Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc.
Canada Silver Cobalt Works Inc. CCWOF Peers
See (CCWOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCWOF | $0.09 | -4.71% | 3.82M | -1.01 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.75 | +1.83% | 125.60B | 11.05 | $2.24 | +4.96% |
| RTPPF | $62.13 | +0.58% | 106.63B | 8.79 | $7.07 | +6.47% |
| RTNTF | $75.63 | N/A | 103.98B | 10.70 | $7.07 | +3.11% |
| GLNCY | $7.22 | +2.73% | 44.01B | -27.77 | -$0.26 | +3.00% |
| GLCNF | $3.61 | +2.67% | 43.38B | -27.77 | -$0.13 | +3.14% |
| GMBXF | $5.33 | -2.20% | 41.49B | 11.59 | $0.46 | +2.43% |
| NGLOY | $14.06 | +1.55% | 34.12B | -11.07 | -$1.27 | +2.29% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | N/A | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| FSUMF | $10.70 | -2.46% | 32.90B | 8.49 | $1.26 | +8.19% |
Stock Comparison
CCWOF vs BHPLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 125.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while BHPLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs RTPPF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 106.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while RTPPF trades at $62.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs RTNTF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 103.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while RTNTF trades at $75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs GLNCY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 44.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while GLNCY trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.77. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs GLCNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 43.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while GLCNF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.77. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs GMBXF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while GMBXF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs NGLOY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while NGLOY trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AAUKF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs FSUMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while FSUMF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs FSUGY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while FSUGY trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs CMCLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while CMCLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs TCKRF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 17.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs IVPAF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while IVPAF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs SHTLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs BOLIF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs BDNNY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while BDNNY trades at $65.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs JXMNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs IPOAF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while IPOAF trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 110.83. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ABML Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs SMMYY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while SMMYY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs STMNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PUTKF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PUTKY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PUTKY trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs NILSY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LYSCF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LYSCF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 164.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LYSDY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LYSDY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 163.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PAEKY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MALRY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MALRY trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MALRF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs FLMMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PILBF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PILBF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -90.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs CHZQ Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MIMTF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs IPGDF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AZZVF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs DWMNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs NGXXF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while NGXXF trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -30.96. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs IIDDY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs SOUHY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while SOUHY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.69. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs NICMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while NICMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ERMAF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ERMAY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PTNDY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AFBOF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PTNDF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs DETRF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ILKAY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ILKAY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AZRMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LINRF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LINRF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -44.07. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ADTLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ADTLF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ILKAF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ILKAF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ADMLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 999.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ADMLF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs BQSSF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 966.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while BQSSF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -58.22. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs FMCXF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 921.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while FMCXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs STTSY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ATUSF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 913.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ATUSF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AUSDF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs JMXXF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AFMJF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 829.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AFMJF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs VULNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 704.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while VULNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AMVMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MFRVF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs CTJHF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs TAOFF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ALMTF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 502.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ALMTF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -43.95. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs TTNNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MJDLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 491.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MJDLF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs OSTTF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MCRZF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs BIRNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LLLAF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 390.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs NQMIY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PXMFF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs REEMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 371.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while REEMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs FGOVF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 370.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -70.20. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MCHHF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs CTJHY Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MNXMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 344.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MNXMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs KMRPF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ERLFF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 331.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ERLFF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MLYF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs AUMTF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs SLGGF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ARAFF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs MLXEF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 287.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while MLXEF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs CGMLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 272.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while CGMLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs SVMLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 271.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while SVMLF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs FWEDF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 267.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while FWEDF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LTSRF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 263.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LRSRF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs STQNF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs ERDCF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 243.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while ERDCF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs SYAAF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 240.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while SYAAF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PMETF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 240.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PMETF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs RXRLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs LTHHF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs BSRUF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs PTTMF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.
CCWOF vs CILLF Comparison
CCWOF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCWOF stands at 3.82M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CCWOF is priced at $0.09, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCWOF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.01, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, CCWOF's ROE is +1.44%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCWOF is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCWOF.