5.55 | +20.65% | 1.82B | -42.69 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| CF.TO | $8.89 | +0.91% | 911.48M | -24.69 | -$0.36 | +3.83% |
| CF-PC.TO | $22.80 | +0.57% | 896.09M | 10.56 | $2.16 | +3.83% |
| BITF.TO | $1.49 | +0.34% | 714.73M | -8.28 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | $3.69 | +11.82% | 565.14M | 92.25 | $0.04 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | $21.16 | +11.96% | 198.63M | 6.22 | $3.40 | N/A |
| RICH.CN | $2.85 | N/A | 142.73M | -28.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |