iShares VII PLC - iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
iShares VII PLC - iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) CE31.L Peers
See (CE31.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CE31.L vs MTXX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, MTXX.L has a market cap of 147.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while MTXX.L trades at $4,177.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to MTXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CE01.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CE01.L has a market cap of 72.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CE01.L trades at $12,859.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to CE01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EHYB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EHYB.L has a market cap of 20.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EHYB.L trades at $3,306.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EHYB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AT1D.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, AT1D.L has a market cap of 15.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while AT1D.L trades at $1,413.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1D.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AT1D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UB82.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, UB82.L has a market cap of 11.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while UB82.L trades at $2,889.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB82.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB82.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UB82.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IB01.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IB01.L has a market cap of 11.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IB01.L trades at $115.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IB01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IB01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IB01.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GBP5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GBP5.L has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GBP5.L trades at $966.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBP5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GBP5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGBE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGBE.L has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGBE.L trades at $3,272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGBE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IEML.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IEML.L has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IEML.L trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEML.L's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEML.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GILI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GILI.L has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GILI.L trades at $12,961.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GILI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLBL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GLBL.L has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GLBL.L trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBL.L's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLBL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GLBL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CBU7.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CBU7.L has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CBU7.L trades at $137.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBU7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBU7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CBU7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IEMB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IEMB.L has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IEMB.L trades at $87.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IDTM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IDTM.L has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IDTM.L trades at $174.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IDTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDIA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SDIA.L has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SDIA.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBTA.L has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBTA.L trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CU71.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CU71.L has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CU71.L trades at $10,377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CU71.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LQDE.L has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LQDE.L trades at $100.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VECP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VECP.L has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VECP.L trades at $41.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VECP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VECA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VECA.L has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VECA.L trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VECA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VECA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XBLC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XBLC.L has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XBLC.L trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBLC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBLC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XBLC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEGA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SEGA.L has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SEGA.L trades at $94.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEGA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUOE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SUOE.L has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SUOE.L trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SUOE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IE15.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IE15.L has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IE15.L trades at $108.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IE15.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IUAA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IUAA.L has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IUAA.L trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IUAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERNE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ERNE.L has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ERNE.L trades at $102.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ERNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LQDA.L has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LQDA.L trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SE15.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SE15.L has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SE15.L trades at $91.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SE15.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SE15.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to SE15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IDBT.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IDBT.L has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IDBT.L trades at $128.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDBT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IDBT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LQDS.L has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LQDS.L trades at $7,555.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IHYU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IHYU.L has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IHYU.L trades at $95.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYU.L's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IHYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VETA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VETA.L has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VETA.L trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VETA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VETY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VETY.L has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VETY.L trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VETY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VETY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBTM.L has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBTM.L trades at $131.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERN1.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ERN1.L has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ERN1.L trades at $86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERN1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERN1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ERN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMGA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMGA.L has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMGA.L trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGLE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XGLE.L has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XGLE.L trades at $221.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGLE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGLE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGLE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XGGB.L has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XGGB.L trades at $241.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs DTLA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, DTLA.L has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while DTLA.L trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to DTLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEMB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SEMB.L has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SEMB.L trades at $6,581.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XT0D.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XT0D.L has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XT0D.L trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XT0D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGSI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XGSI.L has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XGSI.L trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XGSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGSG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XGSG.L has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XGSG.L trades at $2,400.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDPA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDPA.L has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDPA.L trades at $57.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEML.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SEML.L has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SEML.L trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEML.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDCA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDCA.L has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDCA.L trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBTS.L has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBTS.L trades at $96.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IHYA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IHYA.L has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IHYA.L trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHYA.L's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHYA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IHYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VCPA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VCPA.L has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VCPA.L trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VCPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBGX.L has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBGX.L trades at $139.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0GGH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0GGH.L has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0GGH.L trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to 0GGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FLOA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FLOA.L has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FLOA.L trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLOA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to FLOA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XHYG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XHYG.L has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XHYG.L trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XHYG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBGS.L has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBGS.L trades at $120.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AGGG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, AGGG.L has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while AGGG.L trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VSCA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VSCA.L has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VSCA.L trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VAGS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VAGS.L has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VAGS.L trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VAGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDIG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SDIG.L has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SDIG.L trades at $100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERNA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ERNA.L has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ERNA.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ERNA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDTA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDTA.L has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDTA.L trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IDTL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IDTL.L has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IDTL.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IDTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERNS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ERNS.L has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ERNS.L trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERNS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERNS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ERNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CORP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CORP.L has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CORP.L trades at $88.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CORP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMSA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMSA.L has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMSA.L trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGTM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGTM.L has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGTM.L trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGTM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGTM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGTM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XZE5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XZE5.L has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XZE5.L trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZE5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZE5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XZE5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XDGU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XDGU.L has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XDGU.L trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XDGU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDET.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDET.L has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDET.L trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDEA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDEA.L has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDEA.L trades at $57.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMCA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMCA.L has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMCA.L trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBCI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBCI.L has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBCI.L trades at $194.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBCI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMDL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMDL.L has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMDL.L trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VUTA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VUTA.L has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VUTA.L trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VUTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBTL.L has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBTL.L trades at $245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CRPS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CRPS.L has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CRPS.L trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CRPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGIG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XGIG.L has a market cap of 998.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XGIG.L trades at $2,423.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EEXF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EEXF.L has a market cap of 991.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EEXF.L trades at $92.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEXF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEXF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EEXF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IUAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IUAG.L has a market cap of 968.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IUAG.L trades at $93.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGLO.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGLO.L has a market cap of 965.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGLO.L trades at $90.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLAU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GLAU.L has a market cap of 945.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GLAU.L trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GLAU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs HYGU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, HYGU.L has a market cap of 934.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while HYGU.L trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to HYGU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VEMT.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VEMT.L has a market cap of 906.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VEMT.L trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VEMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VEMA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VEMA.L has a market cap of 903.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VEMA.L trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CRHG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CRHG.L has a market cap of 875.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CRHG.L trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CRHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TIGR.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TIGR.L has a market cap of 830.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TIGR.L trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TIGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GCVB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GCVB.L has a market cap of 807.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GCVB.L trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCVB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCVB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GCVB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs HYLD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, HYLD.L has a market cap of 806.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while HYLD.L trades at $88.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLD.L's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to HYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDHY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SDHY.L has a market cap of 793.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SDHY.L trades at $88.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY.L's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EFRN.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EFRN.L has a market cap of 793.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EFRN.L trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFRN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EFRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SUAG.L has a market cap of 766.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SUAG.L trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SUAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBGL.L has a market cap of 739.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBGL.L trades at $146.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDHA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SDHA.L has a market cap of 719.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SDHA.L trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHA.L's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDHA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SGLO.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SGLO.L has a market cap of 704.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SGLO.L trades at $68.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SGLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ERND.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ERND.L has a market cap of 701.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ERND.L trades at $101.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ERND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMCR.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMCR.L has a market cap of 700.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMCR.L trades at $89.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMCR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGLH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGLH.L has a market cap of 691.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGLH.L trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGLH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XBGG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XBGG.L has a market cap of 688.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XBGG.L trades at $6,929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XBGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs HYLA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, HYLA.L has a market cap of 684.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while HYLA.L trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLA.L's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to HYLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDHG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SDHG.L has a market cap of 631.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SDHG.L trades at $66.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JNKE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JNKE.L has a market cap of 629.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JNKE.L trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNKE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNKE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JNKE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLCB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GLCB.L has a market cap of 607.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GLCB.L trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLCB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GLCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDTY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDTY.L has a market cap of 601.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDTY.L trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AT1.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, AT1.L has a market cap of 597.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while AT1.L trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XUHY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XUHY.L has a market cap of 593.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XUHY.L trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XUHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMCP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMCP.L has a market cap of 546.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMCP.L trades at $67.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs STHE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, STHE.L has a market cap of 545.