Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista Holdings, S.A.
Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista Holdings, S.A. CDNIF Peers
See (CDNIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNIF | $29.11 | -8.69% | 3.8B | 11.28 | $2.58 | +6.91% |
| DPSGY | $49.33 | +2.46% | 59.1B | 10.15 | $4.86 | +4.59% |
| DSDVY | $120.17 | +0.56% | 56.6B | 33.01 | $3.64 | +0.42% |
| DSDVF | $237.64 | -1.66% | 56B | 32.82 | $7.24 | +0.41% |
| DHLGY | $45.94 | -0.33% | 53B | 14.14 | $3.25 | +4.56% |
| DPSTF | $45.84 | +0.75% | 52.9B | 14.10 | $3.25 | +4.58% |
| KHNGY | $44.95 | -1.13% | 26.7B | 17.98 | $2.50 | +5.45% |
| KHNGF | $223.77 | -5.98% | 26.5B | 18.09 | $12.37 | +5.33% |
| QBBHY | $11.73 | +2.00% | 20.7B | 27.28 | $0.43 | +2.55% |
| JDLGF | $1.40 | N/A | 9.3B | 10.77 | $0.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDNIF vs DPSGY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DPSGY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while DPSGY trades at $49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas DPSGY's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DPSGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to DPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs DSDVY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DSDVY has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while DSDVY trades at $120.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas DSDVY's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DSDVY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to DSDVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs DSDVF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DSDVF has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while DSDVF trades at $237.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas DSDVF's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DSDVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to DSDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs DHLGY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DHLGY has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while DHLGY trades at $45.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas DHLGY's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DHLGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to DHLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs DPSTF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DPSTF has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while DPSTF trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas DPSTF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DPSTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to DPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs KHNGY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KHNGY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while KHNGY trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas KHNGY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KHNGY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to KHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs KHNGF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KHNGF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while KHNGF trades at $223.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas KHNGF's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KHNGF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to KHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs QBBHY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QBBHY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while QBBHY trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas QBBHY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to QBBHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to QBBHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs JDLGF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JDLGF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while JDLGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas JDLGF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JDLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to JDLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SGHHF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGHHF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SGHHF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SGHHF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to SGHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SGHDY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGHDY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SGHDY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SGHDY's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGHDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to SGHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs PGUCY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PGUCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while PGUCY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas PGUCY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PGUCY's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to PGUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SNOTF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SNOTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SNOTF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SNOTF's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SNOTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to SNOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs MFGHF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MFGHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while MFGHF trades at $44.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas MFGHF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MFGHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to MFGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs PTNYF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PTNYF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while PTNYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas PTNYF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTNYF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to PTNYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs ROYMF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ROYMF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while ROYMF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas ROYMF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ROYMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to ROYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs ROYMY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ROYMY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while ROYMY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas ROYMY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ROYMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to ROYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs QUBHF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QUBHF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while QUBHF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas QUBHF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to QUBHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to QUBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs OSTIY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OSTIY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while OSTIY trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas OSTIY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OSTIY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to OSTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs OERCF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OERCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while OERCF trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas OERCF's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OERCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to OERCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs KMGIF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KMGIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while KMGIF trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas KMGIF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KMGIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to KMGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs ANDHF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ANDHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while ANDHF trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas ANDHF's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ANDHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to ANDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs KRRYF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KRRYF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while KRRYF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas KRRYF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KRRYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to KRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs CTTOF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTTOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while CTTOF trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas CTTOF's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CTTOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to CTTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs CGJTF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGJTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while CGJTF trades at $69.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas CGJTF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CGJTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to CGJTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SPSTY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SPSTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SPSTY trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SPSTY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SPSTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to SPSTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs BPOSF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BPOSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while BPOSF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas BPOSF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BPOSF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to BPOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SPSTF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SPSTF has a market cap of 990M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SPSTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SPSTF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to SPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs PGUUF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PGUUF has a market cap of 903.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while PGUUF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas PGUUF's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PGUUF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to PGUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs RYSKF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RYSKF has a market cap of 724M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while RYSKF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas RYSKF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RYSKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to RYSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs PSTNY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PSTNY has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while PSTNY trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas PSTNY's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PSTNY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to PSTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs GRDLY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GRDLY has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while GRDLY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas GRDLY's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GRDLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to GRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs TNTFF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TNTFF has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while TNTFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas TNTFF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TNTFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to TNTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs BPOSY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BPOSY has a market cap of 310M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while BPOSY trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas BPOSY's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BPOSY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to BPOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs CSCMY Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CSCMY has a market cap of 230.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while CSCMY trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas CSCMY's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CSCMY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to CSCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs YTOEF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, YTOEF has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while YTOEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas YTOEF's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to YTOEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to YTOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs ESLGF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ESLGF has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while ESLGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas ESLGF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ESLGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to ESLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs TTNMF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TTNMF has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while TTNMF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas TTNMF's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TTNMF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to TTNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs JANL Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JANL has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while JANL trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas JANL's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to JANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs ASNCF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASNCF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while ASNCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas ASNCF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ASNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to ASNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs PDPTF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PDPTF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while PDPTF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas PDPTF's P/E ratio is -46.90. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PDPTF's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to PDPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs DVNHF Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DVNHF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while DVNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas DVNHF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DVNHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to DVNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs UNQL Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UNQL has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while UNQL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas UNQL's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UNQL's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to UNQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs NVGT Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVGT has a market cap of 49.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while NVGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas NVGT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NVGT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to NVGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs USRC Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, USRC has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while USRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas USRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to USRC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to USRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SCBZ Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SCBZ has a market cap of 16.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SCBZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SCBZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SCBZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is more volatile compared to SCBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.
CDNIF vs SGRZ Comparison
CDNIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNIF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGRZ has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDNIF is priced at $29.11, while SGRZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNIF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.28, whereas SGRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNIF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGRZ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNIF is less volatile compared to SGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNIF.