Carson Development Corporation

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SUHJY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SUHJY trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUHJY's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SUHJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SUHJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SUHJY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SUHJF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SUHJF trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUHJF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SUHJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SUHJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SUHJF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CRBJY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CRBJY trades at $36.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CRBJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CRBJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CRBJY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CRBJF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CRBJF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBJF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CRBJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CRBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRBJF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DWAHY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DWAHY trades at $34.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWAHY's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DWAHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DWAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check DWAHY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DWAHF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DWAHF trades at $33.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWAHF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DWAHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DWAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check DWAHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAOVY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAOVY trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOVY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOVY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CAOVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOVY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAOVF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAOVF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOVF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CAOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CAOVF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CNGKY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CNGKY trades at $9.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNGKY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CNGKY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CNGKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNGKY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHKGF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHKGF trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKGF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHKGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CHKGF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, PDGRY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while PDGRY trades at $200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDGRY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to PDGRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to PDGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check PDGRY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, HKHGF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while HKHGF trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKHGF's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to HKHGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and HKHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKHGF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, HNGKY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while HNGKY trades at $31.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNGKY's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to HNGKY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to HNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check HNGKY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SNLAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SNLAY trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLAY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SNLAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and SNLAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNLAY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SNLAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SNLAF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLAF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SNLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SNLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SNLAF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DWHHF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DWHHF trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWHHF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DWHHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DWHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check DWHHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CTPVF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CTPVF trades at $19.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPVF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CTPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTPVF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHVKF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHVKF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHVKF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHVKF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CHVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHVKF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, WARFF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while WARFF trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARFF's P/E ratio is -22.08. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to WARFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to WARFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check WARFF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, WARFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while WARFY trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARFY's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to WARFY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and WARFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WARFY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LGFRY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LGFRY trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGFRY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LGFRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to LGFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check LGFRY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LNGPF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LNGPF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNGPF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LNGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to LNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check LNGPF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SCCCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SCCCF trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCCF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SCCCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and SCCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCCCF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AYAAF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AYAAF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAAF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AYAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check AYAAF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CWQXF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CWQXF trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWQXF's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CWQXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CWQXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWQXF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DTCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DTCWY trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTCWY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DTCWY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DTCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check DTCWY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHVKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHVKY trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHVKY's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHVKY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CHVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHVKY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SZENF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SZENF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZENF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SZENF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and SZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZENF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CWQXY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CWQXY trades at $19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWQXY's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CWQXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CWQXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CWQXY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, UOLGY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while UOLGY trades at $21.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOLGY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to UOLGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to UOLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check UOLGY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, UOLGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while UOLGF trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOLGF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to UOLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and UOLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UOLGF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KRYPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KRYPF trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KRYPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and KRYPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRYPF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CTRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CTRYY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CTRYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CTRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRYY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CDEVY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CDEVY trades at $4.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDEVY's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDEVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CDEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CDEVY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KRYPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KRYPY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYPY's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KRYPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and KRYPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRYPY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CDEVF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CDEVF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDEVF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDEVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CDEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDEVF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CFFHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CFFHF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFFHF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CFFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CFFHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFFHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BRKFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BRKFF trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKFF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BRKFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and BRKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRKFF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, EGRNY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while EGRNY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRNY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to EGRNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and EGRNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGRNY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAIAF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAIAF trades at $27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAIAF's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAIAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CAIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAIAF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GTWCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GTWCF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTWCF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GTWCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to GTWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check GTWCF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SIMEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SIMEF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMEF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SIMEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SIMEF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CJNHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CJNHF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJNHF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CJNHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CJNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CJNHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, ARLLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while ARLLF trades at $81.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLLF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to ARLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to ARLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check ARLLF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SHMAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SHMAY trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMAY's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMAY's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SHMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SHMAY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FRSHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FRSHY trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSHY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSHY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FRSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRSHY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BSPDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BSPDY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSPDY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BSPDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BSPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check BSPDY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LDHUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LDHUF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDHUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LDHUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to LDHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check LDHUF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, RBLAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while RBLAY trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBLAY's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to RBLAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to RBLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check RBLAY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, MGAWF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while MGAWF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAWF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to MGAWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to MGAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check MGAWF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, MGAWY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while MGAWY trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAWY's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to MGAWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to MGAWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check MGAWY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YLDGF has a market cap of 936.