Cydsa, S.A.B. de C.V.
Cydsa, S.A.B. de C.V. (CDSAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDSAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDSAF | $0.62 | +0.00% | 372M | 62.00 | $0.01 | +5.53% |
| SHECF | $30.69 | +9.51% | 57.4B | 16.64 | $1.84 | +2.35% |
| SHECY | $14.40 | -0.07% | 55B | 15.80 | $0.91 | +1.56% |
| BASFY | $12.02 | -2.28% | 42.9B | 100.17 | $0.12 | +5.24% |
| BFFAF | $47.36 | -8.04% | 42.3B | 96.65 | $0.49 | +5.39% |
| SLMNP | $890.00 | +0.00% | 26.3B | 978.02 | $0.91 | +6.74% |
| TYNPF | $37.91 | +11.53% | 16.4B | 24.30 | $1.56 | +0.92% |
| AHKSY | $14.23 | +2.37% | 9.9B | 10.84 | $1.32 | N/A |
| AHKSF | $6.97 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 10.56 | $0.66 | +3.69% |
| GNENF | $3.28 | +0.00% | 8.6B | -23.43 | -$0.14 | +0.63% |
Stock Comparison
CDSAF vs SHECF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SHECF trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check SHECF's competition here
CDSAF vs SHECY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SHECY trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check SHECY's competition here
CDSAF vs BASFY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BASFY trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 100.17. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check BASFY's competition here
CDSAF vs BFFAF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BFFAF trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 96.65. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFFAF's competition here
CDSAF vs SLMNP Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SLMNP trades at $890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 978.02. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check SLMNP's competition here
CDSAF vs TYNPF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while TYNPF trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check TYNPF's competition here
CDSAF vs AHKSY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while AHKSY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check AHKSY's competition here
CDSAF vs AHKSF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while AHKSF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check AHKSF's competition here
CDSAF vs GNENF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while GNENF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -23.43. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and GNENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNENF's competition here
CDSAF vs MTLHY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while MTLHY trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check MTLHY's competition here
CDSAF vs MTLHF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while MTLHF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check MTLHF's competition here
CDSAF vs PECGF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and PECGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PECGF's competition here
CDSAF vs IMCDY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while IMCDY trades at $54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check IMCDY's competition here
CDSAF vs GNENY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while GNENY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and GNENY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNENY's competition here
CDSAF vs TOSCF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while TOSCF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check TOSCF's competition here
CDSAF vs NNCHY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while NNCHY trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check NNCHY's competition here
CDSAF vs BCHMF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check BCHMF's competition here
CDSAF vs SOMMF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check SOMMF's competition here
CDSAF vs SHWDY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SHWDY trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and SHWDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHWDY's competition here
CDSAF vs SHWDF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check SHWDF's competition here
CDSAF vs PTGCF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and PTGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGCF's competition here
CDSAF vs SOMMY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SOMMY trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and SOMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMY's competition here
CDSAF vs KURRY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while KURRY trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and KURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRY's competition here
CDSAF vs KURRF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check KURRF's competition here
CDSAF vs KOYJF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while KOYJF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check KOYJF's competition here
CDSAF vs SVYSF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SVYSF trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and SVYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVYSF's competition here
CDSAF vs SLVYY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SLVYY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check SLVYY's competition here
CDSAF vs INDOY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INDOY's competition here
CDSAF vs KPLUY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while KPLUY trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 767.50. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check KPLUY's competition here
CDSAF vs PCHUY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHUY's competition here
CDSAF vs RBTEF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while RBTEF trades at $922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check RBTEF's competition here
CDSAF vs DENKF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and DENKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DENKF's competition here
CDSAF vs MXCHF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while MXCHF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and MXCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHF's competition here
CDSAF vs NPKYY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check NPKYY's competition here
CDSAF vs NPKYF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check NPKYF's competition here
CDSAF vs VYTPF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYTPF's competition here
CDSAF vs FRRSF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check FRRSF's competition here
CDSAF vs LNZNF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while LNZNF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and LNZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNZNF's competition here
CDSAF vs TOAGF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check TOAGF's competition here
CDSAF vs BRGAY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGAY's competition here
CDSAF vs MXCHY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while MXCHY trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and MXCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHY's competition here
CDSAF vs SGLFF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while SGLFF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and SGLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLFF's competition here
CDSAF vs TYGIF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check TYGIF's competition here
CDSAF vs NNXPF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while NNXPF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -53.95. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check NNXPF's competition here
CDSAF vs CRDE Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CDSAF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
CDSAF vs CNSJF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and CNSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSJF's competition here
CDSAF vs BNOW Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNOW's competition here
CDSAF vs HZRGF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while HZRGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and HZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZRGF's competition here
CDSAF vs BLGO Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BLGO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check BLGO's competition here
CDSAF vs BSWGF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BSWGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check BSWGF's competition here
CDSAF vs FGPHF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while FGPHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check FGPHF's competition here
CDSAF vs PLYR Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check PLYR's competition here
CDSAF vs CHHYF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check CHHYF's competition here
CDSAF vs FHELF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check FHELF's competition here
CDSAF vs EESE Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and EESE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EESE's competition here
CDSAF vs AGTT Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while AGTT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check AGTT's competition here
CDSAF vs OPCGF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 437.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPCGF's competition here
CDSAF vs CHCC Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCC's competition here
CDSAF vs AFPW Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check AFPW's competition here
CDSAF vs FLRE Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRE's competition here
CDSAF vs LBTI Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and LBTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBTI's competition here
CDSAF vs VULC Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and VULC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULC's competition here
CDSAF vs MKDTY Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check MKDTY's competition here
CDSAF vs NUEC Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check NUEC's competition here
CDSAF vs RKTE Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check RKTE's competition here
CDSAF vs BMRK Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and BMRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMRK's competition here
CDSAF vs ADKIL Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSAF.Check ADKIL's competition here
CDSAF vs ADKCF Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and ADKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADKCF's competition here
CDSAF vs FIND Comparison August 2025
CDSAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSAF stands at 372M. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDSAF is priced at $0.62, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSAF currently has a P/E ratio of 62.00, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDSAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSAF and FIND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIND's competition here