UBS ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Closed-End Fund ETN
UBS ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Closed-End Fund ETN CEFL Peers
See (CEFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEFL | $3.64 | +1.11% | 121.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $50.11 | +0.08% | 58.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.72% |
| VTAPX | $25.13 | +0.16% | 58.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.69% |
| VFSUX | $10.45 | +0.19% | 52.5B | N/A | N/A | +4.42% |
| VFSTX | $10.45 | +0.19% | 52.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.32% |
| VGSH | $58.58 | +0.05% | 27.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.50% |
| VSBSX | $19.54 | +0.15% | 27B | N/A | N/A | +4.13% |
| VWSTX | $15.83 | +0.00% | 15.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
CEFL vs FIYY Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FFEU Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VTIP Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VTIP trades at $50.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VTAPX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VTAPX trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VFSUX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VFSUX trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VFSTX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VFSTX trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VGSH Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VGSH trades at $58.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VSBSX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VSBSX trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VWSTX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VWSTX trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs MINT Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while MINT trades at $100.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs ASBFX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while ASBFX trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SCHO Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SCHO trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs PTSHX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while PTSHX trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FTSM Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FTSM trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SPXL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SPXL trades at $181.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VFISX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VFISX trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SPTS Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SPTS trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TMF Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TMF trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VSGBX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VSGBX trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs VSGDX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while VSGDX trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs JSDHX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while JSDHX trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TECL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TECL trades at $101.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 46.19. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FLVCX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FLVCX trades at $43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs BITX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while BITX trades at $62.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FAS Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FAS trades at $167.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TBLL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TBLL trades at $105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FSTTX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FSTTX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs PAIAX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while PAIAX trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DIAYX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DIAYX trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DHFCX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DHLSX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DHLSX trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FNGU Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FNGU trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DWT Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs ORSTX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs BULZ Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while BULZ trades at $189.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 63.20. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs PRFSX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while PRFSX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SH Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SH trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs BASOX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while BASOX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs ACSNX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while ACSNX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs RYCCX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while RYCCX trades at $436.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs CPLSX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while CPLSX trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs RYVLX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while RYVLX trades at $622.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs RYVYX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while RYVYX trades at $622.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs NVDX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 842.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while NVDX trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 57.74. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TAFI Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 785M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TAFI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SOXS Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 756.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SOXS trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs EMAIX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 738.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while EMAIX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs EXMAX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 737.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while EXMAX trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DPST Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 679M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DPST trades at $101.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TUA Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 671.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TUA trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs JSCP Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 618.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while JSCP trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs GDXU Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 577.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while GDXU trades at $74.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs NUGT Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 555.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while NUGT trades at $76.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FNGO Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 528.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FNGO trades at $111.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs BPRRX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while BPRRX trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs BPIRX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while BPIRX trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs GIYAX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 505.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while GIYAX trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DGAZ Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SPXU Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 491.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SPXU trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs PSQ Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 479.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while PSQ trades at $33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DXQLX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 471M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DXQLX trades at $104.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FSMB Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 457M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FSMB trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SDHY Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 411.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SDHY trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs KOLD Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while KOLD trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SDS Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SDS trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs GGLL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 378.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while GGLL trades at $40.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SEMRX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FSHSX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FSHSX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SPXS Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 355.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SPXS trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SVIX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 352M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SVIX trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SVXY Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SVXY trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DUST Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DUST trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs UVXY Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while UVXY trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs MRRL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FLGE Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs JNUG Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 283.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while JNUG trades at $80.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs MORL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SMB Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SMB trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs DFEN Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 269.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while DFEN trades at $56.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs UUP Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while UUP trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs NAIL Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while NAIL trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs AMZU Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while AMZU trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TZA Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 247.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TZA trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs STOT Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while STOT trades at $47.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs QID Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 233.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while QID trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TENG Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs GUSH Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 226.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while GUSH trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs AAPU Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while AAPU trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FTSD Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FTSD trades at $90.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs REML Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs ERX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while ERX trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TWUSX Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TWUSX trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs FUMB Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while FUMB trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs SDOW Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while SDOW trades at $40.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs EMNT Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while EMNT trades at $98.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs CLSE Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 186.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while CLSE trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs TMV Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while TMV trades at $39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs CVSB Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while CVSB trades at $50.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.
CEFL vs RWM Comparison
CEFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEFL stands at 121.2M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CEFL is priced at $3.64, while RWM trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEFL's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEFL is more volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEFL.