Conduril - Engenharia, S.A.
Conduril - Engenharia, S.A. (CDU.LS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDU.LS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDU.LS | €15.00 | +0.00% | 27M | -0.95 | -€15.78 | N/A |
| DG.PA | €131.60 | -0.75% | 73.2B | 15.21 | €8.65 | +3.61% |
| EN.PA | €50.34 | -1.33% | 19.3B | 16.84 | €2.99 | +3.97% |
| FGR.PA | €135.70 | -0.33% | 13.1B | 12.68 | €10.70 | +3.46% |
| ACKB.BR | €272.20 | +0.37% | 8.9B | 15.05 | €18.09 | +1.40% |
| SPIE.PA | €44.02 | +0.18% | 7.5B | 42.33 | €1.04 | +2.39% |
| DEME.BR | €190.00 | -0.52% | 4.8B | 13.86 | €13.71 | +1.40% |
| ARCAD.AS | €28.56 | +0.07% | 2.4B | 12.26 | €2.33 | +3.50% |
| BAMNB.AS | €9.03 | -3.01% | 2.3B | 11.28 | €0.80 | +2.77% |
| HEIJM.AS | €77.70 | -3.48% | 2.1B | 16.43 | €4.73 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
CDU.LS vs DG.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, DG.PA has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while DG.PA trades at €131.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DG.PA's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DG.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to DG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check DG.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs EN.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, EN.PA has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while EN.PA trades at €50.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EN.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to EN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check EN.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs FGR.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, FGR.PA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while FGR.PA trades at €135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas FGR.PA's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FGR.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to FGR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check FGR.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs ACKB.BR Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, ACKB.BR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while ACKB.BR trades at €272.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ACKB.BR's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACKB.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to ACKB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check ACKB.BR's competition here
CDU.LS vs SPIE.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, SPIE.PA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while SPIE.PA trades at €44.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SPIE.PA's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SPIE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to SPIE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check SPIE.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs DEME.BR Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, DEME.BR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while DEME.BR trades at €190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DEME.BR's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DEME.BR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to DEME.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check DEME.BR's competition here
CDU.LS vs ARCAD.AS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, ARCAD.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while ARCAD.AS trades at €28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ARCAD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ARCAD.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to ARCAD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check ARCAD.AS's competition here
CDU.LS vs BAMNB.AS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, BAMNB.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while BAMNB.AS trades at €9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas BAMNB.AS's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BAMNB.AS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to BAMNB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check BAMNB.AS's competition here
CDU.LS vs HEIJM.AS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, HEIJM.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while HEIJM.AS trades at €77.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HEIJM.AS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HEIJM.AS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to HEIJM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check HEIJM.AS's competition here
CDU.LS vs EGL.LS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, EGL.LS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while EGL.LS trades at €4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EGL.LS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EGL.LS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to EGL.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check EGL.LS's competition here
CDU.LS vs ASY.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, ASY.PA has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while ASY.PA trades at €41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ASY.PA's P/E ratio is 82.20. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ASY.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to ASY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check ASY.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs MOUR.BR Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, MOUR.BR has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while MOUR.BR trades at €720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MOUR.BR's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MOUR.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and MOUR.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MOUR.BR's competition here
CDU.LS vs CFEB.BR Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, CFEB.BR has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while CFEB.BR trades at €10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CFEB.BR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CFEB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to CFEB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check CFEB.BR's competition here
CDU.LS vs MAR.LS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, MAR.LS has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while MAR.LS trades at €2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MAR.LS's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MAR.LS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to MAR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check MAR.LS's competition here
CDU.LS vs TDSA.LS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, TDSA.LS has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while TDSA.LS trades at €0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TDSA.LS's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TDSA.LS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to TDSA.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check TDSA.LS's competition here
CDU.LS vs TVRB.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, TVRB.PA has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while TVRB.PA trades at €64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TVRB.PA's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TVRB.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and TVRB.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVRB.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs INFE.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, INFE.PA has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while INFE.PA trades at €71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas INFE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INFE.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and INFE.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INFE.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs MDF.MC Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, MDF.MC has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while MDF.MC trades at €0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MDF.MC's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MDF.MC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to MDF.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check MDF.MC's competition here
CDU.LS vs MLHYE.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, MLHYE.PA has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while MLHYE.PA trades at €125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MLHYE.PA's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MLHYE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and MLHYE.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLHYE.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs SEC.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, SEC.PA has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while SEC.PA trades at €6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SEC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SEC.PA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to SEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check SEC.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs GPA.LS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, GPA.LS has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while GPA.LS trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GPA.LS's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GPA.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and GPA.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPA.LS's competition here
CDU.LS vs MLAGI.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, MLAGI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while MLAGI.PA trades at €0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MLAGI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MLAGI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to MLAGI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check MLAGI.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs ORANW.AS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, ORANW.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while ORANW.AS trades at €5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ORANW.AS's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ORANW.AS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and ORANW.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORANW.AS's competition here
CDU.LS vs COLP.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, COLP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while COLP.PA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas COLP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to COLP.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CDU.LS has daily volatility of 0.00 and COLP.PA has daily volatility of N/A.Check COLP.PA's competition here
CDU.LS vs BOKA.AS Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, BOKA.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while BOKA.AS trades at €32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas BOKA.AS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BOKA.AS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS is less volatile compared to BOKA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDU.LS.Check BOKA.AS's competition here
CDU.LS vs MLAMY.PA Comparison April 2026
CDU.LS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDU.LS stands at 27M. In comparison, MLAMY.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDU.LS is priced at €15.00, while MLAMY.PA trades at €3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDU.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MLAMY.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDU.LS's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MLAMY.PA's ROE of -3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDU.LS and MLAMY.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLAMY.PA's competition here