CI First Asset Core U.S. Equity ETF (CAD Hedged) Common Units
CI First Asset Core U.S. Equity ETF (CAD Hedged) Common Units (CES.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CES.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CES.TO | CA$24.50 | +0.00% | 4.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BNC.TO | CA$30.00 | +0.54% | 9.1B | 14.03 | CA$2.14 | +8.49% |
| EIT-UN.TO | CA$15.28 | +0.39% | 2.8B | 6.64 | CA$2.30 | +8.10% |
| NUBF.TO | CA$21.52 | +0.21% | 2.7B | 14.83 | CA$1.45 | +4.17% |
| NREA.TO | CA$25.10 | +0.20% | 1.4B | 21.23 | CA$1.18 | +1.83% |
| PFIA.TO | CA$10.17 | +0.00% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.02% |
| AD-UN.TO | CA$19.05 | +2.75% | 866.3M | 6.59 | CA$2.89 | +7.18% |
| MKB.TO | CA$19.11 | +0.37% | 853.4M | N/A | N/A | +3.39% |
| FIE.TO | CA$9.00 | +0.56% | 853.2M | 13.55 | CA$0.66 | +5.33% |
| HDIF.TO | CA$8.73 | +1.51% | 444.3M | 20.59 | CA$0.42 | +10.17% |
Stock Comparison
CES.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while BNC.TO trades at CA$30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check BNC.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check EIT-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while NUBF.TO trades at CA$21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check NUBF.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while NREA.TO trades at CA$25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check NREA.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PFIA.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PFIA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PFIA.TO trades at CA$10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFIA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PFIA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PFIA.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 866.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while AD-UN.TO trades at CA$19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check AD-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 853.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while MKB.TO trades at CA$19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check MKB.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 853.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while FIE.TO trades at CA$9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check FIE.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 444.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HDIF.TO trades at CA$8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HDIF.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while XTR.TO trades at CA$11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check XTR.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while CIC.TO trades at CA$13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check CIC.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while VCIP.TO trades at CA$26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check VCIP.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while IFRF.TO trades at CA$7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to IFRF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check IFRF.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while CCOR.TO trades at CA$17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to CCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check CCOR.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while ZMI.TO trades at CA$18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check ZMI.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PBY-UN.TO trades at CA$15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PBY-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HUBL.TO trades at CA$13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HUBL.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PIC-A.TO trades at CA$7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PIC-A.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while MGB.TO trades at CA$16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check MGB.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while BMAX.TO trades at CA$14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check BMAX.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PLDI.TO trades at CA$18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PLDI.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while FAP.TO trades at CA$2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check FAP.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while BGI-UN.TO trades at CA$6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check BGI-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HTAE.TO trades at CA$16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HTAE.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while TLF.TO trades at CA$25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check TLF.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while XINC.TO trades at CA$20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check XINC.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while FFI-UN.TO trades at CA$12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check FFI-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while MID-UN.TO trades at CA$7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check MID-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while RBN-UN.TO trades at CA$8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check RBN-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HGR.TO trades at CA$5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HGR.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while XSC.TO trades at CA$17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to XSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check XSC.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HHLE.TO trades at CA$8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HHLE.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while XSI.TO trades at CA$16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to XSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check XSI.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while EARN.TO trades at CA$49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to EARN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check EARN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while SKG-UN.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check SKG-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while FCGI.TO trades at CA$14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to FCGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check FCGI.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while INC-UN.TO trades at CA$8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check INC-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while RIFI.TO trades at CA$17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check RIFI.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PIN.TO trades at CA$18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PIN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PHR.TO trades at CA$19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PHR.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while ZWQT.TO trades at CA$17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check ZWQT.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while ETP.TO trades at CA$18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check ETP.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while FGX.NE trades at CA$4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to FGX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check FGX.NE's competition here
CES.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while FCMI.TO trades at CA$13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to FCMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check FCMI.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while BSO-UN.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check BSO-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to CIQ-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check CIQ-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while TPAY.TO trades at CA$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check TPAY.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while ENI-UN.TO trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check ENI-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HID.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HID.TO trades at CA$21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HID.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HBFE.TO trades at CA$10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HBFE.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while REIT.TO trades at CA$22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to REIT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check REIT.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs HBL-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HBL-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while HBL-UN.TO trades at CA$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBL-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBL-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to HBL-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check HBL-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs BUA-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BUA-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while BUA-UN.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUA-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUA-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to BUA-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check BUA-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs GDG-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GDG-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while GDG-UN.TO trades at CA$13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to GDG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check GDG-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs IGLB.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, IGLB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while IGLB.TO trades at CA$10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to IGLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check IGLB.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PMB-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PMB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PMB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PMB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PMB-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs BLB-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BLB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while BLB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is less volatile compared to BLB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check BLB-UN.TO's competition here
CES.TO vs PGI-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
CES.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CES.TO stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CES.TO is priced at CA$24.50, while PGI-UN.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CES.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CES.TO is more volatile compared to PGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CES.TO.Check PGI-UN.TO's competition here