Century Extrusions Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CENTEXT.NS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CENTEXT.NS
Century Extrusions Limited (CENTEXT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CENTEXT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aluminum Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTEXT.NS | ₹18.22 | -0.22% | 1.5B | 13.70 | ₹1.33 | N/A |
| HINDALCO.BO | ₹917.20 | +1.39% | 2.1T | 11.49 | ₹79.82 | +0.55% |
| HINDALCO.NS | ₹916.25 | +1.29% | 2T | 12.68 | ₹72.28 | +0.55% |
| NATIONALUM.NS | ₹401.80 | +0.59% | 738B | 12.02 | ₹33.44 | +2.86% |
| NATIONALUM.BO | ₹401.75 | +0.51% | 737.9B | 12.01 | ₹33.45 | +2.86% |
| ARFIN.BO | ₹76.23 | +0.24% | 12.9B | 141.17 | ₹0.54 | +0.14% |
| ARFIN.NS | ₹76.15 | +0.28% | 12.8B | 141.02 | ₹0.54 | +0.14% |
| MAANALU.NS | ₹126.96 | +0.75% | 6.9B | 44.86 | ₹2.83 | N/A |
| MAANALU.BO | ₹126.75 | +1.28% | 6.9B | 44.79 | ₹2.83 | N/A |
| MMP.NS | ₹216.06 | +6.31% | 5.5B | 23.01 | ₹9.39 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
CENTEXT.NS vs HINDALCO.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HINDALCO.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while HINDALCO.BO trades at ₹917.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas HINDALCO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINDALCO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to HINDALCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check HINDALCO.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs HINDALCO.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HINDALCO.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while HINDALCO.NS trades at ₹916.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas HINDALCO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINDALCO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to HINDALCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check HINDALCO.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs NATIONALUM.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NATIONALUM.NS has a market cap of 738B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while NATIONALUM.NS trades at ₹401.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas NATIONALUM.NS's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NATIONALUM.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to NATIONALUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check NATIONALUM.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs NATIONALUM.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NATIONALUM.BO has a market cap of 737.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while NATIONALUM.BO trades at ₹401.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas NATIONALUM.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NATIONALUM.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to NATIONALUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check NATIONALUM.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs ARFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARFIN.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while ARFIN.BO trades at ₹76.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas ARFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 141.17. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to ARFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check ARFIN.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs ARFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARFIN.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while ARFIN.NS trades at ₹76.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas ARFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 141.02. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARFIN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to ARFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check ARFIN.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MAANALU.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAANALU.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MAANALU.NS trades at ₹126.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MAANALU.NS's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAANALU.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to MAANALU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MAANALU.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MAANALU.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAANALU.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MAANALU.BO trades at ₹126.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MAANALU.BO's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAANALU.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to MAANALU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MAANALU.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MMP.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MMP.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MMP.NS trades at ₹216.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MMP.NS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MMP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is less volatile compared to MMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MMP.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs ALUFLUOR.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALUFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while ALUFLUOR.BO trades at ₹424.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas ALUFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALUFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to ALUFLUOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check ALUFLUOR.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs GSMFOILS.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSMFOILS.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while GSMFOILS.NS trades at ₹181.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas GSMFOILS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSMFOILS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to GSMFOILS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check GSMFOILS.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MNKALCOLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MNKALCOLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MNKALCOLTD.BO trades at ₹27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MNKALCOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -52.02. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MNKALCOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to MNKALCOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MNKALCOLTD.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MANAKALUCO.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MANAKALUCO.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MANAKALUCO.BO trades at ₹23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MANAKALUCO.BO's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANAKALUCO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKALUCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MANAKALUCO.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MANAKALUCO.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MANAKALUCO.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MANAKALUCO.NS trades at ₹23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MANAKALUCO.NS's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANAKALUCO.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKALUCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MANAKALUCO.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs CENTEXT.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CENTEXT.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while CENTEXT.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas CENTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CENTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to CENTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check CENTEXT.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs GOYALALUM.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOYALALUM.BO has a market cap of 860.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while GOYALALUM.BO trades at ₹6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas GOYALALUM.BO's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOYALALUM.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to GOYALALUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check GOYALALUM.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs GOYALALUM.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOYALALUM.NS has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while GOYALALUM.NS trades at ₹5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas GOYALALUM.NS's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOYALALUM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to GOYALALUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check GOYALALUM.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs HINDALUMI.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HINDALUMI.BO has a market cap of 593.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while HINDALUMI.BO trades at ₹94.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas HINDALUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINDALUMI.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to HINDALUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check HINDALUMI.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs SUDAI.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUDAI.BO has a market cap of 389.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while SUDAI.BO trades at ₹46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas SUDAI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUDAI.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to SUDAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check SUDAI.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs NIRAVCOM.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NIRAVCOM.BO has a market cap of 278.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while NIRAVCOM.BO trades at ₹710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas NIRAVCOM.BO's P/E ratio is 1731.71. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIRAVCOM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to NIRAVCOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check NIRAVCOM.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs BMAL.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BMAL.BO has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while BMAL.BO trades at ₹9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas BMAL.BO's P/E ratio is 191.60. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to BMAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check BMAL.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs PRECISION.NS Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRECISION.NS has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while PRECISION.NS trades at ₹6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas PRECISION.NS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRECISION.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to PRECISION.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check PRECISION.NS's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs MAITRI.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAITRI.BO has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while MAITRI.BO trades at ₹30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas MAITRI.BO's P/E ratio is 117.31. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAITRI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is more volatile compared to MAITRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check MAITRI.BO's competition here
CENTEXT.NS vs STURDY.BO Comparison April 2026
CENTEXT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTEXT.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STURDY.BO has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTEXT.NS is priced at ₹18.22, while STURDY.BO trades at ₹0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTEXT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.70, whereas STURDY.BO's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CENTEXT.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STURDY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTEXT.NS is less volatile compared to STURDY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTEXT.NS.Check STURDY.BO's competition here