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while STHE.L trades at $73.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STHE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STHE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to STHE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CNYB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CNYB.L has a market cap of 541.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CNYB.L trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNYB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNYB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CNYB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CLIM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CLIM.L has a market cap of 536.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CLIM.L trades at $41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIM.L's P/E ratio is 1467.86. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLIM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CLIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDCP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDCP.L has a market cap of 534.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDCP.L trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TREX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TREX.L has a market cap of 523.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TREX.L trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TREX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TREX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUSU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SUSU.L has a market cap of 503.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SUSU.L trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUSU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SUSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMES.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMES.L has a market cap of 491.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMES.L trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBGY.L has a market cap of 482.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBGY.L trades at $123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGY.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGIL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGIL.L has a market cap of 478.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGIL.L trades at $158.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SGIL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SGIL.L has a market cap of 471.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SGIL.L trades at $119.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SGIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRES.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRES.L has a market cap of 459.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRES.L trades at $36.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CRPA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CRPA.L has a market cap of 452.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CRPA.L trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CRPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VUTY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VUTY.L has a market cap of 451.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VUTY.L trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUTY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUTY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VUTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBTU.L has a market cap of 449.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBTU.L trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AT1P.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, AT1P.L has a market cap of 449.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while AT1P.L trades at $2,067.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1P.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1P.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to AT1P.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs STHY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, STHY.L has a market cap of 445.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while STHY.L trades at $93.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to STHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FSMP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FSMP.L has a market cap of 432.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FSMP.L trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to FSMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBIL.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, BBIL.L has a market cap of 405.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while BBIL.L trades at $115.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to BBIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0UCF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0UCF.L has a market cap of 402.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0UCF.L trades at $101.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UCF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0UCF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0UCF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRXG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRXG.L has a market cap of 393.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRXG.L trades at $2,672.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TRXG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GLAG.L has a market cap of 372.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GLAG.L trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GLAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XUEB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XUEB.L has a market cap of 361.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XUEB.L trades at $39.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUEB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XUEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDUC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDUC.L has a market cap of 356.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDUC.L trades at $49.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDUC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDUC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDUC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBGZ.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBGZ.L has a market cap of 347.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBGZ.L trades at $127.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGZ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBGZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SSHY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SSHY.L has a market cap of 335.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SSHY.L trades at $70.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SSHY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GIL5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GIL5.L has a market cap of 333.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GIL5.L trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIL5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIL5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GIL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GOVG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GOVG.L has a market cap of 315.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GOVG.L trades at $4,398.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GOVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs USFR.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, USFR.L has a market cap of 283.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while USFR.L trades at $50.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USFR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to USFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FLRG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FLRG.L has a market cap of 273.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FLRG.L trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLRG.L's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to FLRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UESD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, UESD.L has a market cap of 268.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while UESD.L trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UESD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UESD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UESD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FLO5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FLO5.L has a market cap of 267.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FLO5.L trades at $385.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLO5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLO5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to FLO5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VUSC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VUSC.L has a market cap of 266.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VUSC.L trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VUSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs RISE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, RISE.L has a market cap of 266.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while RISE.L trades at $402.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RISE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RISE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to RISE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 020Y.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 020Y.L has a market cap of 260.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 020Y.L trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 020Y.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 020Y.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to 020Y.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGLA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGLA.L has a market cap of 244.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGLA.L trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XT01.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XT01.L has a market cap of 240.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XT01.L trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT01.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XT01.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XT01.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IBTG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IBTG.L has a market cap of 239.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IBTG.L trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBTG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBTG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IBTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XQUA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XQUA.L has a market cap of 234.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XQUA.L trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XQUA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQUA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XQUA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IFRB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IFRB.L has a market cap of 233.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IFRB.L trades at $128.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFRB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IFRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FVUG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FVUG.L has a market cap of 231.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FVUG.L trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVUG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FVUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to FVUG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XZBD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XZBD.L has a market cap of 229.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XZBD.L trades at $41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZBD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZBD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XZBD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBM3.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, BBM3.L has a market cap of 221.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while BBM3.L trades at $85.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBM3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBM3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to BBM3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GLAD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GLAD.L has a market cap of 215.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GLAD.L trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GLAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMD5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMD5.L has a market cap of 210.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMD5.L trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMD5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMD5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EMD5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FEMP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FEMP.L has a market cap of 203.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FEMP.L trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEMP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEMP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to FEMP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs WNGE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, WNGE.L has a market cap of 195.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while WNGE.L trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNGE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to WNGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IRCP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IRCP.L has a market cap of 190.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IRCP.L trades at $98.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRCP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRCP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IRCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQEE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LQEE.L has a market cap of 179.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LQEE.L trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQEE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQEE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SDEU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SDEU.L has a market cap of 178.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SDEU.L trades at $103.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SDEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GAAA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GAAA.L has a market cap of 176.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GAAA.L trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GAAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IAAA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IAAA.L has a market cap of 175.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IAAA.L trades at $79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IAAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRS5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRS5.L has a market cap of 171.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRS5.L trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRS5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRS5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TRS5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMUS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMUS.L has a market cap of 165.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMUS.L trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMDG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMDG.L has a market cap of 158.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMDG.L trades at $684.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs WIAU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, WIAU.L has a market cap of 156.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while WIAU.L trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIAU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIAU.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to WIAU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs J15R.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, J15R.L has a market cap of 152.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while J15R.L trades at $90.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas J15R.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to J15R.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to J15R.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs USIG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, USIG.L has a market cap of 149.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while USIG.L trades at $92.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to USIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs WIGG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, WIGG.L has a market cap of 148.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while WIGG.L trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to WIGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMLI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMLI.L has a market cap of 148.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMLI.L trades at $64.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMLI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMLI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EMLI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRE7.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRE7.L has a market cap of 145.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRE7.L trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRE7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRE7.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TRE7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JMBA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JMBA.L has a market cap of 145.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JMBA.L trades at $105.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMBA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMBA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JMBA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUOG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SUOG.L has a market cap of 135.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SUOG.L trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SUOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRS3.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRS3.L has a market cap of 132.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRS3.L trades at $48.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRS3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRS3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TRS3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SAAA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SAAA.L has a market cap of 131.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SAAA.L trades at $59.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SAAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs USDC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, USDC.L has a market cap of 130.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while USDC.L trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L and USDC.L have similar daily volatility (0.07).
CE31.L vs EMUG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMUG.L has a market cap of 125.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMUG.L trades at $649.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMUG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMUG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs MDBG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, MDBG.L has a market cap of 125.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while MDBG.L trades at $1,035.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to MDBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUSC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SUSC.L has a market cap of 120.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SUSC.L trades at $49.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SUSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XYLD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XYLD.L has a market cap of 117.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XYLD.L trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYLD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRE3.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRE3.L has a market cap of 114.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRE3.L trades at $38.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRE3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRE3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TRE3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JPMB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JPMB.L has a market cap of 113.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JPMB.L trades at $79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPMB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPMB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to JPMB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GILG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GILG.L has a market cap of 112.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GILG.L trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GILG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs USIX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, USIX.L has a market cap of 112.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while USIX.L trades at $6,974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to USIX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMLP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMLP.L has a market cap of 111.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMLP.L trades at $87.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IHHG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IHHG.L has a market cap of 109.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IHHG.L trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHHG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHHG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IHHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VAGP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VAGP.L has a market cap of 108.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VAGP.L trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VAGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs DRGN.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, DRGN.L has a market cap of 104.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while DRGN.L trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRGN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRGN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to DRGN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VGPA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VGPA.L has a market cap of 103.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VGPA.L trades at $47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VGPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TSY3.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TSY3.L has a market cap of 99.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TSY3.L trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSY3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSY3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TSY3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XZBU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XZBU.L has a market cap of 96.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XZBU.L trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZBU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZBU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XZBU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JU13.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JU13.L has a market cap of 91.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JU13.L trades at $113.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JU13.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JU13.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JU13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SUSD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SUSD.L has a market cap of 90.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SUSD.L trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to SUSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs HYSD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, HYSD.L has a market cap of 89.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while HYSD.L trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to HYSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TR3G.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TR3G.L has a market cap of 86.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TR3G.L trades at $2,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR3G.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR3G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TR3G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IEAH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IEAH.L has a market cap of 85.