Carson Development Corporation
Carson Development Corporation CDVM Peers
See (CDVM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDVM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 270.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SUHJY | $11.99 | +1.01% | 34.7B | 15.57 | $0.77 | +3.85% |
| SUHJF | $11.14 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 14.47 | $0.77 | +4.33% |
| CRBJF | $3.60 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 7.20 | $0.50 | +1.46% |
| CRBJY | $32.80 | +0.00% | 23.4B | 6.55 | $5.01 | +5.60% |
| DWAHF | $36.81 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 10.37 | $3.55 | +1.34% |
| DWAHY | $33.97 | -0.46% | 21B | 9.57 | $3.55 | +1.84% |
| CAOVY | $8.66 | -2.91% | 19B | 8.66 | $1.00 | +4.09% |
| CAOVF | $1.51 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 7.55 | $0.20 | +5.10% |
| CNGKY | $9.04 | +3.91% | 16B | 9.13 | $0.99 | +4.73% |
Stock Comparison
CDVM vs SUHJY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SUHJY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SUHJY trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUHJY's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SUHJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SUHJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SUHJF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SUHJF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SUHJF trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUHJF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SUHJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SUHJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CRBJF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CRBJF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CRBJF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBJF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CRBJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CRBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CRBJY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CRBJY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CRBJY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBJY's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CRBJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CRBJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs DWAHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DWAHF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DWAHF trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWAHF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DWAHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DWAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs DWAHY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DWAHY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DWAHY trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWAHY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DWAHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DWAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CAOVY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAOVY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAOVY trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOVY's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOVY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CAOVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CAOVF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAOVF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAOVF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOVF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CAOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CNGKY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CNGKY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CNGKY trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNGKY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CNGKY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CHKGF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHKGF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHKGF trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKGF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHKGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CHKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs HNGKY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, HNGKY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while HNGKY trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNGKY's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to HNGKY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to HNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs PDGRY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, PDGRY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while PDGRY trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDGRY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to PDGRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to PDGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs HKHGF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, HKHGF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while HKHGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKHGF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to HKHGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to HKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CHVKF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHVKF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHVKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHVKF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHVKF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CHVKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SNLAY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SNLAY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SNLAY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLAY's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SNLAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SNLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SNLAF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SNLAF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SNLAF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLAF's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SNLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SNLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs DWHHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DWHHF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DWHHF trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWHHF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DWHHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DWHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs WARFY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, WARFY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while WARFY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARFY's P/E ratio is -23.15. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to WARFY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to WARFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs WARFF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, WARFF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while WARFF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARFF's P/E ratio is -21.23. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to WARFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to WARFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs LGFRY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LGFRY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LGFRY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGFRY's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LGFRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to LGFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs LNGPF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LNGPF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LNGPF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNGPF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LNGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to LNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CTPVF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CTPVF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CTPVF trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPVF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CTPVF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CTPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs SCCCF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SCCCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SCCCF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCCF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SCCCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and SCCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CWQXF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CWQXF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CWQXF trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWQXF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CWQXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CWQXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs AYAAF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AYAAF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AYAAF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAAF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AYAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs DTCWY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DTCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DTCWY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTCWY's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DTCWY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and DTCWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CHVKY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHVKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHVKY trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHVKY's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHVKY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CHVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SZENF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SZENF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SZENF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZENF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SZENF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and SZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CWQXY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CWQXY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CWQXY trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWQXY's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CWQXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CWQXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs UOLGF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, UOLGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while UOLGF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOLGF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to UOLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and UOLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs UOLGY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, UOLGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while UOLGY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOLGY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to UOLGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to UOLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs KRYPF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KRYPF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KRYPF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYPF's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KRYPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KRYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CTRYY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CTRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CTRYY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CTRYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CTRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs KRYPY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KRYPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KRYPY trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYPY's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KRYPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and KRYPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CDEVY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CDEVY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CDEVY trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDEVY's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDEVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CDEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CDEVF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CDEVF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CDEVF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDEVF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDEVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CFFHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CFFHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CFFHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFFHF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CFFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CFFHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs BRKFF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BRKFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BRKFF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKFF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BRKFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and BRKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs EGRNY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, EGRNY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while EGRNY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRNY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to EGRNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and EGRNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CAIAF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAIAF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAIAF's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAIAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CAIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs GTWCF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GTWCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GTWCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTWCF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GTWCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to GTWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SIMEF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SIMEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SIMEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMEF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SIMEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CJNHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CJNHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CJNHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJNHF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CJNHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CJNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs ARLLF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, ARLLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while ARLLF trades at $81.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLLF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to ARLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to ARLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SHMAY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SHMAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SHMAY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMAY's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SHMAY's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SHMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs FRSHY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FRSHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FRSHY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSHY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSHY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FRSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs BSPDY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BSPDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BSPDY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSPDY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BSPDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BSPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs LDHUF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LDHUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LDHUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDHUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LDHUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to LDHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs RBLAY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, RBLAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while RBLAY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBLAY's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to RBLAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and RBLAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs MGAWY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, MGAWY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while MGAWY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAWY's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to MGAWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and MGAWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs MGAWF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, MGAWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while MGAWF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAWF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to MGAWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to MGAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs GZUHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GZUHF has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GZUHF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZUHF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GZUHF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to GZUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs YLDGF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YLDGF has a market cap of 861.