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YLDGF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLDGF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YLDGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and YLDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLDGF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AGPYF has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AGPYF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGPYF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AGPYF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AGPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check AGPYF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SZNTF has a market cap of 776.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SZNTF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZNTF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SZNTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SZNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SZNTF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KWHAF has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KWHAF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWHAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KWHAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KWHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check KWHAF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, TIACF has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while TIACF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIACF's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to TIACF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and TIACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIACF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAOYF has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAOYF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOYF's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CAOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOYF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YLDGY has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YLDGY trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLDGY's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YLDGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to YLDGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check YLDGY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, PHKIF has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while PHKIF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHKIF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to PHKIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and PHKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHKIF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DRUNF has a market cap of 615.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DRUNF trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRUNF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DRUNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check DRUNF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LPHHF has a market cap of 608M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LPHHF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPHHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LPHHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and LPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPHHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CCLHF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CCLHF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CCLHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CCLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check CCLHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BEIJF has a market cap of 521.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BEIJF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEIJF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BEIJF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BEIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check BEIJF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AYAAY has a market cap of 459.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AYAAY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAAY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AYAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check AYAAY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CDCTF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CDCTF trades at $12.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDCTF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CDCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDCTF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, WFICF has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while WFICF trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFICF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to WFICF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to WFICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check WFICF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SIOPF has a market cap of 378.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SIOPF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIOPF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SIOPF's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and SIOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIOPF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GZUHF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GZUHF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZUHF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GZUHF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GZUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZUHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SOLLF has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SOLLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLLF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SOLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SOLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SOLLF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, MODVF has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while MODVF trades at $10.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODVF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to MODVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and MODVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MODVF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AGPYY has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AGPYY trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGPYY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AGPYY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and AGPYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGPYY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SIUDF has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SIUDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIUDF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SIUDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SIUDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SIUDF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FRTCF has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FRTCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTCF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FRTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTCF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KWGPF has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KWGPF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWGPF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KWGPF's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KWGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check KWGPF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GNLAF has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GNLAF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNLAF's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GNLAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GNLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNLAF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, TMPPF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while TMPPF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMPPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to TMPPF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and TMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMPPF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DRSLF has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DRSLF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DRSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and DRSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRSLF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YUZHF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YUZHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUZHF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YUZHF's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and YUZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUZHF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FHRT has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FHRT trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHRT's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FHRT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FHRT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FHRT's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GCCO has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GCCO trades at $1,650.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GCCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCCO's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BAKBF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BAKBF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAKBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BAKBF's ROE of +3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and BAKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAKBF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, ILAL has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while ILAL trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILAL's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to ILAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to ILAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check ILAL's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GZUHY has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GZUHY trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZUHY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GZUHY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to GZUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check GZUHY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KDCCF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KDCCF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDCCF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KDCCF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KDCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check KDCCF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CTRYF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CTRYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CTRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CTRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRYF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SOLLY has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SOLLY trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLLY's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SOLLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SOLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SOLLY's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SRRE has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SRRE trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SRRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check SRRE's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YTRGF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YTRGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTRGF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YTRGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to YTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check YTRGF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, UCASU has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while UCASU trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCASU's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to UCASU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to UCASU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check UCASU's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, HIHI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while HIHI trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIHI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to HIHI's ROE of +6.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to HIHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check HIHI's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, URBDF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while URBDF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBDF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to URBDF's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and URBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URBDF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, RGSG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while RGSG trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGSG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to RGSG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and RGSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGSG's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GRLT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GRLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GRLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to GRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check GRLT's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FLLLF has a market cap of 267.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FLLLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLLLF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FLLLF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FLLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLLLF's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHIT has a market cap of 188.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CHIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHIT's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, XTRM has a market cap of 80.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while XTRM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to XTRM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and XTRM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XTRM's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GLCO has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GLCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCO's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BAYP has a market cap of 37.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BAYP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BAYP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and BAYP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAYP's competition here

CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BPCP has a market cap of 33.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BPCP trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BPCP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BPCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.Check BPCP's competition here