Icade SA
Icade SA (CDMGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDMGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDMGF | $23.60 | +0.00% | 1.8B | -8.28 | -$2.85 | +31.15% |
| GMGSF | $21.50 | -2.21% | 43.7B | 69.35 | $0.31 | +0.89% |
| STKAF | $3.54 | +4.42% | 8.5B | 29.50 | $0.12 | +4.58% |
| MRPRF | $13.60 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 9.93 | $1.37 | +2.90% |
| GSEFF | $65.30 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 89.45 | $0.73 | +6.28% |
| GPTGF | $3.26 | +0.00% | 6.2B | -46.57 | -$0.07 | +4.69% |
| LNSPF | $2.64 | +0.38% | 6.2B | 11.48 | $0.23 | +5.95% |
| LSGOF | $8.05 | +0.00% | 6B | 11.34 | $0.71 | +6.55% |
| LDSCY | $7.60 | -0.52% | 5.7B | 10.75 | $0.71 | +6.71% |
| FBASF | $1.43 | +5.56% | 5.5B | 17.81 | $0.08 | +3.87% |
Stock Comparison
CDMGF vs GMGSF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GMGSF has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while GMGSF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas GMGSF's P/E ratio is 69.35. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GMGSF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to GMGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check GMGSF's competition here
CDMGF vs STKAF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STKAF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while STKAF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas STKAF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to STKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to STKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check STKAF's competition here
CDMGF vs MRPRF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MRPRF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while MRPRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas MRPRF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to MRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check MRPRF's competition here
CDMGF vs GSEFF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GSEFF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while GSEFF trades at $65.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas GSEFF's P/E ratio is 89.45. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GSEFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to GSEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check GSEFF's competition here
CDMGF vs GPTGF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GPTGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while GPTGF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas GPTGF's P/E ratio is -46.57. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GPTGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to GPTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check GPTGF's competition here
CDMGF vs LNSPF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LNSPF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while LNSPF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas LNSPF's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LNSPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to LNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check LNSPF's competition here
CDMGF vs LSGOF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LSGOF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while LSGOF trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas LSGOF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LSGOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to LSGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check LSGOF's competition here
CDMGF vs LDSCY Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LDSCY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while LDSCY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas LDSCY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LDSCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to LDSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check LDSCY's competition here
CDMGF vs FBASF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FBASF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while FBASF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas FBASF's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FBASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to FBASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check FBASF's competition here
CDMGF vs CTOUF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CTOUF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while CTOUF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas CTOUF's P/E ratio is 282.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CTOUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to CTOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check CTOUF's competition here
CDMGF vs BRLAF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BRLAF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while BRLAF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas BRLAF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BRLAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to BRLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check BRLAF's competition here
CDMGF vs DEXSF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DEXSF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while DEXSF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas DEXSF's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DEXSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to DEXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check DEXSF's competition here
CDMGF vs UTGPF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UTGPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while UTGPF trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas UTGPF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UTGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to UTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check UTGPF's competition here
CDMGF vs BTLCY Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BTLCY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while BTLCY trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas BTLCY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BTLCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to BTLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check BTLCY's competition here
CDMGF vs UUICF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UUICF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while UUICF trades at $998.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas UUICF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UUICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to UUICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check UUICF's competition here
CDMGF vs ATTRF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATTRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while ATTRF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas ATTRF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ATTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to ATTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check ATTRF's competition here
CDMGF vs SURVF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SURVF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while SURVF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas SURVF's P/E ratio is -89.74. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SURVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to SURVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check SURVF's competition here
CDMGF vs CFMOF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CFMOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while CFMOF trades at $62.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas CFMOF's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CFMOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to CFMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check CFMOF's competition here
CDMGF vs NIPPF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NIPPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while NIPPF trades at $920.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas NIPPF's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NIPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to NIPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check NIPPF's competition here
CDMGF vs JPRRF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JPRRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while JPRRF trades at $580.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas JPRRF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to JPRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to JPRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check JPRRF's competition here
CDMGF vs GWWTF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GWWTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while GWWTF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas GWWTF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GWWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to GWWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check GWWTF's competition here
CDMGF vs HRUFF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HRUFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while HRUFF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas HRUFF's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HRUFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to HRUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check HRUFF's competition here
CDMGF vs CROMF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CROMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while CROMF trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas CROMF's P/E ratio is -345.33. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CROMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to CROMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check CROMF's competition here
CDMGF vs SHABF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHABF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while SHABF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas SHABF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SHABF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to SHABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check SHABF's competition here
CDMGF vs XIORF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XIORF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while XIORF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas XIORF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to XIORF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to XIORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check XIORF's competition here
CDMGF vs RETDF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RETDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while RETDF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas RETDF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RETDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to RETDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check RETDF's competition here
CDMGF vs CHLWF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHLWF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while CHLWF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas CHLWF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CHLWF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to CHLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check CHLWF's competition here
CDMGF vs TKURF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TKURF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while TKURF trades at $1,176.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas TKURF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TKURF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to TKURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check TKURF's competition here
CDMGF vs AOTUF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AOTUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while AOTUF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas AOTUF's P/E ratio is -66.06. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AOTUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to AOTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check AOTUF's competition here
CDMGF vs KWIPF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KWIPF has a market cap of 916.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while KWIPF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas KWIPF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KWIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to KWIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check KWIPF's competition here
CDMGF vs LAREF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LAREF has a market cap of 705.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while LAREF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas LAREF's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LAREF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to LAREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check LAREF's competition here
CDMGF vs ATVXF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATVXF has a market cap of 681.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while ATVXF trades at $915.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas ATVXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ATVXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to ATVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check ATVXF's competition here
CDMGF vs SHTRF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHTRF has a market cap of 660.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while SHTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas SHTRF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to SHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check SHTRF's competition here
CDMGF vs IGPYF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IGPYF has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while IGPYF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas IGPYF's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IGPYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to IGPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check IGPYF's competition here
CDMGF vs ARESF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARESF has a market cap of 539.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while ARESF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas ARESF's P/E ratio is -19.82. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ARESF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to ARESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check ARESF's competition here
CDMGF vs YUXXF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, YUXXF has a market cap of 462.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while YUXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas YUXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to YUXXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to YUXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check YUXXF's competition here
CDMGF vs IMMQF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IMMQF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while IMMQF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas IMMQF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IMMQF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to IMMQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check IMMQF's competition here
CDMGF vs MGRUF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MGRUF has a market cap of 275.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while MGRUF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas MGRUF's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MGRUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to MGRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check MGRUF's competition here
CDMGF vs PREUF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PREUF has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while PREUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas PREUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PREUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to PREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check PREUF's competition here
CDMGF vs BTBIF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BTBIF has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while BTBIF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas BTBIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BTBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to BTBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check BTBIF's competition here
CDMGF vs FRMUF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FRMUF has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while FRMUF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas FRMUF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FRMUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to FRMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check FRMUF's competition here
CDMGF vs FREVS Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FREVS has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while FREVS trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas FREVS's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FREVS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to FREVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check FREVS's competition here
CDMGF vs CNNRF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNNRF has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while CNNRF trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas CNNRF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CNNRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to CNNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check CNNRF's competition here
CDMGF vs HHDS Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HHDS has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while HHDS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas HHDS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HHDS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to HHDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check HHDS's competition here
CDMGF vs DDHRF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DDHRF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while DDHRF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas DDHRF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DDHRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to DDHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check DDHRF's competition here
CDMGF vs GADS Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GADS has a market cap of 109.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while GADS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas GADS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GADS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to GADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check GADS's competition here
CDMGF vs PDNLB Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PDNLB has a market cap of 13.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while PDNLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas PDNLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PDNLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to PDNLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check PDNLB's competition here
CDMGF vs AQQSQ Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AQQSQ has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while AQQSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas AQQSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AQQSQ's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is less volatile compared to AQQSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check AQQSQ's competition here
CDMGF vs ABPPF Comparison August 2025
CDMGF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDMGF stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABPPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDMGF is priced at $23.60, while ABPPF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDMGF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.28, whereas ABPPF's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, CDMGF's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ABPPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDMGF is more volatile compared to ABPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDMGF.Check ABPPF's competition here