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IEAH.L trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEAH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEAH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IEAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs V3GS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, V3GS.L has a market cap of 85.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while V3GS.L trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3GS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to V3GS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMGB.L has a market cap of 83.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMGB.L trades at $46.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMGB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQDH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LQDH.L has a market cap of 83.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LQDH.L trades at $103.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQDH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TIGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TIGB.L has a market cap of 83.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TIGB.L trades at $3,993.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TIGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LUSC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LUSC.L has a market cap of 81.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LUSC.L trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUSC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LUSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LCRP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LCRP.L has a market cap of 81.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LCRP.L trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LCRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGEA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGEA.L has a market cap of 81.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGEA.L trades at $89.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to IGEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs IGAA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, IGAA.L has a market cap of 81.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while IGAA.L trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to IGAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TAHY.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TAHY.L has a market cap of 77.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TAHY.L trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAHY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TAHY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GFA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GFA.L has a market cap of 77.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GFA.L trades at $68.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFA.L's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JPBM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JPBM.L has a market cap of 74.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JPBM.L trades at $59.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPBM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPBM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to JPBM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ISXF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ISXF.L has a market cap of 70.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ISXF.L trades at $103.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISXF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISXF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ISXF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMH5.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMH5.L has a market cap of 70.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMH5.L trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMH5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMH5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EMH5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs J13U.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, J13U.L has a market cap of 69.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while J13U.L trades at $85.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas J13U.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to J13U.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to J13U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SGEA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SGEA.L has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SGEA.L trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SGEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CCBO.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CCBO.L has a market cap of 58.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CCBO.L trades at $87.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCBO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to CCBO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JHYU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JHYU.L has a market cap of 56.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JHYU.L trades at $118.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JHYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to JHYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEMH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SEMH.L has a market cap of 52.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SEMH.L trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FSMF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FSMF.L has a market cap of 51.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FSMF.L trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to FSMF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs V3GP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, V3GP.L has a market cap of 51.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while V3GP.L trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3GP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to V3GP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs PEMD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, PEMD.L has a market cap of 50.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while PEMD.L trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to PEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LUTR.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LUTR.L has a market cap of 50.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LUTR.L trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUTR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to LUTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SEMC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SEMC.L has a market cap of 47.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SEMC.L trades at $811.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to SEMC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRGB.L has a market cap of 46.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRGB.L trades at $3,340.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TRGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBTP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, BBTP.L has a market cap of 46.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while BBTP.L trades at $76.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBTP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBTP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to BBTP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRIA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRIA.L has a market cap of 45.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRIA.L trades at $46.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRIA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TRIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs V3GU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, V3GU.L has a market cap of 45.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while V3GU.L trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V3GU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to V3GU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147ME.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147ME.L has a market cap of 41.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147ME.L trades at $93.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147ME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147ME.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147ME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147MD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147MD.L has a market cap of 41.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147MD.L trades at $126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147MD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147MD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147MD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00009WXM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00009WXM.L has a market cap of 41.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00009WXM.L trades at $50.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00009WXM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00009WXM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00009WXM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000FXJW.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000FXJW.L has a market cap of 41.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000FXJW.L trades at $98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000FXJW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000FXJW.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000FXJW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs LQGH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, LQGH.L has a market cap of 41.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while LQGH.L trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQGH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQGH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to LQGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JRUP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JRUP.L has a market cap of 41.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JRUP.L trades at $81.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to JRUP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBTR.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, BBTR.L has a market cap of 41.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while BBTR.L trades at $103.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBTR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to BBTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs HYEM.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, HYEM.L has a market cap of 38.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while HYEM.L trades at $125.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to HYEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs T1AP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, T1AP.L has a market cap of 34.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while T1AP.L trades at $3,491.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T1AP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to T1AP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to T1AP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EGOG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EGOG.L has a market cap of 33.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EGOG.L trades at $1,123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to EGOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JMBP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JMBP.L has a market cap of 32.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JMBP.L trades at $59.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMBP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMBP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JMBP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TR7S.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TR7S.L has a market cap of 32.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TR7S.L trades at $3,611.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR7S.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR7S.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to TR7S.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBRT.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, BBRT.L has a market cap of 30.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while BBRT.L trades at $77.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBRT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBRT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to BBRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AEGG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, AEGG.L has a market cap of 30.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while AEGG.L trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AEGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FRGP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FRGP.L has a market cap of 29.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FRGP.L trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to FRGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TRSX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TRSX.L has a market cap of 28.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TRSX.L trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRSX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TRSX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs STHS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, STHS.L has a market cap of 27.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while STHS.L trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to STHS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs TREI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, TREI.L has a market cap of 26.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while TREI.L trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TREI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to TREI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GISG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GISG.L has a market cap of 25.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GISG.L trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GISG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GISG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GISG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs CGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, CGB.L has a market cap of 23.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while CGB.L trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to CGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs AT1S.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, AT1S.L has a market cap of 23.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while AT1S.L trades at $3,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AT1S.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AT1S.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to AT1S.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JRUB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JRUB.L has a market cap of 22.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JRUB.L trades at $118.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to JRUB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs PR1T.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, PR1T.L has a market cap of 22.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while PR1T.L trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1T.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PR1T.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to PR1T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs USIC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, USIC.L has a market cap of 20.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while USIC.L trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to USIC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UB74.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, UB74.L has a market cap of 18.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while UB74.L trades at $1,837.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB74.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB74.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UB74.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JRBU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JRBU.L has a market cap of 16.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JRBU.L trades at $88.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRBU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRBU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JRBU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XCO2.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XCO2.L has a market cap of 15.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XCO2.L trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCO2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCO2.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XCO2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FRUC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FRUC.L has a market cap of 14.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FRUC.L trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRUC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRUC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to FRUC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs BBGE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, BBGE.L has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while BBGE.L trades at $79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to BBGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FSED.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FSED.L has a market cap of 12.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FSED.L trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSED.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to FSED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147MG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147MG.L has a market cap of 11.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147MG.L trades at $121.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147MG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147MG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147MG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000YX0L.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000YX0L.L has a market cap of 11.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000YX0L.L trades at $123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000YX0L.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000YX0L.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000YX0L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147MF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147MF.L has a market cap of 11.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147MF.L trades at $99.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147MF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147MF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147MF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000YX0K.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000YX0K.L has a market cap of 11.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000YX0K.L trades at $99.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000YX0K.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000YX0K.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000YX0K.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs EMAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, EMAG.L has a market cap of 11.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while EMAG.L trades at $790.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to EMAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SPEH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SPEH.L has a market cap of 9.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SPEH.L trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to SPEH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs COGO.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, COGO.L has a market cap of 8.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while COGO.L trades at $8,996.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COGO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COGO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to COGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs DDBG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, DDBG.L has a market cap of 8.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while DDBG.L trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to DDBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JCAG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JCAG.L has a market cap of 7.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JCAG.L trades at $94.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCAG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCAG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JCAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UHYP.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, UHYP.L has a market cap of 7.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while UHYP.L trades at $2,828.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UHYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UHYP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UHYP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs COCB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, COCB.L has a market cap of 7.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while COCB.L trades at $128.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COCB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COCB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to COCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs KLMG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, KLMG.L has a market cap of 7.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while KLMG.L trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLMG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLMG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to KLMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UBXX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, UBXX.L has a market cap of 5.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while UBXX.L trades at $825.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBXX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UBXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 5SIE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 5SIE.L has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 5SIE.L trades at $1,530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5SIE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5SIE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to 5SIE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs ITEH.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, ITEH.L has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while ITEH.L trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITEH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to ITEH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs KBND.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, KBND.L has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while KBND.L trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBND.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to KBND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GOUD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GOUD.L has a market cap of 1.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GOUD.L trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to GOUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XGBB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XGBB.L has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XGBB.L trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGBB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGBB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to XGBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs GOVD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, GOVD.L has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while GOVD.L trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOVD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to GOVD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SPPB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SPPB.L has a market cap of 927499.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SPPB.L trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to SPPB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs UHYD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, UHYD.L has a market cap of 458094.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while UHYD.L trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UHYD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UHYD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to UHYD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs VDTS.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, VDTS.L has a market cap of 337116.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while VDTS.L trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDTS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is less volatile compared to VDTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JIBG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JIBG.L has a market cap of 302633.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JIBG.L trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JIBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JIBG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JIBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs FGOV.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, FGOV.L has a market cap of 296603.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while FGOV.L trades at $1,466.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGOV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to FGOV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs XZUD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, XZUD.L has a market cap of 99783.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while XZUD.L trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to XZUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147LZ.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147LZ.L has a market cap of 11579.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147LZ.L trades at $115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147LZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147LZ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147LZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001C5T8.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001C5T8.L has a market cap of 11446.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001C5T8.L trades at $114.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001C5T8.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001C5T8.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001C5T8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00011WUD.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00011WUD.L has a market cap of 10631.00. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00011WUD.L trades at $106.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011WUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011WUD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00011WUD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001OF1Z.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001OF1Z.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001OF1Z.L trades at $108.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001OF1Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001OF1Z.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001OF1Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000KM25.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000KM25.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000KM25.L trades at $96.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000KM25.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000KM25.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000KM25.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000KM26.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000KM26.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000KM26.L trades at $133.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000KM26.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000KM26.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000KM26.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147MB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147MB.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147MB.L trades at $82.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147MB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147MB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147MB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00011WUA.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00011WUA.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00011WUA.L trades at $116.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011WUA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011WUA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00011WUA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147MC.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147MC.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147MC.L trades at $99.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147MC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147MC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147MC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147LV.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147LV.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147LV.L trades at $115.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147LV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147LV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147LV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs SHYG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SHYG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SHYG.L trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHYG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHYG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CE31.L has daily volatility of 0.07 and SHYG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CE31.L vs SGSU.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, SGSU.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while SGSU.L trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CE31.L has daily volatility of 0.07 and SGSU.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CE31.L vs 0P000147LW.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147LW.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147LW.L trades at $93.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147LW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147LW.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147LW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001J1WK.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001J1WK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001J1WK.L trades at $96.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001J1WK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001J1WK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001J1WK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001BLQI.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001BLQI.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001BLQI.L trades at $119.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001BLQI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001BLQI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001BLQI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00011WUG.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00011WUG.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00011WUG.L trades at $123.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011WUG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011WUG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00011WUG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001C5T4.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001C5T4.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001C5T4.L trades at $113.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001C5T4.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001C5T4.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001C5T4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001CXIX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001CXIX.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001CXIX.L trades at $87.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001CXIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001CXIX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001CXIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001C5T6.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001C5T6.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001C5T6.L trades at $109.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001C5T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001C5T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001C5T6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs JIGB.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, JIGB.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while JIGB.L trades at $76.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JIGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JIGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to JIGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001CGI6.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001CGI6.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001CGI6.L trades at $90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001CGI6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001CGI6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001CGI6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001LJIX.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001LJIX.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001LJIX.L trades at $83.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001LJIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001LJIX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001LJIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001IU24.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001IU24.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001IU24.L trades at $122.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001IU24.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001IU24.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001IU24.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001C6H6.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001C6H6.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001C6H6.L trades at $109.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001C6H6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001C6H6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001C6H6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0001OF22.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0001OF22.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0001OF22.L trades at $102.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001OF22.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001OF22.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0001OF22.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00011WUF.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00011WUF.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00011WUF.L trades at $124.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011WUF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011WUF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00011WUF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00011WUE.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00011WUE.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00011WUE.L trades at $114.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011WUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011WUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00011WUE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P00011WU9.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P00011WU9.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P00011WU9.L trades at $100.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011WU9.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00011WU9.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P00011WU9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000KM24.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000KM24.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000KM24.L trades at $154.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000KM24.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000KM24.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000KM24.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P000147M0.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P000147M0.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P000147M0.L trades at $99.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000147M0.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P000147M0.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P000147M0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
CE31.L vs 0P0000KM23.L Comparison
CE31.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CE31.L stands at 161.18B. In comparison, 0P0000KM23.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CE31.L is priced at $9,726.50, while 0P0000KM23.L trades at $121.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CE31.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000KM23.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE31.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000KM23.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CE31.L is more volatile compared to 0P0000KM23.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE31.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE31.L | $9,726.50 | -0.09% | 161.18B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MTXX.L | $4,177.75 | -0.24% | 147.76B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CE01.L | $12,859.50 | -0.30% | 72.20B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EHYB.L | $3,306.75 | +0.18% | 20.47B | N/A | N/A | +3.13% |
| AT1D.L | $1,413.50 | +0.24% | 15.46B | N/A | N/A | +0.06% |
| UB82.L | $2,889.00 | -0.17% | 11.73B | N/A | N/A | +2.98% |
| IB01.L | $115.68 | +0.02% | 11.70B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GBP5.L | $966.00 | -0.06% | 10.19B | N/A | N/A | +4.24% |
| IGBE.L | $3,272.00 | -0.14% | 8.14B | N/A | N/A | +4.71% |
| IEML.L | $44.52 | +0.09% | 7.66B | 1.33 | $33.40 | +5.84% |