iShares VII PLC - iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
iShares VII PLC - iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) CE31.L Peers
See (CE31.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE31.L | £9,682.00 | -0.03% | 176B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | £4,179.50 | +0.03% | 147.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | £12,875.50 | +0.08% | 73.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TR7S.L | £3,616.00 | +0.11% | 20.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.10% |
| EHYB.L | £3,307.25 | +0.14% | 19.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.12% |
| IB01.L | £115.90 | -0.02% | 15.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AT1D.L | £1,407.80 | +0.15% | 15.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.06% |
| UB82.L | £2,849.50 | +0.30% | 11.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.03% |
| GBP5.L | £967.35 | -0.08% | 10.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.24% |
| IEML.L | £45.04 | -0.58% | 7.8B | 1.35 | £33.40 | +5.51% |
Stock Comparison
CE31.L vs MTXX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 147.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while MTXX.L trades at £4,179.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CE01.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while CE01.L trades at £12,875.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TR7S.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, TR7S.L has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while TR7S.L trades at £3,616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR7S.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR7S.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TR7S.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EHYB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EHYB.L trades at £3,307.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IB01.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IB01.L trades at £115.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AT1D.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while AT1D.L trades at £1,407.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UB82.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while UB82.L trades at £2,849.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB82.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GBP5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GBP5.L trades at £967.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IEML.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IEML.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IEML.L trades at £45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEML.L's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGBE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IGBE.L trades at £3,282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GILI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GILI.L trades at £12,989.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CBU7.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while CBU7.L trades at £138.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLBL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GLBL.L trades at £19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBTA.L trades at £5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDIA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SDIA.L trades at £6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEGA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SEGA.L trades at £94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CU71.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while CU71.L trades at £10,252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SHYG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SHYG.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SHYG.L trades at £78.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to SHYG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VECA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VECA.L trades at £44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VECP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VECP.L trades at £41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDCP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDCP.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDCP.L trades at £46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDPA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDPA.L trades at £58.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLAD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GLAD.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GLAD.L trades at £30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GLAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLAU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GLAU.L trades at £30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GLAG.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GLAG.L trades at £25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GLAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IUAA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IUAA.L trades at £5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XBLC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XBLC.L trades at £160.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while LQDE.L trades at £101.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IE15.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IE15.L trades at £108.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUOE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SUOE.L trades at £4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IDTM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IDTM.L trades at £170.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IEMB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IEMB.L trades at £87.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while LQDA.L trades at £5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XT0D.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XT0D.L trades at £60.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERNE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while ERNE.L trades at £102.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBIL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, BBIL.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while BBIL.L trades at £115.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to BBIL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGLE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XGLE.L trades at £222.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GOVG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GOVG.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GOVG.L trades at £4,398.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GOVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SE15.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SE15.L trades at £91.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VETA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VETA.L trades at £20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VETY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VETY.L trades at £19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGSI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XGSI.L trades at £13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERN1.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while ERN1.L trades at £86.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while LQDS.L trades at £7,511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IHYU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IHYU.L trades at £93.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IHYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBTM.L trades at £126.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IDBT.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IDBT.L trades at £128.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XGGB.L trades at £241.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMGA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EMGA.L trades at £5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FLOA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while FLOA.L trades at £6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDTA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDTA.L trades at £26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDTY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDTY.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDTY.L trades at £21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEMB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SEMB.L trades at £6,526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XT01.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XT01.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XT01.L trades at £45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XT01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDCA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDCA.L trades at £59.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDUC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDUC.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDUC.L trades at £49.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDUC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDUC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to VDUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGSG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XGSG.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XGSG.L trades at £2,389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBTS.L trades at £95.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBGX.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBGX.L trades at £136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEML.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SEML.L trades at £33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs DTLA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while DTLA.L trades at £4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IHYA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IHYA.L trades at £6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VCPA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VCPA.L trades at £43.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs MDBG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, MDBG.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while MDBG.L trades at £1,037.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to MDBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while 0GGH.L trades at £4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AGGG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while AGGG.L trades at £4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBGS.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBGS.L trades at £120.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XHYG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XHYG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XHYG.L trades at £16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XHYG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VAGS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VAGS.L trades at £25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDIG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while SDIG.L trades at £100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VSCA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VSCA.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VSCA.L trades at £43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to VSCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERNA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while ERNA.L trades at £6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GCVB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GCVB.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GCVB.L trades at £52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCVB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCVB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GCVB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERNS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, ERNS.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while ERNS.L trades at £102.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to ERNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CORP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while CORP.L trades at £88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMSA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EMSA.L trades at £5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IDTL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IDTL.L trades at £3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TREX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, TREX.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while TREX.L trades at £35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TREX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TREX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMDL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EMDL.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EMDL.L trades at £42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMCA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EMCA.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EMCA.L trades at £6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs V3GU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, V3GU.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while V3GU.L trades at £5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3GU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to V3GU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XZE5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XZE5.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XZE5.L trades at £39.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZE5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZE5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XZE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDET.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDET.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDET.L trades at £42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDEA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VDEA.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VDEA.L trades at £57.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XDGU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, XDGU.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while XDGU.L trades at £12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XDGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBCI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBCI.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBCI.L trades at £194.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBCI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AT1.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, AT1.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while AT1.L trades at £27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VUTA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VUTA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VUTA.L trades at £19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VUTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLCB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, GLCB.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while GLCB.L trades at £38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLCB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GLCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CRPS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while CRPS.L trades at £66.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGLO.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IGLO.L trades at £91.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IBTL.L trades at £239.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IUAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 982.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while IUAG.L trades at £92.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRXG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, TRXG.L has a market cap of 960.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while TRXG.L trades at £2,637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TRXG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EEXF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EEXF.L has a market cap of 923.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EEXF.L trades at £92.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEXF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEXF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EEXF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VEMA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VEMA.L has a market cap of 904M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VEMA.L trades at £42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VEMT.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, VEMT.L has a market cap of 903.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while VEMT.L trades at £31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VEMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs HYLD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while HYLD.L trades at £89.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EFRN.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 176B. In comparison, EFRN.L has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at £9,682.00, while EFRN.L trades at £5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFRN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EFRN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.