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YLDGF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLDGF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YLDGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to YLDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs AGPYF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AGPYF has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AGPYF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGPYF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AGPYF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AGPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SZNTF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SZNTF has a market cap of 776.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SZNTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZNTF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SZNTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SZNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs KWHAF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KWHAF has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KWHAF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWHAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KWHAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KWHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs TIACF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, TIACF has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while TIACF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIACF's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to TIACF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and TIACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CAOYF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CAOYF has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CAOYF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOYF's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CAOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs YLDGY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YLDGY has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YLDGY trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLDGY's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YLDGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to YLDGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs DRUNF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DRUNF has a market cap of 657.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DRUNF trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRUNF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DRUNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to DRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs PHKIF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, PHKIF has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while PHKIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHKIF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to PHKIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to PHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs LPHHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, LPHHF has a market cap of 608M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while LPHHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPHHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to LPHHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and LPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CCLHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CCLHF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CCLHF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CCLHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to CCLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs BEIJF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BEIJF has a market cap of 542M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BEIJF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEIJF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BEIJF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BEIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs AYAAY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AYAAY has a market cap of 459.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AYAAY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAAY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AYAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CDCTF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CDCTF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CDCTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDCTF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CDCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CDCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs WFICF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, WFICF has a market cap of 421.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while WFICF trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFICF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to WFICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to WFICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SIOPF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SIOPF has a market cap of 416.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SIOPF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIOPF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SIOPF's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SIOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SOLLF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SOLLF has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SOLLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLLF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SOLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SOLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs MODVF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, MODVF has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while MODVF trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODVF's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to MODVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to MODVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs AGPYY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, AGPYY has a market cap of 237.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while AGPYY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGPYY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to AGPYY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to AGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs FRTCF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FRTCF has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FRTCF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTCF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to FRTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SIUDF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SIUDF has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SIUDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIUDF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SIUDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SIUDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs KWGPF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KWGPF has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KWGPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWGPF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KWGPF's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KWGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs GNLAF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GNLAF has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GNLAF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNLAF's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GNLAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GNLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs TMPPF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, TMPPF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while TMPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMPPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to TMPPF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and TMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs DRSLF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, DRSLF has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while DRSLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to DRSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and DRSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs YUZHF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YUZHF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YUZHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUZHF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YUZHF's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and YUZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs FHRT Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FHRT has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FHRT trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHRT's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FHRT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FHRT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs GCCO Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GCCO has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GCCO trades at $1,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GCCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs BAKBF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BAKBF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BAKBF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAKBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BAKBF's ROE of +3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and BAKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs GZUHY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GZUHY has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GZUHY trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZUHY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GZUHY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to GZUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs KDCCF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, KDCCF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while KDCCF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDCCF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to KDCCF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to KDCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs ILAL Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, ILAL has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while ILAL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILAL's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to ILAL's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to ILAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs CTRYF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CTRYF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CTRYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CTRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CTRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs SOLLY Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SOLLY has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SOLLY trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLLY's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SOLLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SOLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs SRRE Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, SRRE has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while SRRE trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to SRRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to SRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs YTRGF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, YTRGF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while YTRGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTRGF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to YTRGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to YTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs UCASU Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, UCASU has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while UCASU trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCASU's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to UCASU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and UCASU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs HIHI Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, HIHI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while HIHI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIHI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to HIHI's ROE of +6.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to HIHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs URBDF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, URBDF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while URBDF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBDF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to URBDF's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and URBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs GRLT Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GRLT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GRLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GRLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GRLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs RGSG Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, RGSG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while RGSG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGSG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to RGSG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and RGSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs CHIT Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, CHIT has a market cap of 188.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while CHIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and CHIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs FLLLF Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, FLLLF has a market cap of 82.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while FLLLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLLLF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to FLLLF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and FLLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs XTRM Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, XTRM has a market cap of 80.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while XTRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to XTRM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to XTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs BAYP Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BAYP has a market cap of 74.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BAYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BAYP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.
CDVM vs GLCO Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, GLCO has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while GLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM and GLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDVM vs BPCP Comparison
CDVM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDVM stands at 270.6B. In comparison, BPCP has a market cap of 33.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CDVM is priced at $0.00, while BPCP trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDVM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDVM's ROE is N/A, compared to BPCP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDVM is less volatile compared to BPCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDVM.