Coeur Mining, Inc.
Coeur Mining, Inc. CDM1.DE Peers
See (CDM1.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDM1.DE | €7.50 | -0.05% | 4.9B | 30.42 | €0.25 | N/A |
| NMM.DE | €49.00 | +0.00% | 55.4B | 13.06 | €3.81 | +1.89% |
| ABR.DE | €16.99 | +0.46% | 29.2B | 14.40 | €1.18 | +2.07% |
| KIN2.DE | €13.05 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 15.55 | €0.85 | +0.82% |
| RNY.DE | €5.39 | +0.00% | 5.2B | -5.74 | -€0.94 | N/A |
| HCL.DE | €5.03 | +0.08% | 3.2B | 50.58 | €0.10 | +0.67% |
| RKVA.F | €11.66 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 14.94 | €0.78 | N/A |
| 1A9.F | €0.97 | +0.00% | 463.6M | -7.71 | -€0.12 | N/A |
| V46.F | €1.34 | +0.00% | 271.3M | -13.30 | -€0.10 | N/A |
| 1I1.F | €0.71 | +1.71% | 141.1M | -35.10 | -€0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDM1.DE vs NMM.DE Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NMM.DE has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while NMM.DE trades at €49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas NMM.DE's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMM.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to NMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs ABR.DE Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ABR.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while ABR.DE trades at €16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas ABR.DE's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABR.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to ABR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs KIN2.DE Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KIN2.DE has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while KIN2.DE trades at €13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas KIN2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KIN2.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is less volatile compared to KIN2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs RNY.DE Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RNY.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while RNY.DE trades at €5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas RNY.DE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNY.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is less volatile compared to RNY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs HCL.DE Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, HCL.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while HCL.DE trades at €5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas HCL.DE's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCL.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is less volatile compared to HCL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs RKVA.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RKVA.F has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while RKVA.F trades at €11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas RKVA.F's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKVA.F's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to RKVA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs 1A9.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1A9.F has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while 1A9.F trades at €0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas 1A9.F's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1A9.F's ROE of -23.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is less volatile compared to 1A9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs V46.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, V46.F has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while V46.F trades at €1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas V46.F's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to V46.F's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to V46.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs 1I1.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1I1.F has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while 1I1.F trades at €0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas 1I1.F's P/E ratio is -35.10. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1I1.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to 1I1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs BBDB.DE Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BBDB.DE has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while BBDB.DE trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas BBDB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBDB.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is less volatile compared to BBDB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs 0GC0.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0GC0.F has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while 0GC0.F trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas 0GC0.F's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0GC0.F's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to 0GC0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs 1ET.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1ET.F has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while 1ET.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas 1ET.F's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1ET.F's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to 1ET.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs T23A.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, T23A.F has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while T23A.F trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas T23A.F's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to T23A.F's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to T23A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.
CDM1.DE vs 0MZ.F Comparison
CDM1.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDM1.DE stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0MZ.F has a market cap of 630.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CDM1.DE is priced at €7.50, while 0MZ.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDM1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 30.42, whereas 0MZ.F's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CDM1.DE's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0MZ.F's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDM1.DE is more volatile compared to 0MZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDM1.DE.