Compagnie des Alpes SA
Compagnie des Alpes SA (CDA.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDA.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDA.PA | €24.70 | +1.23% | 1.3B | 11.82 | €2.09 | +4.45% |
| BFIT.AS | €30.04 | +0.81% | 2B | 136.55 | €0.22 | N/A |
| BEN.PA | €6.82 | -1.94% | 548.4M | -25.26 | -€0.27 | +3.23% |
| OLG.PA | €2.08 | -2.35% | 361.7M | -4.24 | -€0.49 | N/A |
| MLCMB.PA | €258.00 | +3.20% | 232.3M | 12.01 | €21.49 | +3.29% |
| ALRFG.PA | €4.43 | +0.23% | 120.9M | 22.15 | €0.20 | +2.03% |
| ALPDX.PA | €11.25 | -4.66% | 101M | 17.05 | €0.66 | +5.87% |
| SMAR.BR | €26.40 | +0.00% | 91.8M | 19.13 | €1.38 | N/A |
| ABEO.PA | €8.06 | -0.49% | 66.7M | 7.75 | €1.04 | +4.09% |
| ALMND.PA | €0.90 | +0.90% | 63.8M | 0.59 | €1.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CDA.PA vs BFIT.AS Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BFIT.AS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while BFIT.AS trades at €30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas BFIT.AS's P/E ratio is 136.55. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFIT.AS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to BFIT.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check BFIT.AS's competition here
CDA.PA vs BEN.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BEN.PA has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while BEN.PA trades at €6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas BEN.PA's P/E ratio is -25.26. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEN.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to BEN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check BEN.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs OLG.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OLG.PA has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while OLG.PA trades at €2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas OLG.PA's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OLG.PA's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to OLG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check OLG.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs MLCMB.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MLCMB.PA has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while MLCMB.PA trades at €258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas MLCMB.PA's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLCMB.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to MLCMB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check MLCMB.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs ALRFG.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALRFG.PA has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ALRFG.PA trades at €4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ALRFG.PA's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALRFG.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to ALRFG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ALRFG.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs ALPDX.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALPDX.PA has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ALPDX.PA trades at €11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ALPDX.PA's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALPDX.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is less volatile compared to ALPDX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ALPDX.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs SMAR.BR Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SMAR.BR has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while SMAR.BR trades at €26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas SMAR.BR's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMAR.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to SMAR.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check SMAR.BR's competition here
CDA.PA vs ABEO.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABEO.PA has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ABEO.PA trades at €8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ABEO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABEO.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to ABEO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ABEO.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs ALMND.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALMND.PA has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ALMND.PA trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ALMND.PA's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALMND.PA's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to ALMND.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ALMND.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs MLIFS.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MLIFS.PA has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while MLIFS.PA trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas MLIFS.PA's P/E ratio is -700.00. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLIFS.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to MLIFS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check MLIFS.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs ALLEX.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALLEX.PA has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ALLEX.PA trades at €5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ALLEX.PA's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLEX.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is less volatile compared to ALLEX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ALLEX.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs SNOW.AS Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SNOW.AS has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while SNOW.AS trades at €10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas SNOW.AS's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNOW.AS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is less volatile compared to SNOW.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check SNOW.AS's competition here
CDA.PA vs ALCYB.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALCYB.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ALCYB.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ALCYB.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALCYB.PA's ROE of -5.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is less volatile compared to ALCYB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ALCYB.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs GREV.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREV.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while GREV.PA trades at €66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas GREV.PA's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GREV.PA's ROE of -49.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to GREV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check GREV.PA's competition here
CDA.PA vs ACCEL.AS Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACCEL.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while ACCEL.AS trades at €57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas ACCEL.AS's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACCEL.AS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to ACCEL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check ACCEL.AS's competition here
CDA.PA vs CYBBT.PA Comparison April 2026
CDA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDA.PA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CYBBT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDA.PA is priced at €24.70, while CYBBT.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.82, whereas CYBBT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDA.PA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYBBT.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDA.PA is more volatile compared to CYBBT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDA.PA.Check CYBBT.PA's competition here